Embryonic Stem Cells

Improved Essays
Stem cells are cells in all organisms that undergo a process called differentiation which is the process of growth or development to becoming something different. Stem cells work together to later become of use in areas of need such as tissue, muscle, or organs. Unlike stem cells, which have gone through one stage of differentiation, embryonic stem cells (ESC) can easily provide more of a variety on what they can become and be used for later in life. Consequently, embryonic stem cells have been in the central of debate in ways such as its ethics and how it should legally stand between the government and its research. The public, some with the mindset of opposition claim that stem cell research is unjustly in killing the unborn. Moreover, …show more content…
As a result, allowing for the government’s help to fund the research of stem cells, they can ultimately save lives, create alternatives to regenerative medicine and expand stem cell research. Thus, ESCs can essentially benefit the public as it shall be more widely accepted and held to the same standards and guidelines as adult stem cells.
While adult stem cells are a benefit for recreating the body’s needs such as tissues and organs, embryonic stem cells range in a much different area that these cells can not reach. Since adult stem cells are so limited based on what they are (blood cell, nerve cell, tissue cell and etc.) there is only so much they can recreate. One example being that blood cells can only differentiate to become either white or red blood cells and nothing more. Since embryonic stem cells are sought out in reaching high hopes to potentially saving lives, scientists wrote that “the property [making] them so “unique and interesting” is called potency meaning that the cells still have the potential to differentiation” (Issitt and Donnelly). This would allow for a remarkable opportunity of being able to create a vast amount of cells when desperately needed. Another attribute that differs between somatic
…show more content…
Since the ban on stem cells set by president George Bush, in 2001 called the Stem Cell Policy, embryonic stem cells have not received the attention they deserve, which has restricted the limits of researching stem cells. Morally, it seems unreasonable to be taking a human life in return to save a life for those out there without a home are un-abled and deemed as unworthy. Envision a helpless child limited by what he/she owns and the amount of money their family or they makes. Stuck in a situation where they could have had so much to offer; to our environment, society, and even day to day lives. (Take a look at figure

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The cell is the building block of life. The earliest form of these organisms are called stem cells, which can give rise to potentially any kind of cell. The possibilities of these revolutionary cells are vast, and are currently being applied in many scientific fields, one being the medical field. Stem cell scientists study a four to five day old organism, a ball of one hundred and twenty cells, which has the potential to give rise to a human being. Many think that the protection of human life should be extended to these cells. However, because of its known probability of saving millions, stem cell research should be continued because embryonic stem cells have shown strong evidence to treating many debilitating diseases since they were discovered,…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem cells are cells that have the ability to differentiate into many different types of specialized cells. However, stem cells are not where the controversial and ethical debates come from (NIH). Embryonic stem cells are the potentially life saving, while life ending, solution that flares controversial debates from scientists, religious leaders, politicians, and everyone in between. Embryonic stem cells are stem cells derived from an human embryos that are around five days old and have the ability to reproduce through cell division as well as differentiate into any type of cell (NIH). Embryonic stem cell research has great rewards with the possibilities of cell based therapies and cures of more than ten life altering diseases, but also has great consequences of cell rejection and the destroying of human embryos (NIH).…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic Stem cell research has killed many kids and more to come if we do not stop it. Stem cell research can be done with a stem cell from embryos, fetuses, and adult cells. The National Institutes of Health researched to see which would be easiest to use in laboratories. They found out that embryos would be the easiest because they will stay in a underfered state longer than the other cells will. Which means that they are not classified as any type of cell. Stem cell research kills humans, violates the boundaries between generations, benefits off of other people's wrongdoing and there are other ways of getting cells than endanger the life of a baby.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The diseases are increasing, and so are the cures. The most deadliest diseases from the past no longer remain as dangerous. Yet new diseases emerge. And scientists are trying to find a cures to these new diseases, by sacrificing new lives. “Is it important to kill new lives to save other lives?” is the question embryonic stem cell research poses. Embryonic stem cell research is an attempt to use embryonic stem cells to find cure for diseases. Although science has found cure for many diseases in last few years, it is not possible to cure every single disease. Thus we should not be killing embryos, to cure disease. As we are finding cure to the deadliest, we are also planning to kill lives by using up embryos. While it might save lives, embryonic stem cell research should not be allowed because it is against all the religions, lives should not be sacrificed to save another life, and it is doubtful that a single cell has potential to save lives.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In August of 2001 President George Bush announced that federal money could go to researched working on already developed embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines. Among the scientists these lines were referred to as “presidential lines” because there are only 21 viable lines. With such a small number of lines it limits genetic diversity of the stem cells. This is a big problem because without genetic diversity how are the doctors and scientist suppose to help a specific person and their illness? Another problem with the presidential lines is, they are very old and they do not age up to expectations. Chromosomes in the cells go through some changes over time, which messes with the ability of the cell to stay “normal”. In all honesty the presidential lines are wasting the time of scientists and the government 's money. In 2006 President Bush vetoed the bill to expand funding for human ESC research. Scientists and doctors have been able to get around the presidential lines by using private biotech ways of funding. The people that have a different way of funding are free to create and destroy as many lines as they can…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Very complicated processes must be used to obtain stem cells for both research and use in labs. Extracting stem cells from blastocysts within an embryo sacrifices a life and often times destroys the embryo. One life must be given up with every embryonic stem cell used in research or even treatment. (The Stem-Cell Debate 1) For us to use one single embryonic stem cell we must sacrifice one future. developing life. (although that life would only be developing a few days) During our research process we would use thousands of cells to support their hypothesis and confirm it is safe. As great as scientists preach using stem cells, they are not the amazing perfect solution in life. In fact, they have incredibly strong moral views/ positions connected to the research and use of stem cells. There is just as much holding them back as they have keeping them…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem cell research is a controversial and sensitive topic that has been debated for over two decades. Millions of people every year die from diseases and accidents, such as cancer or Alzheimer’s. Even though there have been medical advancements in the treatment of cancer, most of them cannot cure cancer completely. However, stem cells has the potential to completely cure many diseases and creating new immunizations. Dr. E Donnall Thomas began stem cell research in 1956 when he performed the first bone marrow transplant. The best source of stem cell is from human embryos. However, embryonic stem cell research is seen as especially unethical because researchers need to kill essentially very young embryos in order to obtain these stem cells. Embryonic…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The scientific belief is that 14 days after the process of fertilization, the central nervous system is in place, and that the fetus has a heartbeat. If the stem cells are removed from an early embryo prior to 14 days, it cannot develop and become a human being, which is why the more popular argument has people thinking: “If the research is just discarding embryos that would be left to die, why not put them to use?” (Fox, N.D.) Most people believe that the science regarding stem cell research is ultimately “Playing God”, and resulting in threats that are made daily to the researcher and the preservation of human life, when in reality science and medical professionals are looking at every possibility for aiding “responsible” research in hopes to expand new treatments, and could probably improve the health of the human population. The goal is to distribute any amount of satisfaction to current or future patients in America and…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The University of Nebraska’s Medical Center describes stems cells as, “an unspecialized cell that has yet to “decide” what type of adult cell they’ll be,” (What Are Stem Cells). This idea drives the research of biologists and medical professions because it grants them the opportunity to improve degenerative diseases and aid to new finds of medicine. Although many doctors believe stem cells could potentially help solve many of todays medical mysteries, a vast number of the population believe that stem cell research is highly unethical. People find stem cell research to be unethical because its research involves destroying human embryos. Essentially, there are three types of stem cell research: Adult Stem Cells (ASC), Induced Pluripotent Stem…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many ethical arguments for and against stem cell research and therapy, regarding issues such as the types of cells, the sources and techniques of production, and use of them. There are few concerns about research on or therapeutic uses of adult stem cells. However, embryonic stem (ES) cells have been associated with serious ethical debates. The use of this new science and technology for human reproduction has prompted ethics and policy disputes around the