Epistemology And Moral Philosophy: Immanuel Kant

Improved Essays
Immanuel Kant was a promising modern philosopher born on April 22, 1714. He is considered to be the most influential figure in modern philosophy, with good reason. He sparked a philosophical revolution. Immanuel Kant gave his unique spin on epistemology, metaphysics, and ethics. Most of his ideas had never come up before. Immanuel Kant was a genius and ahead of his time. His philosophical points are still debated to this day.
Immanuel Kant’s stance on ethics differs from any philosopher before him. Before Kant, there were several prominent ethical theories which attempt to explain morality. Renown classical philosopher Thomas Aquinas thought all morals came from a higher being outside of our known realm of time and space. Aquinas came up with the Divine Command Theory (Moral Philosophy). As the name suggests, Divine Command Theory is the notion all morals come from a single divine being: a God. Kant objected to this notion of ethics. He says religion and morality have nothing to do with
…show more content…
The Formula of Humanity says every person has rights because they exist. “Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a mere means.” An immoral deed would be taking advantages of others for one’s personal gain. If one would be infringing on the rights of others, effectively treating them as means for improving their own quality of life, that act would be immoral by Kant’s Formulation of Humanity (Value of Humanity in Kant 's Moral Theory - Oxford Scholarship). Suppose an individual were to help somebody, however, the only reason they are providing assistance is to impress a nearby crowd. According to Kant, even though this individual was helping somebody else, their act is immoral. This is because the person being helped is a mean. He serves only to make the one providing assistance look like a good

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Otherwise, individuals are concerned about being evaluated negatively for taking part in the altruistic behavior, when the costs of assisting outweigh those associated to not assisting, and when people are unable to find out a person in need. Moreover, the bystander effect gives implication to reduce its…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, he begins chapter one with an argument that there is nothing that can be called good without qualification except for a goodwill. First, Kante says that gifts given to us by nature can have both a good and a bad purpose. For example, he explains that people wish for qualities such as wit and intelligence. Both can be used for good means like helping others as a teacher.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter one of Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant argues that human’s purpose is not happiness, mainly in order to further defend his previous claim that a good will can be considered good without any necessary qualification. Kant agrees with the principle that no instrument for any purpose would be found in a being unless it was the most appropriate instrument for that purpose. This is why he claims that nature would have made a grave mistake if it burdened reason with finding happiness. Happiness, he writes, could be “attained far more surely by instinct than it ever could be by reason”. Instinct seems to mesh much better with finding happiness than reason does, as reason can cause desires to be skewed, while instinct…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In such a case, the act is viewed as being charitable. Therefore, charity does not require that one gives aid but instead one ought to give when they consider it important. However, the stronger principle implies that one has a duty to give to the poor in affected countries. Perhaps many of us do not agree with such a statement. It is true there are individuals in the world living in harsh conditions who require our hel…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people who attempted to save Nathan Cirillo’s life didn’t intend for the praise that they got yet they still embraced it. This act from my standards cannot be deemed altruistic because the first responders unintentionally had personal gain from this tragedy and that can be viewed as an egoistic act. Each person has the choice between acting in a way that can be perceived as either egoistic or altruistic. Personally I believe that peoples actions are a mixture of both. For example; helping an old woman across the street can be perceived as an altruistic act, yet in the fact the person helping the woman out if thinking about the possible reward they shall receive from the woman after they have helped her.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will discuss Kant’s moral reasoning, both broadly and in terms of a case study, and elaborate on some issues with Kantian ethics. The core of Kant’s ideas on morality is his statement that "nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good without qualification, except a good will". He defines this good will as “the will which acts from freedom and respect for the moral law”, meaning that one must choose by their own volition to pursue morality. Kant believes the only purely good thing is this idea of good will. In saying this, Kant draws a line between good will and traits like happiness, wealth, and even health that are usually thought to be good.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, moral worth is a key element to defining what makes a moral being. As per Kant, just reasonable creatures can be said to act ethically. The thinking for Kant is the same for all people; at the end of the day there is not a needy individual's reason versus a rich individual's reason. All people are equivalent as normal ethical beings. In this manner, if reason manages that one individual, in a specific circumstance, has an ethical obligation to complete a specific thing, at that point any individual, in that same circumstance, would similarly well have an obligation to do that same thing.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of true altruism, it is important that the person you are helping have no relationship to yourself. This is a crucial part to selflessness because you have nothing to directly gain from handing a homeless person a dollar on the street or going to a third world country to help build schools or homes, besides joy in helping other people. These selfless actions can be supported by Rachel’s argument which is that though it is very rare for a truly altruism act to occur, it is not selfish to want to help other people. Rachel’s argues for this by saying “We must first want to help them before we can get any satisfaction out of it. The good feelings are a by-product; they are not what we are after.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant believes that there is a specific standard to morality that it is based upon. Morality is…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Samaritan's Dilemmas

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    We care about others and help in ways in which we’re able. Stone believes that those people who promote self-interest are disconnecting us from the desire to care for others. She makes the argument that democracy does not rely on self-interest, but altruism, and that the human psyche is equipped with the need to help people and connect ourselves to something larger. The “Samaritan’s dilemma” is the challenge one faces when deciding how to deal with the poor. In the first chapter, she discusses the two views of help.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Love Definition Essay

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, some friendships and doing an act of kindess goes with a situation wherein it tends to be selfish and profit seeking. For an instance, a close friend needs money for hospital bills, a friend who has this Phileo type of love will help with willingness without asking or expecting something back from them, but sometimes being drowned by gratitude can start a conflict within friendship. The other one cannot decline because his or her friend had helped him even though he knows that the favor he or she is asking from him is not good. Despite other situations similar to that, if one’s friendship is really important for the both of them then personal interest must not…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strived to make morality and the same principles compliment all beings and make them view the world in only one way, his way. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that believed morality is based on reason and not passion and it could be provable by reason as well. Kant’s ethics are all based off of the fundamental principle of morality, which comes with the freedom of your character and helping people, which was morally correct in his viewpoint. Kant speaks about the idea of freedom and the fundamental principle of morality. He explains that the reason that people are promoted to accomplish the correct action is because of freedom.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays