Marco Rubis, the senator of Florida, once said “The American dream is a term that is often used but also often misunderstood. It isn’t really about becoming rich or famous. It is about things much simpler and more fundamental than that.” In some sense, Rubis’ words shed some light on the ideology concerning the American dream; people often perceive wealth and fame as the sole testament in acquiring the American dream, and due to these misconceptions, believe the death of the American dream. However, that is false. The American dream is still alive due to America providing social mobility, protection from persecution, and free from a bad economy. And perhaps due to Marco Rubis noticing the lenient flow of social classes between America and other countries, decided to make a remark such as he did as stated above.
…show more content…
According to a study conducted by Raj Chetty of Harvard University in the early 1970s, they discovered that “mobility has remained remarkably stable,” and that it remains this way for the last 20 to 25 years (Zarrol, “Study: Upward Mobility No Tougher in U.S. Than Two Decades Ago”, 6). This shows that to this day that people are still able to transition into a different social classes and economic classes from the one they were born into in the same percentage as in the early 1970s. However, in stark contrast, India remains to have strict social class called the caste system that continues to dictate a person’s life. In the year 2013, Lavanya Sankaran wrote an article for New York Times having to do with the caste system in India, and at one part she states that the “caste is making its presence felt alive...vibrantly alive when it comes to two significant societal markers--marriage and politics,” (Caste is Not Past). For example, many Indians believe the main reason to vote for a political candidate depended on the candidate’s caste. In
According to a study conducted by Raj Chetty of Harvard University in the early 1970s, they discovered that “mobility has remained remarkably stable,” and that it remains this way for the last 20 to 25 years (Zarrol, “Study: Upward Mobility No Tougher in U.S. Than Two Decades Ago”, 6). This shows that to this day that people are still able to transition into a different social classes and economic classes from the one they were born into in the same percentage as in the early 1970s. However, in stark contrast, India remains to have strict social class called the caste system that continues to dictate a person’s life. In the year 2013, Lavanya Sankaran wrote an article for New York Times having to do with the caste system in India, and at one part she states that the “caste is making its presence felt alive...vibrantly alive when it comes to two significant societal markers--marriage and politics,” (Caste is Not Past). For example, many Indians believe the main reason to vote for a political candidate depended on the candidate’s caste. In