Epicurus's Beliefs

Improved Essays
Epicurus argues that death is nothing to be afraid of, “For all good and bad consists in sense-experience, and death is the privation of sense-experience.” Epicurus believes that everything in the world is made up of atoms, and the space that atoms move in is called the void . Everything that is intangible belongs to the void, “And the void can neither act nor be acted upon but merely provides motion through itself for bodies.” Thus, Epicurus argues that the soul is not part of the void as it can act independently, and hence it is tangible and made up of atoms. The atoms of the soul reside in our physical bodies, and give us sensations. We make meaning out of these sensations to form perceptions about what is good and bad, and hence Epicurus

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Abdulkabir Adejumo Professor Escalante PHILO 1301 11/2/2017 Response Paper 1 “Do We Survive Death?” In this interesting chapter, James Rachels starts by uncovering the philosophy of Socrates about the immortal soul. At that point, he utilizes the scientific argument to conflict with Socrates' conclusion about the presence of the soul as a piece of the human body.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Rid yourself of false beliefs” is an appropriate characterization of Epicureanism for the following reasons. Epicurus like Aristotle believed that the highest good is happiness however unlike Aristotle he believed that the path to happiness is pleasure. The main reason Epicurus associated happiness with pleasure is because people do everything for their own sake or their own pleasure. Everything we do in life is for our own pleasure. This can clearly be seen in infants.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Epictetus Case Study

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Epictetus has good view of wisdom in this particular case. I like how he described whatever in life is taken away from you, somehow you will get it back. His thought of wisdom make sense, I shouldn’t complain that I should have taken some classes last summer, then I wouldn’t have so much pressure this summer by taking twenty credits. If it didn’t happen that time, I got another chance in this summer to take these classes and graduate.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to both Epicurus and Patch, a life filled with content is sought through the harmony of the body and the world, as well as appreciating the small delights of life. In “Letter to Menoeceus”, Epicurus advises his audience to “[secure] health of body and tranquility of mind, seeing that this is the sum…

    • 1097 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that death annihilates identity and identity ends when the body ends. Human are necessarily mortal; even if they’re put back together after death, it would not be the same because the only thing that makes an individual themselves is the unity of the identity and body. When the connection of these two break, there is no putting them back together. Epicurus has the notion that “good and bad consists of sense-experience” (164). Death is the annihilation of those experiences.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Evolutionary defence of the Epicurean’s argument that pleasure is the highest good My argument is that from the standpoint of evolution, hedonism is the most valid theory of the ‘good life’. The scope will be narrowed down to Quantitative Hedonism (Bentham, 1789), as there is only one kind of pleasure and its worth is measured on dimensions of intensity and duration. This essay will first lay out the importance of this view and its major positions which it stands for. After which, objections against Hedonism (from Aristotle and Cicero), and the Evolutionary perspective will be discussed.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    PBS Argument Analysis

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    He explains that without the thoughts behind our decisions we cannot truly live a happier life, because we do not understand why we are doing what we do. Epicurus was worried about the anxieties in life and wanted his friends to understand where the main source is. He wanted people to understand that there is a connection between happiness and thoughts. In all honesty, thoughts are ideas that individuals have as a result of a mental activity.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first point made as to why death is not a bad thing was that when you die, you don’t experience pain, so there is no point to fear it. As Lucretius says, “Death, then, is nothing to us and does not affect us in the least”(Book 3, 830). Their…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Epictetus's Analysis

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Living a life without having thoughts or even trying to make sense of the world that is constantly evolving would not be a life worth living. In order to have a fulfilling life, people must have developed thoughts about the way they are living their lives. Knowledge gained through reasoning could make people good, wise, and happy. Epictetus, a Stoic philosopher, would argue that people could never fail to be happy as long as they learn to differentiate what is in human power and what is not. The only way to differentiate what is in human power and what is not is through reasoning; throughout Epictetus’ discourses, he elaborates on how to differentiate these things and how people should reason in a manner that will bring them happiness.…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If I had to choose how to live my life, and my option was as Epicurus said, “ascetic lifestyle promoted.” Because, Aristippus believed that by being flexible he could make the most of things. Other Greek philosophers looked him down upon by other, who saw him as being enslaved to his passions, but he believed that his flexibility, and open defiance of social conventions, allowed him to be truly free. He explained that his best is not abstaining from pleasures, but instead controlling them without being controlled. Of course, that is not the life that I want for mi in any…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus Argument Analysis

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In discussions of death, a controversial issue has been whether death is bad for the person that dies. According to Epicurus and Rosenbaum, humans should not fear death because they are unaware of their death and therefore death cannot be bad for them. According to Nagel, however, says death is bad for the person who dies because it deprives that person of all the good that life can bring them. Therefore, they disagree on whether death is implicitly bad for the person that dies. Epicurus argument goes as follows:…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus Bad Argument

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Epicurus believed that death was a neutral event and that a person ceases to exist at the moment of death. Death is considered neither good or bad by Epicurus and his followers, but it is important to remember the distinction between dying and death. Dying could be considered a “bad” state of life since Hedonists regard pain as the only “bad” and pleasure as the only “good” in an individual’s life. This is not the case with death – based on what Feldman calls Epicurus’ termination thesis – as Epicurus states that “death is nothing to us” and that events in our lives without significant meaning should neither be feared nor treasured. According to Epicurus, death was cessation or termination of experience and existence.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Letter to Menoeceus”, Epicurus argues that pleasure is the only essential good that people seek. He argues that pleasure is the only thing that people should pursue for its own sake. In this paper, I will make that the argument that pleasure or pain’s absence are not the only things worth pursuing for their own sake. Epicurus—a psychological hedonist—argues that “the end of all our actions is to be free of pain and fear” (Epicurus, par. 6). To summarize his argument, he states that pleasure is the ultimate result of all of our actions.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also said that death couldn’t be good or bad because those feelings only comes through conscious and real thoughts. This is the main reason I do not agree with Epicures. I believe that death is bad for us because of the fact that we cannot experience…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Epicurus Vs Augustine

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Epicurus, a scientific philosopher, based his beliefs on life around his scientific theories and observations. Augustine, a theological philosopher, believed in everything through the Catholic God and was deeply rooted in his faith. To fully incorporate both of these doctrines into everyday life would be impossible. The two belief systems conflict each other greatly, but in some respects, they can be used together to find philosophical truth. Both philosophers had radical ideas about the gods and rejected the common religious beliefs of their time.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays