The Most Dangerous Game Book Vs Film Analysis

Ever think of an event a certain way and later come to realize that it was not what came to mind in the first place or that it was exactly how it was pictured? Well that is what Richard Connell; author of “ The Most Dangerous Game” and film director Ernest B. Schoedsack came to do. Rainsford and the being hunted experience was described differently in each story. Therefore, contrasting occurrences may change thoughts around of each character, but a few resemblances can also reassure them. Both the film and the story talk about General Zaroff’s passion for hunting and his ability to capture specific details while observing his pray. “… Me he made a hunter. My hand was made for the trigger, my father said,” explained Zaroff to Rainsford as he poured liquor into Rainsford glass (Connell). That conversation would lead …show more content…
"Hunting? Great Guns, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder." Rainsford exclaims as he finds out what the general has been doing this whole entire time and how people end up in such a place. Zaroff tries to imply that Rainsford was in a way doing the same while he was at war but clarifies that he was not a cold-blooded murder. In addition to the story and the film comparability Rainsford has no other option but to overcome the obstacles that are performed ruing his worst nightmare in the jungle. Rainsford became aware of what Zaroff was doing and claimed to call it the “ cat and mouse game” because he was knew that Zaroff was messing around with him when he could have easily killed him and Eve. The general would have fallen into a few traps but came to contact with hints that told him to do the opposite of what he was about to do. Like when he discovered the cave and instantly knew that his victims were trying to hide from him there. However, both of these interpretations of the hunting situations were not always