world. There are studies done that confirm the complexity of the issues raised by stem cell research. These studies put forward main themes, such as: theories/views on policy development, issues with focus on science and health, issues related to the supply of embryos, non-embryonic…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For example, many believe that from the moment of conception, the mass of cells is a human. And it seems cold, but at the early stage of development from which the stem cells are taken the embryo is hardly human. Many of the groups who are against this research are affiliated with the Church, who believes this research would be abortion. This is the biggest issue that faces stem cell research, but there are other, smaller debates surrounding the groundbreaking research: There has been a discussion of potential issues, such as the passing of viruses or a donor rejection ("Stem Cell"). While this could potentially harm people, researchers have already found solutions. Another reason for the debate surrounding stem cell research, and their application in medicine, is people’s weariness of their ability to regenerate endlessly (Eve et al.). This is because the same ability to regenerate endlessly that makes them so valuable in regenerative medicine could make them deadly due to a potential mutation that would allow them to turn cancerous (Eve et al.). But new studies using malignant embryonic carcinoma cells - a cell very close to the stem cell- show that by putting the cells under retinoic acid (which comes from Vitamin A) treatments which forces the cells to differentiate into human neurons, which would allow biologists to “turn off” their dangerous properties (Eve et al.). Furthermore, it could be argued that stem cells only mimic other malignant cells and have no cancerous qualities themselves(Eve et al.). Like all new scientific discoveries, stem cell research and their use in medicine still have kinks to be worked out before they are perfect. Thus, more research would be necessary to stop the mutations of stem cells (Eve et…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem Cells: Good Or Bad?

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Claim: Stem cell research and use is a bad idea because stem cells come can kill unborn children, stem cells also are bad because cures should not depend on the killing of an unborn child, when you use stem cells for a cure it can be unstoppable and you can die from tumours that form, and finally for the final reason is stem cells can get you hurt in many ways.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the contentious debate between endangering a fetus to scavenge embryonic stem cells or to capture adult stem cells, most people find themselves at a crossroads to what is proper. But before deeming the morality of this typically taboo subject, there must be some type of understanding as to what stem cells are and how they are used. To begin with stem cells have the exceptional gift of being able to differentiate into numerous types of cells depending on how far along they have matured. There are three different types of stem cells, but only two are prevalent, embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells. Set side by side these cells can be discerned by acknowledging that embryonic stem cells come from fetuses…

    • 1316 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hearing the words “stem cell research” can yield thoughts of mad scientists, aborted embryos, “playing God” and unethical medicinal practice, those however are not factual assumptions. These ideas have been pumped into our heads by negative and selective news outlets that only expose us to the nitty-gritty bits about this euphoric, and potentially life-saving, new science. So what is all the fuss really about? Stem cells. These cells specialize in conjoining to form a certain part of the body, ie. liver, skin, muscle, bone. Two types of stem cells are: somatic (adult) and embryonic. Somatic stem cells are found in various parts of the body for example, within bone marrow, skin, muscle and even in the blood. They developed to replace dying cells…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “For the scientist, the goals are advancement of knowledge and treatment of disease” (Bobrow). For scientist their main goal is to advance their knowledge of a particular subject, in this case stem cell research. Scientists are always searching for knowledge of things that are yet to be known, but sometimes that quest for knowledge can lead to a not so noble end. Stem cell research is something that has the potential to be useful or detrimental. Scientists cannot predict all the possible outcomes of this experimentation. There are currently no guidelines or boundaries for the research on stem cells. Scientists at this point have not been given strict guidelines or protocols that they have to follow. They have lost sight of the facts that they are experimenting on embryos that have all of the functions to be considered alive. Scientists are more concerned with advancing the general population, than the rights of the embryo. Another concern with stem cell research is that scientists do not know the long term implications of this experimentation. “At present, scientists still know very little about how stem cell differentiation is controlled” (Murnaghan). One thing that could prove to be out of the scientists control is how stem cells differentiate. There is no way to know the long term effects of stem cell research, because this research is in its…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays