Essay On Life Without Parole For Juveniles

Superior Essays
Life without Parole Violates Juveniles’ Rights
In a 5-4 decision the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide is cruel and unusual punishment. The Eighth Amendment states “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (U.S. Constitution, 1787). Alabama and Arkansas are two states whose court decisions were overturned due to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling. The Eighth Amendment puts limits on how severely a juvenile’s sentence can be. In several states inmates that were sentenced to life without parole as juveniles are preparing for re-sentencing. The Eighth Amendment creates a punishment ceiling that is set by the U.S. Constitution rather than legislature, however it creates a range of sentencing that a juvenile can be exposed to.
Due to the Sixth Amendment, which states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause
…show more content…
With the use of treatment juveniles negative and illegal behavior are corrected and they are able to be placed back into society and become healthy adults. According to Tate, Reppucci, and Mulvey (1995), the several types of intervention methods used to treat juveniles, they include: biological intervention, cognitive-behavioral approaches, and social skill training, and problem solving training. Biological intervention focuses on the idea that that there are genetic and neurological abnormalities that cause the violent behavior in juveniles. For adolescents with violent behavior contributed to neurological and organic impairments, pharmaceutical options may be the way to go to treat those

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Crime Simmons Case Study

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court looked back on the history of the execution of juveniles and found that the rates of capital punishment to juveniles had been reducing in frequency. To support the holding, the Courts also looked to other countries and how they handled the execution of juveniles guilty of murder. And found that many of the countries had discontinued the practice of the death penalty for minors. On a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri, Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg concurred that the evolving standards of decency do change our understandings of the Constitution and if the interpretation of the Amendment held when it was originally drafted it would allow for the execution of 7-year-old children today. Justice Scalia, Chief Justice and Justice Thomas dissented as they felt that the meaning of the Eighth Amendment should be “determined by the subjective views of the members of the court and like-minded foreigner”.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, so therefore one may not violate this particular law. However, what would happen if one did? Would it be justice? Well, “on June 25, 2012 the supreme court ruled juveniles who committed murder could not be sentence to life in prison because it violated the Eighth Amendment…” To this, though what would man be if we did not treat every person, young or old, equally.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Eight Amendment also requires that the punishment be graduated and proportioned to the offense. It forbids grossly disproportionate sentences (Rhodes, 2015). The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision and remanded. The Court held that the Eight Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment forbids a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole for juvenile homicide offenders.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A life sentence without parole is cruel and unusual punishment. Living life caged up like an animal is wrong. Patricia Smith 's New York Times Upfront article "Crime & Punishment: the Supreme Court recently struck down mandatory sentences of life without parole for juveniles. The ruling signals a shift in how the law treats young offenders" speaks upon the Miller v Alabama and the Jackson v Hobbs cases stating, "The Supreme Court rules that mandatory life without parole is unconstitutional for all juvenile offenders, even murderers" (Smith). She is saying that the Supreme Court agrees that automatically sentencing a juvenile to life without parole goes against a person 's rights.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles shouldn’t be sentenced to life without parole not just because it’s unfair, but some commit these crimes because of something bothering them. One reason is that they commit these crimes…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Children ranging from the ages of thirteen and up have been tried in court as adults and are faced with harsh sentences to die in prison without the slightest consideration of their circumstances and age for the offense penalized against them. Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the majority, determined that “requiring that all children convicted of homicide receive lifetime incarceration without possibility of parole, regardless of their age and age-related characteristics and the nature of their crimes” is a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Cost of Mass Incarceration). According to Stevenson, “The U.S. is also the only country with life sentences without parole for 13 year-olds…. kids don’t have the judgment, the maturity, the impulse control and insight necessary to make complicated lifelong decisions. They can’t make the same kind of long-term judgments.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the criminal justice system, there are many varying elements that contribute to the process through which accused offenders are counseled. As is expected, there are also numerous moral and ethical disputes that come with the territory, such as whether or not children, or 'juveniles', should be tried as adults in court for the violent crimes they commit. Some may say any child over the age of five should know the difference between right and wrong; for an individual to plan out a crime and act on it, the punishment should fit the offense, no matter the age. However, there is a thin line between vice and neurosis when it comes to juveniles. The incarceration of individuals under the age of sixteen at adult correctional facilities…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Criminal Law Foundations Evaluation The Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments are a vital part of the adult and juvenile justice system. These Amendments prohibit law enforcement or the government from caring on irrational searches and seizures, hinder law enforcement from forcing an individual to self-incriminate themselves in a case and guarantees an adult the right to a prompt trial by an unbiased jury. In contrast, juveniles are given some of the safeguards that entail the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment. This because the juvenile justice system is conducted in a more paternal and diagnostic manner.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children are usually seen as innocent, as they play around with others and are just balls of energy. Often seen as simply kids who have no experience in the outside world until they grow older. However, sometimes a child’s play can go wrong and can affect another’s life. When these incidents happen where a death is involved, it’s often easy for society to look at the offender as a murder who should be in prison for the rest of their life despite what age the offender may be. While juveniles committing heinous crimes should be punished, they should also be given the chance to rejoin society at an appropriate age; therefore juveniles who redeem themselves should be able to get released earlier and be able to put their life together.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I was unaware that thousands of juvenile offenders are living with adults in detention and correctional facilities in the United States. In Pulaski County where I work all juveniles under the age of 18 are housed with other juveniles in our juvenile detention center. It is no surprise to find that juvenile offenders that are placed with adults are in danger of sexual abuse, physical assault and have a higher rate of committing suicide (Wood, n.d.). In the Eighth Amendment, the United States Supreme Court created a set of rules that prohibit certain punishments deemed as cruel and unusual punishment. In 2012 the court decision of Miller v. Alabama, held that any mandatory life-without-parole sentencing violated the Eighth Amendment when applied…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eighth Amendment may not guarantee pretrial release; however, it forbids cruel and unusual punishment and determines that cruel and unusual relationship to the standards that society sets. The Eighth Amendment right takes a back seat to society's interest in the supervision and control of juveniles. (Elrod & Ryder, 2014) “The Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the execution of offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed” (Justia, 2005, para. 1). Juveniles are more vulnerable to police interrogation due to their extreme “immaturity and inexperience,” which…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles and Life Sentences Do juveniles deserve mandatory life in prison for their crimes or should they have the opportunity to receive a second chance? In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life sentences for any crime are now illegal to give to juveniles meaning that juveniles are no longer allowed to serve mandatory life sentences in prison. This ruling is agreeable because juveniles are not fully developed, and it is unfair for juveniles to serve mandatory life sentences. Juveniles do not deserve life sentences because the teenage brain is not fully developed.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Simmons argued that the sentence of the committed crime should not be death if the murder was an “immature and irresponsible juvenile. Agreeing, the Supreme Court made it a national consensus that the death penalty was violating the eighth amendment. The next case, Graham v. Florida shows a minor breaking probation, committing a robbery and leading a police car chase. The sentencing of life in prison without parole violated the seventeen-year-olds eight amendment because he did not commit a homicide. Using both of these court cases started to make Millers case more relatable and understanding to the courts.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults for it is wrong to hold adolescents, under the legal age, to adult standards. If children do not even receive the same rights as adults in the first place, it makes no sense to try them in adult court. These juveniles should have the opportunity to be rehabilitated in a positive manner, for they tend to come from troubled households and violent neighborhoods. In over half of the cases these troubled kids don’t know any different way than a life of crime when surrounded by both social and environmental factors that influence their delinquent actions. One must commemorate that juveniles are mentally underdeveloped, and still have time to innovate if their issues are dealt with precisely and accurately.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A rise in juvenile crime is becoming more and more of an issue in the present day. The only way to resolve this problem is to start sanctioning violent juveniles as adults. Juveniles should be able to be charged as adults in court because they commit violent crimes, they know the difference between right and wrong, communities would be safer, and juveniles would be deterred from committing crimes in the present and the future. Even though they are younger, juveniles are just as capable of committing the same violent crimes as adults. When they do, juveniles should receive the same sentence for committing the same crime.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays