Hobbes Right Of Nature Analysis

Improved Essays
The Right of Nature and the Law of Nature are both similar concepts described in Thomas Hobbes’ work Leviathan. These are both theories that explain what people are or are not allowed to do. The Right of Nature allows people to use their own power no matter what, so long as they deem the reason necessary. This is similar to the concept of the Law of Nature, except that in the Law of Nature they are allowed to do anything so long as it preserves the lives of themselves and others. The Right and Law of Nature, though they may seem to be old concepts, are still very much alive in today’s society (Hobbes, n.d.).
The Right and Law of Nature Throughout History: The Right of Nature: Absolute monarchs throughout history are classic examples as to
…show more content…
There are laws preventing people murdering others in order to gain control, and generally people will be caught for the things they have done wrong. Even though this is the case, the Right of Nature can still be seen anywhere from corporate offices, to inside the government. An example of this would be within the American military system. Americans and many other countries are essentially at war against terrorism and against the islamic extremist group „Islamic State of Iraq and Syria“, or better known as ISIS. To many countries in the world this group is seen as a threat. Executing their natural rights, it is morally acceptable to kill not only the leaders in this group, but normal people as well. They are also people, but since they are members of the opposition, it is seen as being an okay thing. This is what Hobbes talks about in Leviathan (Hobbes, n.d.). The idea that a person, or a government, can use their power as long as they deem it as …show more content…
Not only was Hobbes the person who came up with these concepts, but he was also one of their strongest critics, talking about how corruption would become a possibility were it not for the laws limiting the power that one person was able to have. These extents of these limits and how much they really cover in today’s society is evident and shows just have much more work the world truly does have to reach Hobbes’ idea of The Law of Nature and limit the amount of corruption that the world experiences on a daily

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4) What does Meng tzu mean by “a heart sensitive to the suffering of others?” Why does he claim that this defines our humanity, and why does it need to be developed if we are to be ethical or truly humane? What are the other three “seeds” which make up the “sensitive heart,” and how do they become developed? Why is the development of each a necessary part of humaneness?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How does Hobbes’s view of nature shape his political theory? Political theories make suppositions about nature and/or natural laws. These boundaries (including the behaviors of the people within it) shape actions and decision-making, and the rules of nature thusly form the foundation of the ideology. It is prudent to analyze in-depth this basis for the moral and political philosophy of the great thinkers. The assumptions must make sense if the overall theory of thought built upon this foundation is to hold up.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I truly believe that genetics are by far one of the biggest factors in determining the action and/or morals of an individual. In this debate, I personally agree with Thomas Hobbes in the idea that the nature of man is evil and as he states, “Everything humans beings voluntarily do is for pleasure or for self-preservation.” I feel this concept is heavily shown through the fact that all human beings react differently if put in the same situation. This shows that even though one's environment will be the same as someone else’s, people's personality determines the morals and decisions made by said individual. For example, some criminals have safe surroundings and good environments, but still make the conscious decision to commit a felony.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (1 pt.) Hobbes’s opinions on the state of nature are that people are constantly fighting with others for more power. Hobbes says that the “three principal causes of quarrel” are “competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory.” He also states that The first maketh men invade for gain; the second, for safety; and the third, for reputation”.. Lastly, he says that this giht for power is like a war between men.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “For a while, the constraints of civilized society keep things peaceful, but soon their system unravels into brutal chaos” (Pojman, 67-68), this is an excerpt that Pojman discussed pertaining to the novel Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding. This quote exemplifies Thomas Hobbes idea on the state of nature and how there can be no structure and stability without a governing force. Another philosopher that challenges Hobbes’ ideas is John Locke, who believes humans would be capable of keeping stability and structure without the social contract to the government. I will prove how Hobbes’ idea is significantly better than Locke’s theory by talking about equality, liberty, rights and morality. I completely agree with Thomas Hobbes and how humans would be incapable of governing themselves which is why we need social structure.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why does Hobbes consider men equal in the State of Nature? Why does this eventually compel men to form a commonwealth? Hobbes describes a State of Nature as a society with no official government. This means that people would decide for themselves; how to conduct themselves, if someone is guilty of a crime, and if they are guilty of a crime, how they should be punished.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Concepts

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is by this that natural law is justified in its application, that is, because there exists certain fundamental concepts of right and wrong in…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘In the social sciences, the most general concept of power links it to the ability to achieve a desired outcome’ (Heywood 2004). Power is a heavily contested concept amongst humans and has always been present within political thought throughout all eras. It is, in most cases, outlined as the capability to impose authority upon both individuals, and the masses within a state or territorial region, in order to control or influence decisions and their effects. This essay will discuss the similarities in the analysis of political power between two key philosophers from the 16th and 17th century who are thought to have founded features of modern-day political science. Both Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes specialised in theorising the idea…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Views On Rebellion

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He believed that society in order to be successful had to be ruled by a strict system of government such as absolute monarchy. In Hobbes’s dissertation “The Leviathan”(1651) a book where he expresses his views he explains that a law of nature was "a precept, or general rule, found out by reason, by which a man is forbidden to do that which is destructive of his life” (Hobbes, 1651, ch14/XIV, p. 64). The law of nature was a broad principle which was discovered through experience and expected to be to be followed in everyday life. These laws encouraged self preservation and disapproved any doings damaging or negative to human life such a rebellions which could result in civil…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in society the government is supposed to protect everyone’s core values. The rationality behind the concept of destroying someone else’s life because they may eventually take your property does not work with government. The government will intervene after the crime is committed not because one suspects it will eventually happen. If all people in a society, abiding by the natural law can destroy any threat they see to themselves, then a cycle will begin and never end. Each man will continue to destroy someone who they suspect is a threat until the entire society is destroyed except for one man.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction “Rights are difficult to define because of their foundation in natural law, which is a notoriously ambiguous concept.” The concept of rights from the perspective of natural law theorists, which denotes that the foundation of rights is derived by the virtue of moral principles and human beings reason, is a notoriously ambiguous concept. In other words, human beings, by way of practical reasoning, possess certain moral rights. Therefore, natural law theorists argue that law and morality are co-extensive.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, it is necessary to leave the state of nature once established the foundation of human life, that is, there's only independent individuals, it is necessary to build a consistent political society with such budgets. To make this work, Hobbes uses the concept of state of nature. He claims the existence of state of nature that are actually laws to achieve peace. natural law contained very basic and obvious moral precepts, of which no one doubted obligation. Instead, Hobbes conceives rather as technical rules that serve to an end, but not oblige because an obligation has to have some unconditioned…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays