Essay On Hobbes Laws Of Nature

Improved Essays
Hobbes biggest point was men always want more power and honor. He explains that in order to get the power, we will fight for it. This results in a brutish and short life for each one of us. That’s why the laws of nature and commonwealth was developed by Hobbes. The laws of nature includes the reason and will that are needed to end the everlasting battle of every man for himself. Reason gives us the idea of why we want it to end. We must realize that the battle is causing each one of us to be in constant awareness for threats. This prevent any real action to happen that brings pleasure. Reason also show that there needs to be some sort of peace to stop the war. The will allows us to be ready to give up the rights of fighting for ourselves and power. The solution to the problem that we all seems to want to solve is what Hobbes calls the commonwealth or sovereign. The sovereign is someone who will keep everyone accountable. Let say there is a group of people that each have a rock. This would be like the battle that Hobbes discussed earlier. Everyone want to attack someone else but being on the …show more content…
The overall idea is great because it would end this war between each of us. But, there are some gaps in the idea that are unexplained that makes the whole idea questionable. First is the giving up of the rights (or rocks) to the one person. Hobbes explained deeply on how we always want more power. By giving up the rights, we are making someone else more powerful. Why would we want to do that if we want power? Even with the laws of natures, making someone else powerful would override the reasoning and will. No only we are making someone else powerful but we are giving up the oppinunity to become the powerful one. Everyone would want to be the sovereign one and that will result in loss of peace. The idea of Sovereign is great if it would happen but based on the greediness of everyone, it would never happen. But are we as greedy as Hobbes said we

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4) What does Meng tzu mean by “a heart sensitive to the suffering of others?” Why does he claim that this defines our humanity, and why does it need to be developed if we are to be ethical or truly humane? What are the other three “seeds” which make up the “sensitive heart,” and how do they become developed? Why is the development of each a necessary part of humaneness?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, according to Hobbes in order to come out of this nightmarish state that is the state of nature the citizens would be willing to live under any form of authority therefore he advocates for the institution of a covenant and sovereign of power. A covenant is basically a voluntary act of consent where you the citizen are passing on to your sovereign your rights and a sovereign of power is fundamentally an absolute monarchy where there is absolute power for a single person and no one else. Hobbes states that the sovereign's power is indivisible, and he is only liable to god, no anyone else and if you revolt against him you will be going back to the nightmarish state that is the state of nature where everyone is fighting for the ultimate goal of self-preservation (115-116). Hobbes is all for an absolute monarchy thinking that one person with absolute power is better than a government or worse living in the state of nature where there are no laws and you have to fight for survival every…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 22: Enlightenment and Revolution Assessment –Research Worksheet Directions: Completion of this worksheet is a required part of your assessment for this unit. Please type into this document and email it to your teacher in the same email as the Facebook profile. Thomas Hobbes Where was he born? Thomas Hobbes was born in Westport, in 5th April 1588.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I truly believe that genetics are by far one of the biggest factors in determining the action and/or morals of an individual. In this debate, I personally agree with Thomas Hobbes in the idea that the nature of man is evil and as he states, “Everything humans beings voluntarily do is for pleasure or for self-preservation.” I feel this concept is heavily shown through the fact that all human beings react differently if put in the same situation. This shows that even though one's environment will be the same as someone else’s, people's personality determines the morals and decisions made by said individual. For example, some criminals have safe surroundings and good environments, but still make the conscious decision to commit a felony.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    9/11 Policy Changes

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes believed that with social contract anyone can have anything such as taking someone’s life or taking away someone’s property which can cause conflict and war. Hobbes claimed that if you cannot have peace then you have to practice for war. According to Hobbes, “From this fundamental law of Nature, by which men are commanded to endeavour peace, is derived this second law, “that a man be willing, when others are so too, as far-forth, as for peace, and defence of himself he shall think it necessary…””. In…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is from this idea that Hobbes argues that the fear of death and bodily harm usher man to seek collective peace. The anarchy of the state of nature is consistent with the continual emotion of fear, fear that someone will steal your property or perhaps enslavement. To relieve this tension and enjoy life with less worry, Hobbes claims that people create a social contract between them and a ruler. According to him, people would essentially give up their power to one ruler who in turn, the ruler would ensure they could live peacefully. The only right left to the people, after they give all their power to a ruler and agree to abide by those laws, is the right to not be killed.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first law of nature is to look for peace and try to act peaceful as much as one can. Further, when one fails to find or act in peace, one should use all means of war and make sure that he or she is secured and ready to fight, in case the other person decides to strike first. The second law of nature is to let go of parts of one’s natural liberty to contract peace with others which also requires others to also let go of parts of their natural liberty, so they could have mutual commitment. Furthermore, Hobbes believes that in the state of nature, there are equal opportunities of ability and desire which creates conflict, which makes people enemies of each others. I disagree with that, I think that having equal opportunities will create peace and not conflict because people will have nothing, in terms of being equal, to fight about.…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why does Hobbes consider men equal in the State of Nature? Why does this eventually compel men to form a commonwealth? Hobbes describes a State of Nature as a society with no official government. This means that people would decide for themselves; how to conduct themselves, if someone is guilty of a crime, and if they are guilty of a crime, how they should be punished.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you have an unquenchable and selfish desire for power? According to Thomas Hobbes take on human nature, you do. This view will be examined by asking; Does Hobbes’s account of why life would be so bad in the ‘state of nature’ rest on a false assumption about human nature? Who is Thomas Hobbes will be the first premise for investigation then The ‘state of nature’ as defined by Hobbes will be described then assessed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes for instance, believing that the state of nature is enviably a state of war explains that society needs a strong government to maintain order, ensuring that people do not lapse into war. This is why he argues for an absolute monarch. Hobbes view is that everyone is born with rights that they relinquish to the monarch in return for safety and protection. This is called the social contract. When people do this, they are essentially giving up their freedom and liberty, surrendering all control to the monarch.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the seventeenth chapter of The Leviathan, Hobbes describes what happens when the person enter the commonwealth. “….to appoint on man, or Assembly of men…to be the Author of whatsoever he that so beareth their person, shall Act, or cause to be acted, in those things that concern the common peace and safety; and therein to submit their wills, everyone to his will, and their judgement, to his judgement” (Hobbes 1968, 227). In this passage, Hobbes is discussing the creation of the artificial person. The state needs an actor, which will eventually be recognized as a sovereign. In Hobbes’ theory, the sovereign has supreme power because the people surrender their rights when they enter the commonwealth.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    government. Hobbes ideas impact our daily lives mainly his belief that states that the people should give up some of their rights to a more absolute power to protect them and regulate the society around them. This idea is known as a social compact or contract that states that, in their natural state, Hobbes believed that people would fight only for their self-interest and attack those who were in pursuit of their interests. The only way to stop people from engaging in this natural act was to create a government that would enforce the law and protect people from their state of nature. Hobbes negative view towards the nature of humans parallels that of the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Aquinas holds that God provides the latest guidelines, but at the same time the man is created as an autonomous being capable of developing standards from the circumstances and characteristics of the times in which they live. In other words, the moral world is not fully formed by God; the man has basic moral principles that captures as participation in the rational order of creation, but freely build their daily lives. on the other hand, Hobbes believes that the existence of society, political power, laws, and institutions is artificial; the truly natural, fundamental truth, the starting point of systematic construction, is the individual. Hobbes says that the man call good and evil to what he subjetively finds it pleasant or annoying, respectively. It Advocates, consequently, a radical nominalism, meaning that good and evil are just words to name individual sensations.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes reduces the state of nature to a list of laws based on the individual’s desire to seek peace, which would conflict with the scenario Hobbes presents. However, one could view the state of nature as an example of collective rationality prescribing individual rationality. In the end, peace may be the goal, but it can only be achieved if others are united in seeking this goal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays