Emotional Distress In Tort Case Study

Improved Essays
Topic - Evaluation of Emotional Distress in Tort Case: Legal Framework
The two parties seen in tort cases are the plaintiff and the defendant (Fotte & Lareau, 2013). The plaintiff is the person who has filed an alleged tort whereas the defendant is the person who has caused harm to the plaintiff (Fotte & Lareau, 2013). In civil lawsuits there are three types of relief they are monetary compensation, specific performance, and an injunction (Fotte & Lareau, 2013). An injunction refers to preventing the defendant from taken action whereas specific performance refers having the defendant do something or something that he/she should have done (Foote & Lareau, 2013). Monetary compensation refers to receiving money from the defendant for damages

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From Sweethearts to Sour Tarts, Millionaire Matchmaker Sued The dating scene has changed dramatically over the course of a few years. With more people having access to the internet, online dating is no longer something the desperate or insecure; everybody is dating online. As more people date online, the need to weed out the bad apples from those people who are truly looking for love becomes obvious. When it comes to people who have money, they pay elite matchmakers to weed out the individuals who may not be compatible with them.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The actor cannot be a mere stranger. Kentucky Fried Chicken Nat’l Management Co. v. Weatersby, 607 A.2d 8 (Md.1992). To prove a causal connection between the conduct and the emotional distress plaintiff must have adequate evidence that distress is directly attributable to actor conduct. Moniodis v. Cook 64 Md. 1(Ct. of App. 1990). The distress does not have to be imminent.…

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When people undergo medical procedures, they put their lives in someone else’s hands. Though everyone deserves the highest standard of care, medical negligence is a very real problem around the country. If you sustained new or worse injuries because of a healthcare professional’s negligence, Cronin Fried Sekiya Kekina & Fairbanks in Honolulu, HI, will help. At Cronin Fried Sekiya Kekina & Fairbanks, they help clients pursue justice from doctors and hospitals for gross negligence and misconduct.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exact Time Limit to Bring Medial Misconduct Case in Court In accordance with Illinois medical negligence law, the claimant has up to two years from the moment the he became familiar or should have become familiar of the injury to start a court case according to the Act of limitations. Additionally, under not any circumstances does Illinois health care misconduct law let a patient to start a court case more than four years later than the health care misconduct occurred as a result of the statute of repose. Illinois also has a unique Act of limitations for claimants who have small age at the moment the medical misconduct took place. Anybody aging less than 18 years has up to eight years as time limit to file a court case, on condition that the legal proceedings are started prior to the claimant becomes 22 years old.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Margolin Vs Novelty Now

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mr. Margolin’s lawsuit would be better addressed if he files it within the proper jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is the power of the court to render a decision about the case in question. In this case we have the potential for three jurisdictions, California, Florida and/or New York. Although, Mr. Margolin filed suit against Novelty Now Inc. in the state of New York, the most appropriate jurisdiction would be in California.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Eeoc Case Study

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Protected Activity- Filing a formal complaint of discrimination or harassment with EEOC is a protected activity. Rebuttable Presumption: facts, that are accepted by a court until it is proved to the untrue. Relief Sought- Plaintiff must identify the damages or other relief sought in their complaint or pleading.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As a founding partner of the personal injury attorney firm Foley & Small in Rochester, IN, Attorney Edmond W. Foley continues his mission of fighting for the legal rights of people who suffer harm when individuals or companies commit wrongful acts. For more than 30 years, Attorney Foley has provided his clients impassioned and effective legal representation. His experiences cover single-injury cases to mass tort litigation against major corporations. Born in Missouri, Attorney Foley earned his accounting degree and his law degree at the University of Notre Dame. He graduated from the law school cum laude in 1979, and is a certified public accountant.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case, the emotional and physical distress Mr. Hailey was in was brought on…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Settleman Settlements

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A settlement is a cash offer that is given to the victim of a personal injury lawsuit as a compensation for the losses and damages that are either monetary or physical. Also, there is an extra reward for the pain and suffering that the victim has gone through. In cases of wrongful death lawsuit, the family members of the victim are entitled to the cash for the funeral and for the trauma that they experienced.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Reform Case Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Finzen (2003, Feb. 11), “The tort reform campaign has gained much wider acceptance, however, in the jury box. Many jurors now treat as self-evident the notion that the nation is plagued with “frivolous” lawsuits and outrageous jury verdicts. The rich and greedy plaintiff's lawyer has become a part of American folklore” (Finzen, 2003 Feb. 11). In this paper I am going to be talking about the relevant law of this case, the applicable facts of this case, and whether this case suggests the need for tort reform. Relevant Law of This Case…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Summary

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Under California law, the first aspect that must be established in a negligence case is the existence of duty. The existence of duty depends on “foreseeability of risk.” If there is a foreseeable risk, then it becomes the duty of an individual to adhere to solving it. If the individual fails to resolve the issue, and someone is harmed, that individual could then held liable for the incident. (6 Witkin, Summary of Cal.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral distress is defined as an inability to act according to one’s ethical principles by the moral agent due to various influencing external constraints such as time pressures, organizational, legal, and/or authoritative barriers (as cited by Ulrich & Hamric, 2008). According to de Veer, Francke, Struijs, and Willems (2013), nurses often experience moral distress due to the inadequate staffing, job pressure, higher societal demands, and conflicts between institutional rules and one’s moral values. Moral distress can lead to disturbing consequences, such as burnout, turnover, fatigue, frustration, physical illness, anger, powerlessness, and a host of other worrisome and painful outcomes. The moral distress I had experienced is when my patient walk against the medical advice (AMA). I took care of a middle-aged Native American woman, who was admitted to the adult surgical floor after an angiogram.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While I always knew there was a difference in the types of legal cases such as criminal and civil, I was not aware of Tort law. According to Lau & Johnson (2011). “A tort can be broadly defined as a civil wrong, other than breach of contract” Simply stated, a Tort is some type of civil wrong that causes harm or loss. These law suits are brought for reasons such as personal injury, consumer protection or defamation.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Reform

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Group of ideas are designed to change an underlying liability rules in the civil justice system, tort reform. Tort reform often alters the cultural aspect of civil litigations and makes it difficult for the plaintiffs’ to do the following: a) whom to file the case against, b) filing a lawsuit, c) obtaining an enormous amount of money for their suffrage, and etc (Daniels & Martin, 2000). Even though, tort reform makes it difficult for the injured person to sue a company, expecting millions of dollars for every claim is ridiculous. Ramseyer and Rasmusen (2010) mentioned about McDonald’s Coffee incident when Ms. Liebeck received $2.86 million for a coffee spill. If McDonald’s keeps satisfying every injured person with the money they demand, their business will be penniless.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The injured person must have suffered an injury that can be remedied by money damages, which is the legal term for monetary compensation.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays