Essay On Classical Liberalism Vs Neoconservatism

The perspective suggested by the speaker of the source agrees with the principles of classical liberalism and neoconservatism. The source advocates that the transition from welfare capitalism to welfare state was driven by “misguided desire” towards egalitarianism in the social aspect of society. Therefore “dependency on the state...emerged.” Only a state that promotes individualism will eliminate dependency. Business owners in the era of classical liberalism would agree with the perspective in the source. Welfare state brought forth a further increase in government involvement in the economic sector of society. Wealthy business owners during the classical liberalism period profited due to the minimal regulations required to employ peasants or lower class individuals examples like, working conditions, working hours, and wage earned, had shown that the lack of government involvement allowed for the abuse of employees. Certain motivation for the creation of the source would be that the government, now playing a key role in the economic sector, displeased the author. Peasants during the era of classical liberalism would disagree strongly with the source. “The wage gap,” child …show more content…
When opposing government systems of, egalitarianism and individualism interact, violent conflicts harming individuals can occur. The disagreements of two states leads to the desire to convert or alter the beliefs of the opposing state. During the Korean War, totalitarian states such as North Korea, China, and the Soviet Union were in conflict with mainly South Korea, the United States, United Kingdom and which are democratic states. Millions died as a result of the conflict between states of large government involvement in the economy and states that possess a small amount of government involvement in the economy. There cannot be equality within the state if there is not equality within the individuals of the globe. Egalitarianism is a fictional