According to the Washington Post, about forty-two percent of protests are actually successful. Throughout the whole book of Ella Minnow Pea, by Mark Dunn, many civilians decided to rebel against the council, thinking they would make a change for the better. The most prominent way people rebelled was by breaking the law, which we saw in Ella Minnow Pea, many people purposefully went against the law, some secretly while others were overt. Although some believe that acts of rebellion can prompt change, in reality it brings disorder. According to Mark Dunn and “American Oversight”, rebellion can lead to violence and thus can hurt society, while compliance brings stability and cooperation, leading to order and safety. Throughout Ella Minnow Pea,
…show more content…
contains, below the masthead and the aforementioned title, the frenetic repetition of a certain letter. [Tassie speaking] I do respect Mr. Kleeman for his protest, yet am disappointed by the cowardly exit” (29-30). Mr. Kleeman believed if he rebelled by putting the forbidden words into his writing, that it would make a change. His rebellion against the government ended with him being banished, and didn’t have an impact on the rest of the society. The government didn’t change the rules. The people who complied with the law, got no punishment. With this act, he brought more consequences to him and the society than he would of, if he would have complied. There is one person, Tassie Purcy, throughout the whole book who continues to rebel against the council. From the letter ‘z’ falling, to the last letter, she believed the council values were wrong. She had many different approaches to rebel, but the biggest act she did to rebel was “relaying threats to the Council”. Each counciliteur has gotten a copy: “cease the insanity or you will perish” (127). As more and more letters fell, the less patient civilians and Tassie got, and the bigger the rebellions were. Even with all the rebellious acts, she didn’t prompt any …show more content…
Capitol. . . The rioters pushed past severely outnumbered Capitol Police officers, breaking windows and vandalizing offices, many with disturbingly violent intentions toward members of Congress. . . Five people were killed.” On January sixth, people’s actions brought more harm to society than had a good impact. People got injured, and some even killed, because some citizens decided to rebel against the government. Even with rebels, nothing changed for the better. The “protest” started out civil, people were just using words to fight for what they wanted, but soon after, the “protest” turned into a riot. Some say that “Trump supporters for weeks openly discussed their plans for a violent overthrow.” Many people died that day, for what? After that day, nothing came in favor of the people who protested. This shows how being a rebellion only brings more consequences to society, than if people would just comply. Throughout history, it has shown that the people at protests who decide to rebel, cause more damage to society, from destroying buildings to hurting people, and it rarely promotes
contains, below the masthead and the aforementioned title, the frenetic repetition of a certain letter. [Tassie speaking] I do respect Mr. Kleeman for his protest, yet am disappointed by the cowardly exit” (29-30). Mr. Kleeman believed if he rebelled by putting the forbidden words into his writing, that it would make a change. His rebellion against the government ended with him being banished, and didn’t have an impact on the rest of the society. The government didn’t change the rules. The people who complied with the law, got no punishment. With this act, he brought more consequences to him and the society than he would of, if he would have complied. There is one person, Tassie Purcy, throughout the whole book who continues to rebel against the council. From the letter ‘z’ falling, to the last letter, she believed the council values were wrong. She had many different approaches to rebel, but the biggest act she did to rebel was “relaying threats to the Council”. Each counciliteur has gotten a copy: “cease the insanity or you will perish” (127). As more and more letters fell, the less patient civilians and Tassie got, and the bigger the rebellions were. Even with all the rebellious acts, she didn’t prompt any …show more content…
Capitol. . . The rioters pushed past severely outnumbered Capitol Police officers, breaking windows and vandalizing offices, many with disturbingly violent intentions toward members of Congress. . . Five people were killed.” On January sixth, people’s actions brought more harm to society than had a good impact. People got injured, and some even killed, because some citizens decided to rebel against the government. Even with rebels, nothing changed for the better. The “protest” started out civil, people were just using words to fight for what they wanted, but soon after, the “protest” turned into a riot. Some say that “Trump supporters for weeks openly discussed their plans for a violent overthrow.” Many people died that day, for what? After that day, nothing came in favor of the people who protested. This shows how being a rebellion only brings more consequences to society, than if people would just comply. Throughout history, it has shown that the people at protests who decide to rebel, cause more damage to society, from destroying buildings to hurting people, and it rarely promotes