Why did Fukuyama claim that the conclusion of the Cold War marked the “end of History”? Do you agree?
Fukuyama had claimed that History had ended after the collapse of the cold war in a Hegelian dialectic sense, however Fukuyama did not intended as the end of new ideologies nor convergence of socialism and liberal capitalism system, “”End of History (1989) but that market economies and liberal politics will replace the marxist communist ideology, Fukuyama’s bold claims were based on the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the Deng Xioaping’s China opening its doors to liberal economies after the death of Moe Zedong that changed its communist economic plans as well as the non industrialised countries in the Third world revolutionaries for …show more content…
Hegel had argued before that History had ended in 1806 in a since that “ the real world did not conform to or could be made to conform to ideological preconceptions”. Fukuyama (1989).to there was no new ideology and the relationship. Hegel, Immanuel Kant had written essay in 1784 called an idea for a universal history from a cosmopolitan point of view. Kant argued that “human history was on continues warfare and crudely” (1784) Kant has suggested that Human history will have end point where man kind will realise total freedom, society will achieve “ a perfectly just civi constitution and universalisation of mankind’s rationality progress towards freedom, liberty and equality in civil society that creates republic government, as well as ending of slavery” Kant argues that history had come to an end point and that mankind was leading to create liberal democracy”. Fukuyama (1990)??? Hegel like Kant argued that Universal history “gives an account to progress of knowledge, institutions and the changing nature of human beings”. Hegel argued that mankind had no fixed nature and hunan progress would not continue to evolve, Hegel suggested that history ended in 1806 after the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte the principle of liberty and equality did not end with the defeat of the French armies. Societies had become free and continued use to these principles, However it did not mean there would not be new events that occur within societies. Hegel believed that mankind would “progress to higher level of rationality and
Fukuyama had claimed that History had ended after the collapse of the cold war in a Hegelian dialectic sense, however Fukuyama did not intended as the end of new ideologies nor convergence of socialism and liberal capitalism system, “”End of History (1989) but that market economies and liberal politics will replace the marxist communist ideology, Fukuyama’s bold claims were based on the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the Deng Xioaping’s China opening its doors to liberal economies after the death of Moe Zedong that changed its communist economic plans as well as the non industrialised countries in the Third world revolutionaries for …show more content…
Hegel had argued before that History had ended in 1806 in a since that “ the real world did not conform to or could be made to conform to ideological preconceptions”. Fukuyama (1989).to there was no new ideology and the relationship. Hegel, Immanuel Kant had written essay in 1784 called an idea for a universal history from a cosmopolitan point of view. Kant argued that “human history was on continues warfare and crudely” (1784) Kant has suggested that Human history will have end point where man kind will realise total freedom, society will achieve “ a perfectly just civi constitution and universalisation of mankind’s rationality progress towards freedom, liberty and equality in civil society that creates republic government, as well as ending of slavery” Kant argues that history had come to an end point and that mankind was leading to create liberal democracy”. Fukuyama (1990)??? Hegel like Kant argued that Universal history “gives an account to progress of knowledge, institutions and the changing nature of human beings”. Hegel argued that mankind had no fixed nature and hunan progress would not continue to evolve, Hegel suggested that history ended in 1806 after the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte the principle of liberty and equality did not end with the defeat of the French armies. Societies had become free and continued use to these principles, However it did not mean there would not be new events that occur within societies. Hegel believed that mankind would “progress to higher level of rationality and