The Four Theories Of Epistemology

Superior Essays
Epistemology can be simply defined as the study of knowledge and justified truth. Throughout this semester I was introduced to each of the different theories of epistemology and how they apply to different people’s lives. Epistemology involves a numerous amount of theories, but four of the theories in particular caught my attention. The four theories that I was able to directly and indirectly analyze were: the correspondence theory, nihilism, empiricism, and relativism. Each of these theories differ in many ways but, all have a solid explanation as to why they view truth and knowledge in life the way that they do. Although I agree and can better relate to only one of the epistemological theories, I was able to clearly understand the views of …show more content…
It also depends on the different standards that are right and wrong depending on a culture. This theory seems to be a really common one in my opinion because cultures differ all over the world in some of the most extreme ways. Each relativistic view is based on traditionalistic beliefs. For example, slavery is commonly used in some counties while other countries, like the United States, it is unconstitutional and morally long. Relativism involves many different types of views, especially in the United States, because we are such a diverse country as far as both culture and religion go. Relativism uses the question “What ought I to do?” This question is referring to what my society or culture thinks I ought to do, rather than having personal opinions. I personally disagree with the relativism question because they should be asking them self “what do I want to do?” This theory believes that you should always ultimately put your culture or society’s wants and desires before your own. This can result in one lacking individuality in many circumstances. The main weakness of relativism is that it can force someone to live a life that they do not actually agree with nor want for …show more content…
Empiricism is the view that your knowledge is based on experiences, observations and perception (Monton). Without these everyday experience, knowledge would be impossible. This epistemological theory is the most convincing theory to me, because we learn very valuable lessons from the biggest too little experiences. By learning from experiences, we are able to better understand knowledge, justify truth, and create a self-explanation when reasoning with truth. Empiricism gives reasoning because by experiencing something you are able to understand truth first hand. If you are actually able to observe something by experiencing it, you will know it must be true because you experienced it yourself. This theory provides a sense of self-relief for me because if I was able to experience it, then I must be able to confirm that it is indeed true. If we did not experience, we would never actually learn or be able to justify truth. The best way to prove or understand something in life is by simply experiencing it

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As we have accepted this belief we grow more accepting of the idea that there are no morals that are superior to others, nor rights or wrongs, moral relativism. Pojman connects these opposing beliefs by showing that people do not solely believe in ethnocentrism or relativism, but a mixture of both, even though people would rather define themselves as relativists. There is a certain pride that…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Evidentialism point of view appeals more to my sense of beliefs because I find it necessary to have substantial evidence in order to believe something. Furthermore I agree to the point that ones private belief can indeed harm someone in situations like the ship owners people own beliefs lead to the harm of others. Reformed Epistemology has an unwavering confidence in their beliefs that even when provided evidence that they are wrong they still chose to believe. Plantiga pointed out evidentialism inconsistency but that is due the restructuring of their beliefs based upon the new evidence gained. Evidentialism beliefs are malleable and flexible and change based upon the evidence given it disproves or reassure what they already know.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism fits in with the idea of basic human rights because it allows every person their own opportunities to make decisions based on their own opinion and act on those decisions. Rights like political, civic, social, economic, and most importantly life are just a few of the basic human rights found inside the United States. Stemming off from these innate rights there have been a wide variety of social…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    James Rachels: 1: Moral relativism is the perspective that ethical benchmarks, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and in this way subject to a man's individual decision. We can all choose what is right for ourselves. Moral Relativists call attention to that humans are not omniscient, and history is loaded with samples of people and societies acting for the sake of a trustworthy truth later exhibited to be more than error prone, so we ought to be extremely careful about constructing vital ethical decisions in light of a gathered supreme case. Absolutes additionally have a tendency to hinder experimentation and abandon conceivable fields of request which may prompt advance in numerous fields, and smothering the human…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    mention, “ relativism is initiated by recognition of the need to support opinions… Relativistic thinkers acknowledge that some opinions are of little value, yet reasonable people can also legitimately disagree on some matters.” (2010). My transition to relativism was due in part because it became vital to my college education to understand that not all classmates and coworkers opinions were credible and valuable to my educational experiences in that their individual knowledge was contextualized to their own perspectives and experiences. Others opinions would be held as valuable for my development based on my perception of their knowledge and the value I assigned to their opinions (D. Taub, personal communication, October 5, 2015).…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism can be subjective, which is the view that an action is morally right if one approves of it or it can be cultural, the view that an action is right if one’s culture approves of it. As long as a person has approval for an action it will be considered the right action for them to make. Not every relativist is going to have morally correct beliefs because what seems right to one person may seem wrong to another. For example, some cultures believe that there is nothing wrong with committing crimes such as murder, rape, stealing because this is what is accepted and seen as normal in their culture. When looking at criterion 1 of moral criteria of adequacy, this theory appears to be inconsistent with considered judgments because what one person approves of can be seen as immorally incorrect.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.0 Introduction “Well, dreams, they feel real while we’re in them, right? It’s only when we wake up then we realize that something was actually strange” (McCateer, 2010). Inception is a science-fiction movie, which was produced and directed by Christopher Nolan in 2010. ‘Inception’ as a concept refers to the situation when you plant an idea in someone’s mind without his or her knowledge of it happening (Rivera, 2012). The movie explores the ability to differentiate dreams from reality (Malcolm, 2010) and therefore looks at two branches of philosophy - metaphysics, and epistemology.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Correspondence Theory Over the last century, the world has become a place of everlasting technological advancement. The yearn for knowledge and advancements in academics has brought about an magnificent change in the world. Societies across the globe are rapidly changing and evolving due to new discoveries in the fields of knowledge, but many may ask the question: How can this knowledge be trusted? How is knowledge justified?…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How should we think about ethics? In order to answer this ultimate question, we must first understand the crucial concepts of ethics, but before we look into the concepts, it is essential to state the basic definition of ethic because the word “ethics” is the basis of the question. In our society, ethics is commonly defined as the study of morals, which are the standards of right and wrong that show humans what to do. Knowing this, we can continue with the concepts of ethics. First of all, we have to understand how knowledge about ethics is gained.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism is the belief that each culture defines their own morality and because of this we should not judge a cultures morality because one is not better than the other. Acceptance is a strength of relativism, because it could promote the idea that we are all different and we should all accept each other for who we are. Another of its strengths is allowing people to choose a moral code to live by and not be subjected to one way of thinking. However there are some downsides to relativism, for example promoting intolerance. Intolerance promoted due to the fact that if a culture is committing genocide relativists say that we are not allowed to judge them because that might just be a part of their culture.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the choice of research methodology, the researchers first have to choose one of the research paradigms like positivism, interpretivism, and pragmatism. Every research approach must follow the way of investigation such as epistemology, ontology, and axiology (Maxwell, 2005) as the essence of research philosophy. Therefore, I would like to follow the viewpoint of pragmatism as my research approach that should overcome some disadvantageous position of positivism and interpretivism, discussed below- Positivism refers to the emphasis on scientific observation as the way to see and understands the reality (Antwi & Hamza, 2015; Mack, 2010; Gray, n.d.) including statistical measurement to gain the factual knowledge about nature and natural phenomena (Edirisingha, 2012). These characteristics of positivism make the researchers independent (Dudovskiy, 2016) with minimal interactions with participants (Wilson, 2010) and limit to the survey method of data collection in observing empirical phenomena (Antwi & Hamza, 2015) rather than introspection (Byrne, 2005). The essence of axiology in positivism, as the researchers' judgment about the phenomena that is to be observed (Saunders et al., 2012), involves inquirer's value–free assessment (Li, 2016).…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As time passes, knowledge becomes more complex and philosophers start to develop different theories regarding how people come about this knowledge. There is a distinct difference between both Rationalism and Empiricism and both Descartes and Locke have found ways to discredit and support both views. Descartes argument towards Rationalism is much stronger than Hume's argument towards Empiricism. There is quite the distinction between both empiricism and rationalism. The major difference between rationalism and empiricism concerns their knowledge basis.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays