A. Provide a brief overview of your topic.
i. What is the premise or premises for the argument?
How has the media changed the way people look at the law enforcement and knowing your rights when you get pulled over and things that can deescalate a situation which that are easily avoidable if you stay calm and respectful?
ii. Why is the topic being discussed?
This is a hot topic in our world today due to uneducated and the racial divide that our country has using what the media feeds us without putting out the whole story or the whole video of what happen. There is many movements but one that has started since it has become such a hot topic is Blue Lives Matter after the Black Lives Matter movement started.
iii. What is the conclusion? …show more content…
To summarize, the topic presented in this article is about Don’t be so quick to condemn law enforcement without getting all the information. That the media mainly reports anything negative about law enforcement or premises for the argument is/are Since the media movement is to mainly report about race of a cop during a shooting making it seem like it was because of an racial topic to undermine the law enforcement. This topic is relevant and being discussed because Before Obama undermine the law enforcement the killing of cops were going down. Since he made statements in the Zimmerman case in 2012 the cop killings has almost doubled. The personal connection I have to this topic is Being retired military and knowing how it is to put your life on the line for people who don’t care about and when they get the chance that they will stab you in the back. This topic is of particular interest to me because all lives matter, we all bleed the same way. Getting the media to put out the 95% of what law enforcement does good instead of the 5% that has done …show more content…
Describe the logic and reasoning used to advance the argument.
i. Considering the premises and conclusion, what logic and reasoning is used to advance the argument?
That Obama and the media has played a huge roll in the way some act toward law enforcement and making it about a race and gender debate over the 5% wrong doings of law enforcement and not focusing on the 95% that doing justice for the community.
ii. What questions are left unanswered? Describe any gaps or weaknesses present in the logic and reasoning used to advance the argument.
Why don’t the news report more about positive things that the law enforcements does?
Outline for
i. What is the premise or premises for the argument?
How has the media changed the way people look at the law enforcement and knowing your rights when you get pulled over and things that can deescalate a situation which that are easily avoidable if you stay calm and respectful?
ii. Why is the topic being discussed?
This is a hot topic in our world today due to uneducated and the racial divide that our country has using what the media feeds us without putting out the whole story or the whole video of what happen. There is many movements but one that has started since it has become such a hot topic is Blue Lives Matter after the Black Lives Matter movement started.
iii. What is the conclusion? …show more content…
To summarize, the topic presented in this article is about Don’t be so quick to condemn law enforcement without getting all the information. That the media mainly reports anything negative about law enforcement or premises for the argument is/are Since the media movement is to mainly report about race of a cop during a shooting making it seem like it was because of an racial topic to undermine the law enforcement. This topic is relevant and being discussed because Before Obama undermine the law enforcement the killing of cops were going down. Since he made statements in the Zimmerman case in 2012 the cop killings has almost doubled. The personal connection I have to this topic is Being retired military and knowing how it is to put your life on the line for people who don’t care about and when they get the chance that they will stab you in the back. This topic is of particular interest to me because all lives matter, we all bleed the same way. Getting the media to put out the 95% of what law enforcement does good instead of the 5% that has done …show more content…
Describe the logic and reasoning used to advance the argument.
i. Considering the premises and conclusion, what logic and reasoning is used to advance the argument?
That Obama and the media has played a huge roll in the way some act toward law enforcement and making it about a race and gender debate over the 5% wrong doings of law enforcement and not focusing on the 95% that doing justice for the community.
ii. What questions are left unanswered? Describe any gaps or weaknesses present in the logic and reasoning used to advance the argument.
Why don’t the news report more about positive things that the law enforcements does?
Outline for