Smith was engaging the readings by talking about real life again but with making the reader acknowledge the “stress levels” “spending patterns” and “having children”(Smith, 2013, para. 7), because most people that will read Smith’s essay will be able to relate to all of these things that go on. She then goes on to further the pathos device by using the psychologist, with what they said to believe there are two ways life may lead, a happy life or meaningful life, the difference between the two that the psychologist say is that the happy life is associated with being a “taker” and meaningful life is associated with being a “giver” (Smith, 2013). Right here she makes readers think whether she is right with what she is saying. The readers can start to think to themselves, “Do I live a meaningful life or happy
Smith was engaging the readings by talking about real life again but with making the reader acknowledge the “stress levels” “spending patterns” and “having children”(Smith, 2013, para. 7), because most people that will read Smith’s essay will be able to relate to all of these things that go on. She then goes on to further the pathos device by using the psychologist, with what they said to believe there are two ways life may lead, a happy life or meaningful life, the difference between the two that the psychologist say is that the happy life is associated with being a “taker” and meaningful life is associated with being a “giver” (Smith, 2013). Right here she makes readers think whether she is right with what she is saying. The readers can start to think to themselves, “Do I live a meaningful life or happy