Emile Durkheim Individualism And The Intellectuals Analysis

Decent Essays
Emile Durkheim was a multifaceted man whose ideologies covered various subjects. Durkheim used his own knowledge as well as information gathered from other sociological pioneers to better reiterate any points he was trying to convey. In Individualism and the Intellectuals, Durkheim starts by stating a concept that has gathered society as a whole. The idea of being transformed has divided the country at that particular time. Durkheim believes that it is a simple question of what being transformed is and as time has passed on, transformation in itself has become more generalized. Transformation in society has been a topic of discussion that has consumed many, and Durkheim is stating that many have passed the concept and have now transcended onto …show more content…
Individualism requires one to know what they exactly know. “This is why, when it comes to calling upon certain men to rally themselves to an opinion which is not their own, it is not enough, in order to convince them, to recall to them that commonplace of the banal rhetoric that society is not possible without mutual sacrifices and without a certain spirit of subordination.” (ED p. 50) Durkheim explains that individualism is not only revolutionary, it is also a set of beliefs that can solidify unity within the country. Religions exterior is superficial, according to Durkheim. Just because a religion has symbols, priests, or temples does not mean that someone is relegated any kind of authority. The beliefs and the practices combined forged a type of authority. Society cannot be coherent if there is not a relationship between intellectuals and the “moral community”. The belief that religion is an individualistic ethic relies upon rationality. Durkheim gives the example of Christianity as a religion and how it demonstrates internal faith, conviction of one’s self, and religiosity. One is taught that that is needed to be measured by …show more content…
It allowed for one to develop a more rational conception of individualism that is more freely thrown around in Durkheim’s day rather than in times before. Religion cannot be jeered without defiance that has some kind of repercussion. According to Durkheim, religion is the one thing that can bind us together, and a weakness cannot exist without inception of communal separation. Everyone is connected no matter what. If you were to contradict yourself and reject one, then you would need to reject yourself since we are all connected. An “organ” of life is the only instrument given in life that provides a channel to the "end".. What is the point in caring in a such a thing if the end is associated with it? Durkheim suggests. The concept that the belief of individualism is tied into the individual. “In reality, the religion of the individual was socially instituted, as well all know religions. It is society which fixes for us this ideal as the sole common goal which can rally our wills.” (ED p.54-55) Durkheim explains that all religions were socially constructed and the beliefs associated with them are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This analysis follows Durkheim’s theory that religion has three major functions. These functions are that of religion promotes social cohesion by uniting people together, religion promotes conformity by encouraging people to obey cultural norms, and religion gives meaning to purpose an life. For Reza in Iran, the social norm was to follow islamic beliefs and be muslim. But in order to escape war, Reza and his family immigrated to the United States. This geographical move introduced a different culture and social norms causing Reza to back away from his culture, ethnicity, and religion.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Actors Society is constituted by human beings. Although sociologists seldom endow agency to individuals, they still describes some of the actions of the actors in their works. The two theorists here are French theorists, who have tendency toward bestowing less agency to the actors as most French theorists do. However, their discussion cannot lose the part of actors if they want a whole picture instead of a partial one. In my view, albeit Durkheim and Foucault are similar at putting less emphasis on the actors and giving them less power, they are different in identifying and investigating the actors.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I must preface this section with the acknowledgement that my personal experience with various religious practices is fairly American, with some variety thrown in due to recent immigration. Even so, in America alone the practice of religion has great variety on the some main themes. I agree with the theorists that religion as a practice does seem to follow the direction of social support and convenience. I see some evidence for Marx’s socialist proposals to apply to religion as well.…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personal Religious Beliefs

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Personal religious beliefs can be defined as the constitutional protection which is against compulsory immunizations. Accordingly, it can be defined as the reality of the mythological, supernatural or spiritual aspects of a religion. According to, (Gibson, & Randall, 1988), religious belief is distinct from the religious practices with some believer’s not practicing religion as some practitioners not believing religion. There are several forms of religious belief as acknowledged by, (Josephson, & Peteet, 2004), including; universalism which can be explained as the situation where by individuals believes that religion cannot be separated from other aspects of life. Orthodoxy is another form of religious belief which closely follows the edicts,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Brave New World, Huxley shows how an extremist, government "society" has destroyed social individuality. The citizens of the society lose all ability to truly feel emotions and be an individual. Hemholtz, Bernard, and John, are a few of, if not, the only symbols of individuality that the World State has yet to conquer. Community in the World States, calls for unity and one-mindedness.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Sacred Canopy Analysis

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Role Religion has on Social Structure The Sacred Canopy by Peter Berger offers a way to gain new perspectives on how we construct different realities in society for ourselves. Berger didn’t seem to be interested in convincing us that religion is a spiritual phenomenon, but rather he offered a perspective on how religion plays a role in our social life. This is because we live in a world that places value on cultural aspects.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Emile Durkheim’s book The Division of Labor in Society, there is a passage, on page 312, in which he writes about the division of labor, solidarity, and spontaneity. I will break down what these three terms means to him and what he was trying to convey to his audience, at the time. Durkheim believed that solidarity is what made a healthy, organic society. An organic society, to him, was one where there was still inequality, but more specifically, natural inequality. He saw there being two kinds of inequalities.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Religions create a common moral understanding for all participants to be able to coexist. Emile Durkheim and Jonathan Haidt theorize how religion operates as a society and the consequence of intergroup conflict. To maintain a unified group, individuals must lose their self reasoning and work only for the benefit of the group which leads to decisions that an individual would not make. Durkheim explains how religious beliefs and practices function to foster societies. Although the idea of a society is solely inside the individual’s mind, there’s a…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim are two of the founding figures of sociology. They were the first to explore the relationship between the economy and society in the nineteenth and twentieth century, each developing different perspectives of society. Despite them having significantly different views on modern capitalism, they both played a prominent role in the development of sociology as an academic discipline. This essay provides a biography of Marx and Durkheim and the major works they published. It then focuses on the intellectual and historical contributions they have made and how their works are still influential to contemporary society.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlottesville: A Durkheimian Perspective Introduction Emile Durkheim plays a pivotal role in the field of sociology. His innovative research paved the way to new theories that help us explain and understand the way society works. Durkheim is responsible for numerous contributions to the field of sociology, but is often known for his theories on collective conscience, solidarity, and anomie. Collective Conscience Collective conscience denotes the interest of the collective level of society (Emile Durkheim). Durkheim's theory on collective conscience refers to the “totality of beliefs and sentiments common to average citizens of the same society” that “forms a determinate system which has its own life” (Durkheim 38-39) or collective representations.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The investigation of individual experiences, beliefs and conducts which are shaped by social forces, is the main aim of social science. But Social theories consist of diverse and often contradictory approaches about what is social science and what methods and presuppositions should sociologist take into consideration when they study the social phenomena (Kadakal, 2013). The aim of this essay is to present the main ideas of Durkheim and Weber, two of the founding fathers of social science, through their studies persuaded to examine the social issues which occurred in Europe during the 19thcentury. Firstly outlined Durkheim’s positivist empirical method of studying the social reality and his main ideas of his works ‘The Division of Labor in Society…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Crime Beneficial to Society? By Christy Evans 8/30/17 French sociologist Emile Durkheim’s position on crime is that it is normal to a functioning society. He believed that by defining what is deviant, we are enabled to know what is not, and hence to live by shared standards. Durkheim thought that deviance promoted social unity and moral boundaries.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    From the things as personal as our religious practices, to our public workplaces, our lives revolve around the beliefs and norms that are imposed on us without our knowledge. French Sociologist, Émile Durkheim (1964), explains that the vast majority of our thoughts and behaviors are not actually our own. In reality, the ways in which we “choose” to live our lives are actually dependent on societal conventions. Thus, conformity to and deviance from social expectations are the result of one’s desire to prove their humanity. People who conform do so in order to be perceived as “normal” because normality is seen as sign of humanity.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim was able to take someone 's individual behavior and study and understand it within a social context. Durkheim theory help take solitary acts and allow people to expand it to see a connection with the larger society by pointing out the influence of group and social forces on the…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why do groups of people need a religious system in order to form stable cultures and societies? In his address before the Farmington Trust, philosopher Edward Goldsmith argues the importance of religion as a control mechanism for a stable society. He discusses a philosophy in which, “(Religion) provides a goal, whose achievement must ensure the society’s stable relationship with its environment, and a means of achieving this goal, i.e. a ‘hierarchical organisation of instructions or guidelines.’” (Goldsmith) In order to illustrate this organization, provided for by religion, and vital to a stable society, aspects of Ancient Greek culture are highlighted.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics