Employment At Will Doctrine

Improved Essays
Employment At Will Doctrine: Employment at will is one of the legal doctrines that protect the right of the individual. According to (Halbert/Ingulli 2012) “which gives employers broad discretion to fire employees for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all” This doctrine is very straight forward and it protects both employees and employers. Employees may not be fired for refusing to do the wrong or illegal things, race, gender or sexual orientations. Employment relationships are presumed to be at-will in all US states except Montana. The US is one of a handful of countries where employment where employment is predominantly at-will. Most countries throughout the world allow employers to dismiss employees only for cause. At-will also …show more content…
The understanding of employment-at-will doctrine will make it easy for me as the COO will make it very easy to legally fire or not all the six employees. I will be dealing with problems one, three and six.
I. I will fire John immediately and legally the company has the right to fire any employee that does not have the authority legal authority to represent the company, so whatever he has written will damage the relationship with the most important customer of the company. John is not covered by any of the exceptions that guide the employment-at-will doctrine.
II. Bill can be fired at will and that is what I surely will do. I will fire Bill immediately as the company equipment should only be used for company business and not for private business. Bill is using the company’s BlackBerry to run private business that is against the company’s policy. Bill has broken the company’s rule and violated the company’s policy and he can be fired legally. He is not covered by the exceptions provided by the employment-at-will
…show more content…
One of his responsibilities was designing a foundation plan based on the copyrighted architectural designs that were provided by his employer. In 2010 Adam was given a plan that had a black stamp that stated “If this stamp is not red it is an illegal set of plans” The plan also stated ” Reproduction of these plans by any means is prohibited by federal law” Adam refused to work on the plan because it was illegal and this prompted his employer to fire him and he was escorted out of the building. Adam filed a claim for wrongful dismissal for wrongful

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Donn Milton Case Summary

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    IITRI removed the case to federal court and successfully moved to dismiss Legal issue and Question: Donn Milton's wrongful discharge action against his former employer, IIT Research Institute (IITRI), raises two legal issues: the choice of law to govern Milton's claim and the viability of his claim under that law. Legal Answer and who wins: The court held judgment of District Courts dismissing Donn Milton's wrongful discharge action against his former employer.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case citation Daniel Dickens v. Alliance Analytical Laboratories, LLC, 111 P. 3d 889; 2005 Wash.App.433 Factual background and procedural posture AAL is a L.L.C found by Ms. Anne Cote and Mr. Gary Lukehart in 2001. At the beginning, Ms. Anne Cote approached Mr. Gary Lukehart with a business plan to start a chemical company in Yakima, Washington and a disclaimed that she was very wealthy. AAL has two members, Ms. Cote and RSRT, L.L.C, which was found by Mr. Lukehart for the sole purpose as a member of AAL. Both Ms. Cote and Mr. Lukehart were named managers at AAL.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Avoid Religious Discrimination in HR Perspective Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, “employers must reasonably accommodate employees’ sincerely held religious, ethical and moral beliefs or practices unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the employer” (EEOC). To provide religious accommodation, employers are supposed to offer adjustments to the work environment to avoid or solve conflict of employees’ religious belief and practices with workplace requirements. Common religious accommodations include flexible working time, modifications of policies, and job reassignment. From HR perspective,…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Allen Lopez Case Summary

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The respondent became frustrated with the alleged unfair treatment of lower-level employees and created and published a critical website speaking against the management practices and the discrimination of a fictional company that had astonishing similarities to the petitioner. The website gained publicity from the media and high-tech websites. The petitioner held a meeting with the executives to decide whether the respondent should be fired and whether legal action need to be taken to have the respondent’s website removed for the internet. The petitioner and the respondent have agreed to have their case resolved in arbitration and will adhere to the ruling handed down.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    New Mexico Case Study

    • 5213 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Appeal was taken from an order of the District Court, Bernalillo County, Richard B. Traub, D.J., reversing a decision of the Unemployment Security Commission and awarding benefits to discharged employee. The Supreme Court, Sosa, J., held that employee’s insubordination, improper attire, name calling and other conduct evidencing wilful disregard of employer’s interests constituted ‘misconduct’ disqualifying her from receiving certain unemployment benefits. Reversed. Attorneys and Law Firms *576 **697 Heidel, Samberson, Gallini & Williams, Jerry L. Williams, Lovington,…

    • 5213 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the textbook, an employment at-will “allows the company or the worker to break the work relationship at any point in time, with or without any particular reason, as long as in doing so, no law is violated (325).” The company is going to claim that Charlene was fired because her one mistake cost them thousands and thousands of dollars and if this occurred once then it could occur again in the future. They will also state that her contract extended the first three years because her work performance those years were satisfactory. However, this year her performance was not good and did not meet their expectations and therefore had to let go of her because she was costing them money instead of bringing in money. If the organization keeps an employee who cannot do their job then not only is the organization harmed but also the employee.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Specifically, she wore a head scarf which was problematic because A&F’s dress policy prohibited head wear. The primary issue in the case was whether the company could be liable if it did not have actual knowledge of the need for accommodation. A&F argued that it did not know that the individual needed an accommodation. However, the Court held that under Title VII it did not matter if the company had knowledge of the religious status of the individual so long as the motive for not hiring the individual was based in any way on the individuals religion.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Id. The court will likely find that Travis, with authority to terminate, displayed a sufficient negative attitude towards the employee’s protected class and…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In most states, the law assumes that private sector workers are hired "at-will. The employment-at-will doctrine provides that mutually the boss and the employee can end the service relationship at any time minus notification or cause. Such means the manager has the mandate to dismiss the employee any time for any reason or no reason at all or a bad motive, provided the reason is not unlawful - even if one’s performance has been exceptional (Muhl, 2001). On the other hand, an employee can resign from a job for any reason any time. He or she cannot be forced to work for the boss.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The judicial branch states that employees can only be protected under issues of public concern. This can cause innocent people to lose jobs simply because they fought for what they believed in. The…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The current law allows non-binding dispute resolution procedures which would be ineffective if either enacts the terms or conditions agreed upon. In this case, the law does not make the agreement enforceable that it is just advisory of what to do. How can anyone use this system without each party to be forced to the terms they agreed upon? The employer will have free reign to do as they choose.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning The Box Essay

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If the defendant sued in either of these cases, I believe that the business could easily defend themselves as to why they terminated the employee. The reason is as simply as safety and protection against other…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1.1ist the aspects of employment covered by law There are many aspects of employment which are covered by law. These include data protection act, confidentiality of employee information, wages, sick/holiday pay, health and safety and DBS. 1.2List the main features of current employment legislation There are a number of features of current employment legislation. From the main features are employment rights, equality and discrimination and health and safety.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137, 122 S. Ct. 1275, 152 L.Ed.2d 271 (2002), Mr. Castro was fired for his organizing activities, which he was unlawfully terminated (“Undocumented Workers”., n.d.). “The National Labor Relations Board, the agency that administers the NLRA, ordered the employer to cease and desist, to post a notice that it had violated the law and to reinstate Mr. Castro, and to provide him with back pay for the time he was not working because he had been illegally fired (“Undocumented Workers”. , n.d., p. 5.) .”…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, there are laws which prohibit employers from discriminating people based on nationality, gender, religion or race. However, the law does not cater for sexual orientation and therefore it is legal for employees to discriminate people based on sexual orientation. The employers can also fire or fail promote employees based on their sexual orientation. There are states which prohibit employees from discrimination people based on their sexual orientation but a majority of the people, but in most of the states, the employers have the freedom to entirely refuse to employ or fire people who are gays or lesbians. Many companies have passed their own laws which prohibit discrimination of the employees based on sexual orientation and other policies which also prohibit discrimination based on gender identity (Kuper, Nussbaum & Mustanski, 2012).…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays