Power Of Impeachment

Improved Essays
Impeachment is the power of the legislative branch granted to it by the Constitution to remove any federal officer from office on grounds of “Treason, Bribery, and other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (US Const. art. II, sec. 4). This power is further detailed in Article I Sections 2 and 3. It gives sole power of impeachment to the House of Representatives and details that the Senate has the power to try all impeachments. The power of impeachment is a fantastic example of the philosophy that no man is above the law. The power of impeachment was written into the Constitution to insure the law is upheld and obeyed by even the most powerful people in the country. It serves to fight corruption and restrict power of the national government to act outside of the law that is common in countries with authoritarian rule. The Framers of the Constitution had also seen how impeachment had become a politicized offense in countries like England. They did not want the legislature threatening or convicting federal officers of impeachment merely because they did not agree with the officer’s …show more content…
The three of the most significant impeachments where brought against United States Associate Justice Samuel Chase in 1805, against President Andrew Johnson in 1867, and against President Clinton in 1999. None of these trials resulted in an impeachment. According to Stephen B. Presser in the Heritage Guide to The Constitution, these three cases stand for the idea that “impeachment should not be perceived as a device simply to remove a political opponent” (Presser). He further states, “the caution of the Framers has been fulfilled” (Pressure). The closest the United States has come to en impeachment is in the case of President Nixon and the Watergate scandal. While several charges of impeachment where brought against him, he resigned before the trial could be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The powers of the executive branch are spelled out very loosely in Article II of the Constitution. The power of executive privilege is not expressly given anywhere. It is a power that has been derived from Constitutional foundations such as the idea of separation of powers among the three branches, but the scope of this power is very unclear. Prosecutors argued that the Founding Father's did not want a president who was above the law, while the President argued that executive privilege was necessary in order to have a functioning executive branch, and thus a functioning…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Before we get into the legal reasoning for his impeachment, we have to understand his conflicts and oppositions he had with congress and the radical republicans who deeply opposed his views on issues regarding enforcing laws in the south and ensuring former slaves get the freedom that they deserve. One way that the two sides differed was about…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On July 17, 1972, following Richard Nixon’s election members of his staff were caught stealing from the Democratic National Committee office located in the Watergate Hotel in Washington D.C.. This case went to court because the prosecutor wanted to prove that Nixon knew about the scandal and was covering up the incident. They hoped to gain the tapes and documents from the Oval Office. The question the United States Supreme Court was tasked with answering was if the President’s right to safeguard certain information, using his “Executive Privilege” confidentiality power, make them entirely immune from judicial review.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clinton's presidency was a seemingly long hard road. During his second term as President, He was impeached due to charges of lying under oath to a grand jury and obstruction of justice. However, the real underlying reason for the impeachment was Clinton’s denial of the Lewinsky Affair. The public opinion of the Lewinsky Affair allowed the Republican party to create a political strategy to use against Clinton. “Contending that Clinton had committed perjury, Republican leaders made the affair the centerpiece of their quest to defeat Democrats in the 1998 congressional elections” (Jansson, 2012,p.398).…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Impeach Clinton Lies

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A majority of the public though, continued to side with the democrats, believing that although he most definitely lied about his oath, they felt as if the lies did not matter as much because the situation did not directly affect the Nation’s well being. But how can serious lies and meaningless lies exist? Shouldn’t a lie just be a lie? Those questions were the center of the Republican’s argument. Clinton had lied under oath plain and simple and that was an impeachable offense no matter what the lie was about.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Elastic Clause

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article 2, Section 4 states, “The President, Vice-President and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” This means that Congress can take action to terminate a political leader’s term in office. If said political leader is suspected of committing “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors,” the House of Representatives has the power to bring he or she up on impeachment. Once tried, the Senate then decides to either convict or acquit the person in power. Thus the whole process is handled only by Congress.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the president is able to pass executive orders to change policy, these orders may be defunded by congress, counteracted by congressional legislation, or deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In addition, although a president is able to veto legislation, if a president continually vetoes legislation, the public may not look on him/her favorably, which would impact their electability. These factors seem to limit the president’s power greatly; however, so long as the president’s executive order is not unconstitutional, the president still wields remarkable power, as Congress would need a majority opposition in order to defund the president’s executive order. Furthermore, many of the president’s constituents could be swayed if the president were to deliver a speech concerning the necessity of his executive order. The executive branch, being the largest branch in government, requires that the president divides his power among the vice president, department heads, and heads of independent agencies in order to accomplish all of the administration’s tasks.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the late 1700s, the Federalists Papers, essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay spoke volumes to the colonial citizens. Divided into factions, the Federalists and Anti-federalists had their own views on how the government should be run. Avid supporters of the Constitution, the Federalists made a name for themselves, disguising the fact they were committed to a nationalist government. On the other hand, the Anti-federalists focused more on the true principles of the Revolution. In articles seventy-eight and seventy-nine published under Publis and Brutus, the authors clarified the structure, powers, appointments and independence of the judiciary branch.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Nixon Quitter

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Those agents also listened to phone calls and stole papers from the Democratic Party. All of these were severe breaches of the law, but unlike what many think, it was not the actual crimes that caused Nixon the most hurt. As with many crimes, historian Anthony Summers believes that “it was his lying that most damaged him during Watergate” (p 2). After denying it for two years, a tape was found that showed Nixon's involvement despite repeated denials. Not wanting to hurt the country more through the process of impeachment, Nixon resigned from the office on August 8,…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This discovery brought forth Nixon’s power abuse, his Impeachment and the only presidential resignation to…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Act was later repealed, at the time when the act was still in place, Johnson disobeyed it. Johnson tried to veto the Tenure of Office Act, but it was passed over to the Radical Republicans in Congress. The act was placed to prevent and restrict presidents from gaining power by removing past members of the office without consent from the Senate and replacing them with people who agreed with them. However, going against this act, Johnson fired Edwin M. Stanton. This is a clear violation of the law, whether it happened once or more, a president should not be able to make excuses when it comes to breaking the law.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, one man made the decision to plead Andrew Johnson not guilty. The final vote for Andrew Johnson’s impeachment came to 35-19, just one vote short of being guilty and removed from office. A senator who pleaded President Johnson guilty reported to the Governmental Gazette, “If congress knew what was good for the, Andrew…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the establishment of the United States of America, the power of the President has increased dramatically and has continued to expand over time. Specifically regarding foreign policy, is where the power of the President has continued to expand over time. Presidential power has continued to expand for many reasons. First, presidents do not believe they need congressional approval with international legal sanction. Presidents Clinton and Bush both relied on international legal authority in the form of UN Security Council resolutions to pursue military force.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, “The Perils of Presidentialism” Juan Linz observe that there are few stable democracies that have presidential systems of government. On the contrary, there are many parliamentary democracies and historically, they have performed better. Three major problems of presidential systems can be deduced from his essay; 1) Dual legitimacy, 2) fixed term, and 3) winner-takes-all logic. After explaining all three problems, this paper argues that winner-takes-all logic is as much applicable to parliamentary systems as it is to presidential systems.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Presidential Power Dbq

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many historians believe that the power of the President has decreased over time. This assumption usually results from the President’s inability to line item veto, or rejecting individual provisions of a bill. However, after much reevaluation, many other historians argue that the power of the president has increased over time because of his unique powers that he does not share with Congress. A key role model during this increase of power is Andrew Jackson, symbolizing the expandment of presidential authority due to his significant enlargement of the use of vetoes. Mandates, or official orders from the President to do something, also symbolize an independent expansion of presidential power.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays