Essay On Characteristics Of A Scientist

Decent Essays
In today’s society, the media has a major influence on a person’s decision. Their views are manipulated due to media’s not so realistic display of certain genres, such as science. Throughout the years’, science has been given a fictional look from the media, which makes it difficult to determine which is factual. In the present, TV shows like MythBusters, Breakthrough, and Bang Goes the Theory, depict actual scientific methods and theories that help to advance science. On the other hand, there are shows like Killjoys, The 100, and Legends of Tomorrow that give a more futuristic view on science.
When you hear the word “scientist” what do you envision? Which famous people or characters from the media come into your mind? What characteristics do they have in common? Discuss at least three characteristics of your vision of a scientist. In my opinion, when I hear the word “scientist” I envision a person in a white lab coat, with eyeglasses, working in a laboratory. When I allow my imagination to soar, scientist appears to me as what most would call “Mad Scientist”. Their demeanor is unorthodox and in most cases isn’t intended for positive results, but despite
…show more content…
The television shows and movies that exist now have some form of science fiction in them. I believe some people would say that it may be seen as a negative force in the world due to the influences it haves on people. For example, if a child is watching a movie such as Iron Man, he/she becomes captivated by the “cool” things Ironman can do and the gadgets and machines he creates. Some kids may attempt to recreate his actions, but the end result will be them hurting themselves or others. I do not think that all science fiction is a negative force in the world. Some aspects of the fictional characters should be viewed as motivation. Motivation to surpass what is believed to be limited and go over and beyond the expectations of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    For instance, she blames the challenges that result in misunderstandings and confusions of the public on matters of scientific developments to the difficulty that the scientific communities experience when finding appropriate terminology. In addition, the professor argues that the complex nature of modern science as another course of people’s misunderstanding of the advances being made in scientific fields. Question 3 In essence, Randall’s audience appears to share her warrants, owing to the fact that there is a significant level of misunderstanding of scientific developments. Therefore, the concerns raised by the author of the article are authentic, and they deserve to be addressed.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why We Should Trust Scientists,” by Naomi Oreskes, the presenter describes what makes science so unique, and distinguishes it from other fields such as religion. Oreskes claims that science is an appeal to authority, but unlike other similar appeals, it is the collective authority of a group of people, somewhat like a community. Throughout her speech, she conveys to her audience different examples of historical figures who worked in science, and uses them as proofs to help understand the point that she is making. In doing so, she describes that what makes this specific field so special, is the fact that science itself, and the ways that one tries to test a theory on a specific subject are not related; but rather, as was said by Paul Feyerabend…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mohammad Gumma Mrs. Staton AP European History 14 October 2015 Prompt: Evaluate the extent to which political and social factors affected the work of scientists in the sixteenth and seventeenth century. The Restrictions and Magnetisms of Scientific Efforts Throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, there was an emergence of new fundamentals and a modernized view of the natural world. This period came to be established as the Scientific Revolution.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Mistrust of Science” by Atul Gawande is a commencement address at the California Institute of Technology. Atul Gawande calls upon the institutes graduates to take a stance and defend the common misconceptions and myths about scientific issues concerning today’s society. The commencement’s main goal was to use a logical thought process to defend the scientific evidence against common misconception. For example, Atul Gawande says “They deploy false analogies and other logical fallacies… when scientists produce one level of certainty; the pseudoscientists insist they achieve another.” Atul claims that pseudoscientists deploy a poor sense of logical reasoning to mislead the public, which cannot be backed up by hard scientific evidence.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientists should take the responsibility and conscientiousness throughout their innovative experiments, instead of being selfish. Scientists tend to be egocentric on fulfilling their goals and dreaming of their rewards. Generally, the scientists have the propensity to forget about how the society will be impacted by their creation before and after. Victor Frankenstein is one the greatest examples that can relate to this idea.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The traditions practiced has came with distrust to science but also a great achievement to humans by the technology it has created. Oscar Handlin explains that scientist are not always looked at as individuals that create technology. He goes on to say, “a deep underlying distrust of science runs through the accepted attitudes of people in the most advanced nations.” This distrust…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Having a significant amount of knowledge and power to create and bring life into this world with the inovation of science can kead to a social destruction against man kind. Going against humanity and letting the power of science interfere with society with what us considered "normal" is frightining and morbid. In the classic novel, Frankeinstein by Mary Shelley, a life was created by Victor Frankenstein using the power of science and knowledge. Although Frankeinstein proved to himself that using the correct tools and with dedication you can create and make anything happen it also caused danger and destruction with the i teraction between the monster and humans.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and “ To be a scientist requires not only intelligence…” to create a tone of haughtiness, or a “members-only” feel. A list of personality traits of a scientist includes, “... intelligence, curiosity… passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage,” stated as though they are a requirement. In contrast, Barry notes that not all scientists will have the courage, curiosity, etc. to be a pioneer scientist and venture into the world…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facing the uncertainty of the natural world, scientists seek to order observable phenomena with structured methodology. Scientific research explains the unknown and provides humanity with a better understanding of the universe. However, the process of decoding the vast unknown is long and arduous; scientists tasked with unravelling the mysteries of the universe must be dedicated to the process and resilient to failure. In The Great Influenza, John M. Barry characterizes scientific research as a noble endeavor only worthy of those of great intelligence and passionate resolve. Barry Utilizes juxtaposition and extended metaphor to present scientific research as a difficult but enlightening process.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 16th and 17th centuries, scientists began to question the long held theories of science. This new period, known as The Scientific Revolution, brought controversial opinions of political and social views. Scientists flourished with a variety of concepts, complex as the Three Laws of Motion, or as simple as the Heliocentric Model. Although we still follow these theories and support the studies of science today, life wasn’t that easy back then. Scientists were affected by many aspects of society such as church criticism, gender discrimination, and supportive leaders.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Different Insights of Science and Technology Science and technology have drastically changed over the years. However, in some circumstances change is not always considered to be positive. For example, science comes from the Latin word, scientia, meaning knowledge. The definition of scientia reveals the underlying meaning of what science really means. In certain situations, science has the power to regulate people’s lives because the regulators receive too much knowledge from science.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The sharp contrast created between the world as it is habitually seen and how a scientist sees it reveals how unclear and indeterminate the scientific process is. Being so different from how most people see the world, it is as if the perspective of a scientist is one that has pulled from a children’s fantasy novel, characterizing the world of science as unpredictable and even fantastical. Looking at the world through a scientific lends warps one’s perspective of it, allowing for the exploration of the fine details of life through science. In conclusion, everything becomes an opportunity for discovery and everything that seemed to be set in stone can still be…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science and scientific investigators must doubt themselves and question everything, and this inquisitive behavior is shown by the great scientists in the past. Barry uses allusions to the works of famous scientists to show that even the greats from the past have the same characteristics of questioning everything that successful scientists today have. John M. Barry first alludes to a great psychologist from the nineteenth century named Claude Bernard who “said ‘science teaches us to doubt’” (Barry). By referencing Claude Bernard, Barry shows the audience that scientists doubting themselves is not a new concept.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While in the vice-president position of this association, Rowland developed a speech intended for the scientists willing to promote a more effective way of researching. This group consisted of scientists dedicated to improving the way scientific research was conducted in America. Rowland’s purpose for delivering this speech was to provide the indistinguishable evidence of wrongly-researched science that was concealed during the 19th century as a result of the working world. Ultimately, he wanted to encourage positive development towards the motives and ambitions of American science. In his speech A Plea for Pure Science, Rowland addresses the scarcity of “pure science” in the American community.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: The Danger of Science Denial It is important to appreciate the current nature and status of the world because there are individuals who laid the appropriate foundation for it. As Michael Specter’s TED Talk on The Danger of Science Denial, he outlined the challenges that might emanate from science denial. There are reasons that ought to be checked critically since they affect the current and future generation and they include health, wealth, mobility, opportunity and declining rates of diseases. It is critically clear that Specter did an excellent job that the audience can relate to, he did this by discussing emphatically on important issues that affect the current world.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays