Whitman normally experiments as well as explores the free verse whereas the Melville normally strictly builds his poetry. Their stylistic normally differ parallel and the dissimilarities in their conceptions of the war along with their treatment of it in their poems. Melville is cynical of it as well as its ramification for the American democracy, thoroughly examining the difference between the ideal of the war as well as the realism of it; Whitman passionately supports the goals of the war and maintains an hopeful attitude regardless of the cruelty as well as death of people that unavoidably transpire.
Therefore, the poems “The March into Virginia” by Herman Melville as well as “Beat! Beat! Drums!” by Walt Whitman usually exposes the primary philosophical along with political differences between the both poets ,thus demonstrating Whitman as an experimentalist as well as Melville as a traditional strict-constructivist, …show more content…
According to Whitman, it was an obligation to conserve the union. Melville is further cautious, freighting that American democracy particularly that of the people’s faith in the founder’s conception of America was normally compromise by the North when they attempt in declaring their political authority over the lives of Southern people. Melville’s poem “The March into Virginia” normally serves as a philosophical counterpoint to the passionate nationalism that is professed in “Beat! Beat! Drum!” by