Equal Employment Opportunity Contract Case Summary

Decent Essays
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores is a United States Supreme Court Case. This case is about a Muslim-American woman, Samantha Elauf, who was declined a job at an Abercrombie & Fitch store in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She was refused because she wore a head scarf. This conflicted with the dress code of the company. These facts happened in 2008.

Elauf, 17 at the time, applied to work for Abercrombie & Fitch. She was wearing a head scarf during her interview, but she didn’t mention why. Heather Cooke, the woman who interviewed Elauf, was concerned Elauf wore the head scarf for religious reasons and mentioned it to the manager who responded that employees were not allowed to wear hats at work, and declined to hire Elauf.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Facts of the Case In Mitchell v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Co. the petitioner proposed a case against Abercrombie & Fitch stating that the defendant has violated both the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act. The plaintiff, Melissa Mitchell, has decided to pursue a lawsuit on behalf of herself as well as other affected members. The specific violations that arise from these two acts stem from Abercrombie & Fitch’s negligence with regards to paying Managers-in-Training and Assistant Managers the proper raised compensation of overtime pay (428 F.Supp.2d 725 (2006)).…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though there was an opportunity for Ms. Banafa to wear a headscarf in compliance with Abercrombie’s core colors in their Look Policy, this option was not explored, and instead, Ms. Banafa was passed over for the job because she did not suit the “Abercrombie look” (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 6 line 13). Since there are many ways to accommodate Ms. Banafa’s hijab without violating the marketing strategy, this does not qualify as a Bona-Fide Occupational…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Legal Analysis Union Pacific Did Not Discriminate Against Complainant on the Basis of Gender The Complainant raises two issues: 1) that she was denied a promotion and 2) dismissed from her position. She alleges that each of these events occurred based on her gender or for filing a prior complainant. She believes others were treated more favorably then she.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated in the concurring opinion, the rule is "When these two provisions are put together the following rule...results: An employer may not take an adverse employment action against an applicant or employee because of any aspect of that individual's religious observance or practice unless the employer demonstrates that it is unable to reasonably accommodate that observance or practice without undue hardship" (Equal Employment Opportunity v. Abercrombie and Fitch, 2015, p. 1 (Alito, J. concurring)). Justice Alito points out that even if in Elauf was to wear a scarf for other reason Abercrombie would still be held accountable for their actions. The accouterment does not allow discrimination of any…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Alabama V. Alabama

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Christian woman who was told to remove her headscarf for a driver’s license photo has sued officials of Alabama county, saying her faith convicts her to cover her hair. In December last year, Yvonne Allen of Tuskegee tried to renew her driver’s license, and she was told to remove her headscarf because “only Muslim women have the right to cover their hair.” On Tuesday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit on her behalf, saying the Alabama officials violated Allen’s religious rights, Christian Today details.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court found that A&F had not hired the individual because it did not want to accommodate the head scarf. The Court determined that this was an unlawful motive under Title VII. Following this decision, employers that reasonably suspect a potential employee will need a special accommodation and consequently do not hire the person, may be found in violation of Title VII. However, employers who know about the need for a religious accommodation but decide not hire the individual based on other verifiable reasons are not likely to be in violation of Title…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    9/11 Discrimination Case

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The way of women wearing hijab is the respect for their religion Islam. Everybody have right to get a job and work no matter what religion they fellow. This case help make Muslim know they are not wrong become better when they were facing a lot of rejection and discrimination. Women wearing hijab were more likely to be discriminate because hijab can see easily by people who think all Muslims are terrorists. Islamophobia has spread to many places, most employee see that Muslim with potential risk().…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adamson Case Summary

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Kentucky appeals court ruled on Friday that a Christian T-shirt maker did not discriminate in his refusal to print shirts promoting a gay pride event. In the court ruling, Chief Judge Joy Kramer stated that there was no evidence to prove that Blaine Adamson of Hands On Originals, a shirt-printing company, “refused any individual the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations it offered to everyone else because the individual in question had a specific sexual orientation or gender identity.” Kramer said that instead, Adamson was found to have objected to spreading the message of the group, rather than rejecting them based on their sexual orientation. “Nothing in the fairness ordinance…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Valeria Ramos HIST 1302 103 December 5, 2016 Equal Pay Act of 1963 The sixties was dominated by historical events that shaped present-day society. These events included the Civil Rights movement, the assassination of John F. Kennedy which resulted in the presidency to be assigned to Lyndon B. Johnson, the Bay of Pigs invasion, the Cuban Missile Crisis and lastly the Moon landing. The feminine mystique 16th street baptist church, four little black girls were at church when a bomb exploded killing them as a result.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Question 1: Identify and describe the specific issues Maalick encountered in the workplace. Do the actions of other workers at Trenton represent discrimination and harassment? What elements of law are important for Trenton to consider? Religious Discrimination & Harassment: Harassment and discrimination was evident in this case based on Maalick’s religion. Trenton has strong culture that provide avenues for employees to know what will and will not be accepted in relation to their behavior, workplace discrimination, and harassment.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Equal Rights Association is an organization, which strived for the equal rights of every citizen in the United States including women and people of colors. It was established in 1866 and based on the Eleventh National Women's Rights Convention. In 1867, on the first annual meeting of the American Equal Rights Association, they mainly debated that all women should be given the same rights as men were entitled and the black men and women should be given equal rights at the same time. After the civil war, slavery in U.S. was legally abolished, but the black people still had no right to vote, which stirred up fierce protests.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Equal Pay Act Case Study

    • 5387 Words
    • 22 Pages

    The 1970 Act only dealt with equal pay for the same work but in 1975 the EU directive on Equal Pay was passed based on article 119. In 1978, despite the passage of legislation to promote equal pay, women’s position in the UK was still worse than in Italy, France, Germany, or the Benelux countries in 1972. However, The Act has now been mostly superseded by Part 5, chapter 3, of the Equality Act 2010. The Equality Act 2010 legally protects people from discrimination in the workplace and in wider society. The act has made it against the law to discriminate against anyone because of age, being or becoming a transsexual person, being married or in a civil partnership, being pregnant or having a child, disability, race including colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin, religion, belief or lack of religion/belief, sex or sexual…

    • 5387 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Equal Pay Case Study

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1-Explain the notion of Equal Pay for Equal Work. What legislation contains this notion? (5 Marks) Equal Pay for Equal work means that men and women doing similar work are compensated the same. Similar work is defined as work that necessitates the same skill which is defined as the amount known education, physical or motor abilities required for the employee to effectively perform the job (Ontario). Effort is the physical or mental extortion to effectively do the job (Ontario).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The equality act 2010 is there to end discrimination that many individuals may have throughout life. This act protects individuals on the grounds of race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, disability religion or belief also having a baby, being pregnant, marrying or age. Under the equality act 2010 all the law about discrimination will be in one place however will be protected from discrimination like racial or religious discrimination. The act makes it easier for a disable person to show that they find hard to carry out task due to tests. The act states that they should make reasonable changes to buildings and provides aids.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout history, women have been making lower salaries than men. In 1963 an equal pay act was passed, fast-forward 46 years later, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay of 2009 was passed. Then in 2014, President Barack Obama signed two executive orders on equal pay. It is now 2016 and women have not yet achieved equal pay with men. Women 's average yearly salary is still less than men 's. Many have placed the blame on women 's lack of negotiation and personal choices.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays