Eric argues that happiness is where you live and that it makes you who you are today.Eric travels to many different countries asking them what makes them happy. In Moldova many people have trust issues and have a hard time even trusting their own family members. He also travels to many different countries that are very interesting. Lastly, he travels to America and he feels America is the happiness county but is that true.
Eric argues that happiness is where you live and it makes you who you are today. I disagree with his argument because many people live in counties that are suppose to be happy, but they could be an out lawyers who are living in a country that is named for their happiness but they could still be unhappy due to their lifestyle. When Eric travels to different countries such as Moldova he describes that Moldova is a hopeless and powerless county. Many people that live in Moldova are unhappy because most of them have trust issues such as having no trust in their own family members and neighbors. I feel there are many people in Moldova that have trust issues, but I feel everyone should have someone to talk to about their life or …show more content…
Eric travels to many different countries asking them what makes them happy. In Moldova many people have trust issues and have a hard time even trusting their own family members. He also travels to many different countries that are very interesting. Lastly he travels to America and he feels America is the happiness county but is that true. I disagree with his argument because many people live in counties that are suppose to be happy, but they could an out lawyer who is living in a country that is named for their happiness, but they could be unhappy due to their lifestyle. I feel this book was an easy read and was very interesting because, he explained how many different counties are happy by living different lifestyles compared to
Eric argues that happiness is where you live and it makes you who you are today. I disagree with his argument because many people live in counties that are suppose to be happy, but they could be an out lawyers who are living in a country that is named for their happiness but they could still be unhappy due to their lifestyle. When Eric travels to different countries such as Moldova he describes that Moldova is a hopeless and powerless county. Many people that live in Moldova are unhappy because most of them have trust issues such as having no trust in their own family members and neighbors. I feel there are many people in Moldova that have trust issues, but I feel everyone should have someone to talk to about their life or …show more content…
Eric travels to many different countries asking them what makes them happy. In Moldova many people have trust issues and have a hard time even trusting their own family members. He also travels to many different countries that are very interesting. Lastly he travels to America and he feels America is the happiness county but is that true. I disagree with his argument because many people live in counties that are suppose to be happy, but they could an out lawyer who is living in a country that is named for their happiness, but they could be unhappy due to their lifestyle. I feel this book was an easy read and was very interesting because, he explained how many different counties are happy by living different lifestyles compared to