Essay On Common Good Theory

Improved Essays
The Common Good theory, is a theory on groups and individuals based on Aristotle’s principles. It states that the highest good can be achieved when people work together to obtain a certain goal. It is defined as, “a good proper to, and attainable only by the community, yet individually shared by its members” (Dupre, 687). These goods can be material possessions or abstract resources such as honor, security, or any other thing that people have to share. Aristotle states that the scarcity of these resources makes them the subject of intense competition and conflict (Smith, 626). This in turn, leads to Aristotle’s notion for the motive for injustice, which is the lack of sensitivity to other people’s notion of the good (Smith, 626). It is important to look into the common good theory, as Aristotle believed that it had the potential to reorient individuals to a more justice-filled vision of politics and life in general. Although talk about the Common Good has been abandoned in the 20th century, this essay claims that a Common Good can exist in the …show more content…
Certain groups become limited, the poor or unqualified receive unequal treatment, cultivating civil unrest. This isn’t the only case with America and its society, “all around the world fragmentation has been associated with major economic disruptions, anger over the fact the new opportunities were limited to the rich, the powerful, or the criminal; an overall environment of lawlessness combined with failure of systems of police and justice; and increased crime and violence” (Waller). “Youth are most affected; they see no chance for participation in the development of the country. In spite of their education and energy, they are helpless, frustrated, and dangerous” –Kenya 1997 (Waller). This is all due to the lawlessness, poverty, crime, and violence created over the scarcity of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers have long argued about the correct way to organize a group of people to maximize safety, happiness, and order. John Stuart Mill and Plato, two prominent philosophers of their respective eras, created contradicting theories on how best to create a flourishing society. Although their theories are different, Mill and Plato both focus on the roles of people in society. Mill specifically believes that people should act in ways that promote self-benefit while avoiding harming another person (2002, p. 8).…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The common good in society can be interpreted as all that which furthers the well-being of all, whether collectively and individually. The common good can include important values such as justice and respect, or certain establishments, such as an education. Undeniably, the common good includes the factors that allow individuals and communities to not only survive, but foster and thrive to their full potential. Thus, there are many behaviors or attitudes that shape the common good. In Fr.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Once we recognise the dependence of human beings on society, then our obligation to sustain the common good of society are…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Counterargument Although Boyz n’ the Hood made valid arguments about the state of society during the 1990s and the decades prior, Singleton does not use the film to produce a perennial message. The film is an outdated and fictional portrayal of society today, because society has greatly progressed in the nearly twenty-five years that have passed since the movie was first released. African Americans and minorities are much closer to equality than they have been in the past and are increasingly finding themselves in powerful sectors of society-- people of different ethnic backgrounds can be found in the seats of Justices of the Supreme Court and the nation’s first African American president is currently in office.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon Vs Socrates

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Imagine a man that always donate clothes and feeds the homeless. This man regularly visits children with terminal illnesses and is one of the largest donors to Susan G. Komen for the Cure non-profit organization. He is viewed by tens of thousands as a saint, heaven sent or a reincarnation of Jesus himself. A just man in the eyes of many, but this man has twisted dark secrets; which involve human trafficking, murder of any competitor and extortion of politicians. The man is an unjust person by nature but is viewed as just.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an attempt to amass an overall consensus of justice being desirable as a benefit to the health of the soul, and the necessity placed on maintaining its ideals as a virtue (as expressed by Socrates to resolve Thrasymachus's definition); Glaucon extends his argument of justice to include the concept of the Three Kinds of Goods. As explained, all goods can be divided into three classes: as a mere means such as physical labor, as an end akin to joy, and as both a means and an end comparable to maintaining knowledge (Plato 32 [II]). Each assertion made by Glaucon, is an attempt to solicit the most authentic form of what justice is and to determine which kind of good it perpetuates. Although an advocate for the belief that justice is coveted both as a means and an end, Glaucon alludes to the fact that most individuals classify justice under the first group: justice is no more than a mere means.…

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Society Essay

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout history, when historians consider the success of the Great Society, a divide appears, one side believing that the Great Society was a total failure and a huge waste of government money, conversely the other side believing that the Great Society really improved the American life and was a worthwhile plan. Two notable historians, George F. Will and Joseph Califano butt heads in this argument. Califano, who worked closely with Lyndon B. Johnson, believes that the Great Society was a huge success, which rebuts Will’s ideas that the Great Society caused over dependency on the national government and its provisions. Califano believes that the Great Society’s legislations brought down the poverty level and improved Americans lives in many…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Institutions regarding Racial Inequality Slavery ended over 150 years ago and In 1964 the Civil Rights Act ended all laws regarding segregation. Have you ever wondered why racial inequality is still prevalent in today’s day and age. Well a lot of the reasoning behind racial inequality still existing is in fact due to social institutions. Throughout the course of this paper I’m going to argue that inequality still presides due to institutional arrangements thus being unsustainable.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States of America, often dubbed the “Land of Opportunity,” has always been viewed as a place where even the lowest of the low could go to try to make a name for themselves. A nation of the liberty to pursue ambitions, a haven for outcasts, a new world for people to establish for themselves. Since its birth, people have flooded into its ports and worked the malleable land into homes and farms and cities. These same people sought refuge from cruel and unyielding governments and found land to call their own while they chased freedom. All throughout America’s history, its people have been filled with one shining dream: a dream of bettering themselves and their futures.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone is know who is King, Martin Luther Jr even if he is Chinese. The famous in china,was King helped to organize the 1963 March on Washington, where he delivered his famous "I Have a Dream" speech. There, he established his reputation as one of the greatest orators in American history. When I first read this article in China, I found that this is what a powerful guy, he is in the maintenance of justice.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thucydides’ description of the Peloponnesian War, besides being an account of an enormous conflict, also serves as an account of the many views of justice. The Athenians, the imperial force in ancient Greece, often assert that justice plays no role in foreign affairs. This belief, specifically explained at Sparta and Melos, is the Athenian Thesis. Although not all Athenians agree with the Athenian Thesis as proposed at Sparta and Melos, it is still an important theme in the Peloponnesian War. The Melian Dialogue specifically displays how little regard the Athenian Thesis shows for justice.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Police brutality and court systems and structural violence This world is arranged by tiers according to race, culture, gender, sexuality, and many more individualities. If you are perceived to be on the “better” or more preferred side of these characteristics, you are treated tremendously different than those of the lower hierarchy. This is the structural violence. When one group of people is treated better than another group of people because of their characteristics.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays