Consequentialism evaluates the morality of actions in terms of progress toward a goal or end, the greatest good for the greatest number. The morality or goodness of an act is judged by its consequences without consideration of the intent. On the other hand, Utilitarianism defines morality in terms of maximization of the net utility expected for all parties affected by a decision or action. The morality of an act is judged by its utility or usefulness for the most people. The two concepts are very similar, hence considered synonyms by Morrison and Furlong.
Among the types of consequentialism, rule consequentialism is most useful for health care leaders. Under this concept, behavior is evaluated by rules that would lead to the greatest good for the greatest number. Leaders and managers of the modern day would call these rules