When it came down to immigrant issues, all candidates unanimously agreed that a conclusion needs to be reached to change it. According to the Fox video, Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and Mike Huckabee all had different ways of solving immigration issues. Marco Rubio’s views stood out to me because he brought up his experience and tied it into the questions being asked. This is important because he does not deny where he is from or his struggles. Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio both “won” the debate because they each offered something different from all other candidates. According to the Fox video, Jeb Bush stated that he is his own man but happens to have a father and a brother who were in office already. He stated that this does not alter
…show more content…
He revolved the debate on himself, for example in the Fox video when the female host summarized hos social media posts, he stated that he could be meaner to her but he chooses not to. This implied that he accepts the facts of his social media posts and would have more than likely attacked her verbally if they were not on national television. According to the video he also stated that we continuously lose Mexico and China both at the borders and economically. His stated was too vague because anyone could state what he said. He should have provided facts about his statement. He exclusively only singled out Mexican immigrants that they are the only ones who are criminals. When in reality he is being racist because criminal activity sees no ethnicity, gender, age, etc. If he actually knew what he talked about he would know that the specific immigrant group that he singled out are the largest group of field workers in the nation. Mexican immigrants are not taking away anyone’s job they are just doing the jobs that no one is doing. Lastly, if he actually knew what he was talking about the largest groups of immigrants are not Mexican immigrants; they are from Guatemala and Honduras. This shows that he has little to no knowledge in politics and gets by, by what he reads. This also demonstrates that he not capable in running office because he would more than likely revolve it around
He revolved the debate on himself, for example in the Fox video when the female host summarized hos social media posts, he stated that he could be meaner to her but he chooses not to. This implied that he accepts the facts of his social media posts and would have more than likely attacked her verbally if they were not on national television. According to the video he also stated that we continuously lose Mexico and China both at the borders and economically. His stated was too vague because anyone could state what he said. He should have provided facts about his statement. He exclusively only singled out Mexican immigrants that they are the only ones who are criminals. When in reality he is being racist because criminal activity sees no ethnicity, gender, age, etc. If he actually knew what he talked about he would know that the specific immigrant group that he singled out are the largest group of field workers in the nation. Mexican immigrants are not taking away anyone’s job they are just doing the jobs that no one is doing. Lastly, if he actually knew what he was talking about the largest groups of immigrants are not Mexican immigrants; they are from Guatemala and Honduras. This shows that he has little to no knowledge in politics and gets by, by what he reads. This also demonstrates that he not capable in running office because he would more than likely revolve it around