Marianne’s interaction in the social setting is used as a saturation of these restrictive values by displaying feminist tendencies. In a flagrant defiance of the standards of female behavior of her time, Marianne embraces in the pleasures of the outdoors and “her skin was very brown”, rejecting the Georgian ideals of sheltered women. In addition, Marianne’s usage of unrestrained speech and emotional expressiveness at soirees is Austen’s manner of countering the societal proselytization of an imbalanced power system. When she expresses interest in Willoughby following their encounter on her walk, Sir John teases her: “You will be setting your cap at him now” he says in jest (36). However, Marianne condemns this view of women as superficial seekers of wealth, as well as reduction of women the “conquest” of a man (36). To her, these statements are” the most odious of all” for they reduce women to inferior beings without the capabilities of thought and passion (36). Her daring to criticize a man—one in possession of a far greater wealth, position, and age than she—further supports the critique of Georgian
Marianne’s interaction in the social setting is used as a saturation of these restrictive values by displaying feminist tendencies. In a flagrant defiance of the standards of female behavior of her time, Marianne embraces in the pleasures of the outdoors and “her skin was very brown”, rejecting the Georgian ideals of sheltered women. In addition, Marianne’s usage of unrestrained speech and emotional expressiveness at soirees is Austen’s manner of countering the societal proselytization of an imbalanced power system. When she expresses interest in Willoughby following their encounter on her walk, Sir John teases her: “You will be setting your cap at him now” he says in jest (36). However, Marianne condemns this view of women as superficial seekers of wealth, as well as reduction of women the “conquest” of a man (36). To her, these statements are” the most odious of all” for they reduce women to inferior beings without the capabilities of thought and passion (36). Her daring to criticize a man—one in possession of a far greater wealth, position, and age than she—further supports the critique of Georgian