Essay On Group Cohesiveness

Improved Essays
Three Antecedent Conditions of Groupthink As stated above, there are three antecedent conditions of groupthink: 1) Group Cohesiveness; 2) Structural faults; and 3) Provocative situational context. According to Janis, the most essential antecedent is group cohesiveness. This antecedent “implies a conventional understanding of the term as the ‘forces which are acting on members to stay in a group’” (McQueen 55). Group Cohesiveness entails an assembly of decision makers, known as the “core group”. This specific group consisted of President George W. Bush, VP Dick Cheney, NSC Advisor Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, VP Chief Aide Scooter Libby, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas J. Feith, George Tenet, and Colin Powell. Powell and Tenet, being the skeptics, had different opinions about the invasion of Iraq; disagreeing with hawk members. Since there was not a willingness to coordinate between the whole core group, there is a lack of evidence of group cohesiveness. …show more content…
Janis speculates that “situational stress results from the collective perception that there is little hope for finding an alternative solution to that proposed by the leader or other prominent group members and temporarily low self-esteem caused by recent failures or the challenge of the decision-making task” (McQueen 57). As a political leader, there is large amounts of stress to any decision that is to be made, making the decision making process more difficult. While the Bush administration addressed the issue of going to war with Iraq, they were not racing against a clock. There was no time pressure to make a decision, and despite this there was a feeling of the crisis being drawn out. Sooner or later they would have to make a decision. Following these conditions are the symptoms of groupthink, resulting in a negative impact on the decision-making

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Hostages The choice of a rescue mission seemed necessary in releasing the American hostages from Iranian students. President Carter had previous tried other types of military tactics in order to rescue them. The crisis at the time had be going on for about 6 months when “Operation Eagle Claw” was established. The rescue mission ended in complete failure.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Answering the above questions we can proceed to the next step which is how to implement the proposal. The groupthink is a result of bad processes, isolation and a desire preserving at all costs of group cohesion. All these factors however, can be addressed positively so that collective decisions can be improved and have only positive effect on business and its…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Groups, crowds, and teams can have an effect on ones behavior. Groupthink is defined as a kind of thinking in which maintaining group cohesive-ness and solidarity is more important than considering the facts in a realistic manner (Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. ,2013).Group polarization is defined as The tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of its members (Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. (2013). For example lets there was a small isolated school and people want to believe that they had the best football team and they had the best players. Eventually everyone collectively starts to believe that they’re the best football team and they may make the mistake of challenging…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Groupthink, which is the excessive likelihood among members of a group to see ingroup agreement, is most prevalent when the need for agreement takes precedent over accurate or informed decision making. There are three main contributing factors to groupthink, all three of which are present in the article. First, the police officers were a highly cohesive group. In order to function effectively in emergency situations, being cohesive can sometimes be necessary. However, it also promotes groupthink.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unit Two Paper Groupthink Self-Censorship A follower or a leader can make hasty decision in a meeting to accomplish key events by allowing groupthink to cloud his or her judgment. Riggio et al., 2008 explains groupthink: Often highly cohesive group exert high pressure toward conformity in individuals who challenge the collective norms or decisions. This pressure leads to self-censorship, thus decreasing critical thinking.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kirst-Ashman states that groups progress through unique stages as they cultivate (2011). The unique progression of groups occurs in five stages which include “composition, beginnings, assessment, stabilization and working, and ending stages” (p. 101). Groupthink may occur in the beginnings stage. This stage allows for group members to discuss the reasons they are a part of their particular group. Individuals in their respective group are still getting accustomed to one another (Kirst-Ashman, 2011).…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people, in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision making outcome. Jonestown is a great example of groupthink because everyone believed in Jim Jones. Hundreds of people thought it was a great idea to commit mass suicide in Jonestown, all under the command of their detrimental leader, Jim Jones even though some of them thought it was a preposterous…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In The Crucible

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When we work together we are able to get so much more done than we would be able to do just by ourselves. In contrast, some negative effects of groupthink is the fact it discourages individual responsibility and creativity. When we work alone we are able to focus on strengthening and carrying out our own ideas, but when we are in a group we are influenced by other people’s ideas and how them might be better or worse than our own. Also when we work alone we must be responsible to get the task done or find a solution for something in a timely and neat manner. Also when we work as a group this could create fighting such as when Hathorne says, “Why do you hurt these children?”…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dealing With Groupthink

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I can relate to you post and how your experiences in dealing with Groupthink can ultimately make the success of a group difficult. I also learned in high school and the military how important it is to speak up even if it could potentially create waves. I currently am a leader of a highly competitive gaming team, which has 15 members. I am desperately trying to be a leader that values their opinions and expectations. I put a lot of effort into getting everyone involved in the decision process and I even have tried to give everyone a role.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Exprience With Group Think Alicia Hilton UMUC Comm 300 According to (Turner and West, 2014, "Introducing Communication Theory"p261) "Closed Mindedness, Out-group Stereotypes, Collective Rationalization are all symptoms of groupthink. " I never knew the term "groupthink" was what I experienced throughout my life. when my thoughts were dismissed or I was forced to be silent to conform with the group's not so great of a idea.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Academic Paper Review Andrzej A. Huczynski and David A. Buchanan 1985, 2007. Organisational Behavior.731-761 At the beginning of the chapter, Huczynski and Buchanan both acceded that decision making is one of the most important element in an organisation. Decision making are made by both manager and none manager and plays as a backbone in all organisation. Decision making is one of the key elements of formal organisation apart from specialization, incentives and authority (Barnard 1938).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My Final Reflection This semester during Introduction to Group Communication, I have learned so much that I will be able to take with me throughout my life and career. There are a number of topics that I have found to be crucial in interacting with people on a professional level. There have also been a number of topics that I will be able to practice in my personal life at home, as a wife and mother.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Group decision making is a type of participating process in which multiple individuals act collectively, analyze problems or situations, consider and evaluate alternative courses of action, and select from among the alternative solutions presented. On average, groups make more accurate decision than individuals and members of a group have individual accountability; the team has both individual and collective accountability. There are multiple advantages to group decision making. When making decisions in groups, the group will bring a wide range of experience with diverse perspectives to the decision making process generating more alternatives to a problem. By involving members in the group decision making process, they are more likely to accept…

    • 1274 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Team Decision Making Decision making is an integral and necessary part of developing and progressing in a team, it 's a sequence of activities that includes gathering, interpreting, and exchanging information as well as creating and identifying alternative courses of action (Thompson, 2014). Decision making is key for problem solving, creativity and managing ideas - information that is distributed amongst a team must be given equally to all its participants. This information should be integrated into the problem-solving process. Within in any team, there are different issues and situations that can arise which can prevent the team from prevailing - there are five pitfalls which can affect a team 's decision making. Groupthink, escalation of…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Robbins & Judge (2009) note, group decision making is often more time consuming than individual decision making, and can open the door to the phenomena of groupthink and groupshift, which can degrade a group’s ability to objectively arrive at a quality solution (p. 302-304).The nominal group technique, the use of electronic meetings, and the inclusion of the idea of covenant in forming groups are several tools available to help mitigate some potential pitfalls of the group decision making process. Nominal Group Technique The nominal group technique allows individuals come up with their own ideas…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays