Bowie legitimizes, “The tone and rhythm of utterance can be more significant than its ‘propositional content,’ and this already indicates one way in which the musical may play a role in signification. Judgment on whether music has meaning in the way natural languages do would seem to presuppose an account of verbal meaning that allows it to be strictly demarcated from whatever it is we understand in wordless music (Bowie, 4).” The strength of this circle is vague; Bowie's certain contention recommends that circumventing this circle require language’s implication to be grounded in something non-semantic (for him, music). However, nothing about logical clarifications of language prefaces this. Most likely we can use an investigative language to say that non-linguistic objects or procedures, e.g., intelligence or advancement, cause languages to show certain
Bowie legitimizes, “The tone and rhythm of utterance can be more significant than its ‘propositional content,’ and this already indicates one way in which the musical may play a role in signification. Judgment on whether music has meaning in the way natural languages do would seem to presuppose an account of verbal meaning that allows it to be strictly demarcated from whatever it is we understand in wordless music (Bowie, 4).” The strength of this circle is vague; Bowie's certain contention recommends that circumventing this circle require language’s implication to be grounded in something non-semantic (for him, music). However, nothing about logical clarifications of language prefaces this. Most likely we can use an investigative language to say that non-linguistic objects or procedures, e.g., intelligence or advancement, cause languages to show certain