Why Do Gun Control Laws Result In Less Crime

Great Essays
Do More Guns Really Result in Less Crime? Gun control has played a prevalent role in American history since the mid 1900’s. The first real gun control bill, passed by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968, was meant to regulate the sale of firearms and prohibited the selling of firearms to convicted felons. Due to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and other political figures such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. at that time, he mandated a prohibition on mail-order firearms and also harshened gun related crime penalties. Since then, other U.S. Presidents such as Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama have added new laws to the concept of gun control. Gun control, for the most part, has been viewed as a controversial political subject matter for …show more content…
The Brady Campaign’s article, “Gun Control Laws: Should the United States Adopt Stronger Gun Control Laws?”, explains why it is a bad idea to limit the amount of guns being sold. If criminals want to get guns, they will. This is no secret to the general public that when something is illegal, typically that does not mean that there are no ways of getting it. Examples of this include alcohol during the prohibition, drugs, and even gambling. There are a variety of different ways that a criminal can become in possession of a gun even if it is illegal. Ohio Governor John Kasich was quoted in the article saying “You can strip all the guns away, but the people who are going to commit crimes or have problems are always going to have the guns” (Brady Campaign). Criminals tend to purchase their firearms illegally via the “Black Market”. They also have strong motives for what they are doing and they will just purchase guns illegally if they have to. Another point to address is that it is not the guns fault or the actual gun that does the killing. Rather, it is the criminal behind it pulling the trigger. Mike Huckabee illustrates the point to us when he was quoted saying “Gun violence is a problem in this country but it 's not the fault of the Second Amendment, it 's the fault of evil people doing evil things” (Brady Campaign). The Second Amendment grants U.S. citizens the right to bear …show more content…
The topic of gun control has been quite ubiquitous amongst political views and debate topics. If there are more guns, less criminals will be willing to commit a crime. Making tighter gun laws will only affect the people that buy them legally and use them responsibly. As a nation, we need to realize that criminals will obtain the gun illegally and use it to commit crimes. Concealed carriers tend to be more capable of handling a firearm and in the chance they need it for self-defense. NRA spokesperson, Wayne LaPierre, once said “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” Just as guns have the power to take lives, they also have the power to save them, too. If you were in a position where a gun was pointed at your head, would you want a concealed carrier to step up and save your

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Criminals are labeled as criminals because they do not obey laws, so making laws to limit the ownership and usage of guns would not help prevent gun-related crimes. The laws would only limit the rights of law-abiding citizens. Perfectly stated by Jeffery Miron, “Thus the classic slogan - when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns - isn’t only a word play, it is a fundamental insight into the folly of gun prohibition. Such an approach means that the bad guys are well-armed while the law-abiding citizens are not” (“Rebutting”). Miron mentioned the foolishness of gun prohibition, which one could relate to the failure of alcohol prohibition.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reforming the way we take in a prosecute criminals to help reduce the amount of criminals on the streets is a good way to start the process. Teaching people how to use handguns safely and how to store them properly can help in the negligent use of a handgun while reducing the amount of accessibility to criminals. Also people in a major roles in society like Senators, Congress People, Representatives, etc… should go over their information before they start giving false information and ruining their image. This puts distrust in the American people making them second guess if what one is saying is totally true or not. There are many ways to reduce the amount of handgun violence without getting rid of handguns…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why is the Gun Control in the area that have the strictest laws on gun control not working? The answer is obvious it only prevent legal sales of firearms, it can’t stop illegal sales. Although gun control can stop some petty criminals from getting their hands on a gun. It can’t stop a determined one from getting it illegally from an illegal dun dealer. By definition a criminal is someone who does not abide by the laws.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson informs, “The available evidence supports the claim that self-defense is a legitimate form of deterrence. People who report to the National Crime Survey that they defended themselves with a weapon were less likely to lose property in a robbery or be injured in an assault than those who did not defend themselves” (127). What he mentions is that guns are used for self-defense are more often than for crime. Citizens without guns for self-defense, when they encounter robbery or broke in, might increase the crime rate. Therefore, I think that stricter gun control would not make the country safer but deteriorate the safety of the…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control: Unconstitutional or Constructive? In a nation of differing opinions, a few issues stick out. Gun control is one of them, a widely debated subject punctuated by acts of heinous violence. In an attempt to curb this violence, articles such as “Crime, Deterrence, and Right‐to‐Carry Concealed Handguns”, by John Lott, argue that less gun control would lead to less crime. The other side of the coin argues that more gun control would lead to less violence, and this is the argument that the article “GUN CONTROL AFTER HELLER AND MCDONALD: WHAT CANNOT BE DONE AND WHAT OUGHT TO BE DONE”, by Gary Kleck, takes.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But, it’s important to get guns out of the hands of the people who wish to do harm to others or who are very likely to do harm to others. Stricter gun laws should make it harder for people that don’t need guns to get them, keeping Americans safe from gun violence. The United States will not be able to get rid of its 301 million guns, but if the flow of the firearms is restricted, then the country will be a more secure place as a…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It states that gun control is helpless to avoid kids to use guns. After that, gun control is not a guarantee of reducing deaths. To implement gun control, it means governments restrict the sales, purchases, owning and carrying guns. It is not only ineffective in reducing death rates, but that increases with high speed. Similarly, criminals do not care laws as they illegally do many other things.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many answers someone could provide, but one of the most logical ones would be "If they did somehow manage to take away legal weapons? That would still leave criminals happily armed" (Burrus,2015). That is a scary thing to think about when you are in a dangerous situation, or if someone else was in a dangerous situation and could not be helped because of the gun control law. One could say that guns kill people, or argue that people kill people; People get stabbed,but you do not see the goverment banning knives. Many people believe that stricter gun control laws…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The liberal ideology behind gun ownership takes the stance that some type of gun restriction or ban should be imposed to control the gun violence in the United States. The vast majority would be for an imposed restriction, while the farther left and fewer liberals would suggest for an all-out ban or ban on certain guns. Furthermore, believing that the gun is what causes the crime. If the gun was restricted in some way people would not have the ability to cause such harm to the general welfare of the common people. Some of these restrictions are: maximum clip limits, ban on certain assault rifles, and a system to track gun ownership.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics