Elie Wiesel Acceptance Speech Analysis

Improved Essays
On Wiesel’s acceptance speech of 1986 he stated that “when human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. Wherever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion, or political views, that place must –at that moment – become the center of the universe.” Considering the events that occurred in World War II, such as the Holocaust, I strongly agree with Wiesel’s statement about making those who are endangered our priority. It is mankind's duty to protect and liberate anyone who is being oppressed or suffering, despite any circumstances, or terrible things can happen. If no one steps in to help, the oppressor will believe they are right in their actions.
This same type of horrible silence happened even in America. During the middle 1800's, the Native Americans were viewed as "a savage and inferior race" by the white man, who would "invade, plunder and murder" any Indians who were troublesome (Irene ustrek) . This is exactly like what happened to the Jews. Hitler believed that the Germans were the inferior race and
…show more content…
This is also evident in the second war the US was fighting in World War II, Japan. Americans had an idea that all Japanese Americans were spies relaying secret information back to Imperial Japan, so they rounded up all the Japanese and put them in Internment camps. The Japanese Americans "were incarcerated for up to 4 years, without due process of law or any factual basis, in bleak, remote camps surrounded by barbed wire and armed guards" (PBS). The internment were very similar to the concentration camps, and America's action was very similar. Many Americans knew about the camps but no one did very much to try to stop them. They tried to forget about them, focusing their efforts elsewhere. Instead of fixing the problem, they ended up creating one of the darkest times in American

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Battles are occurring frequently between the major powers of the world. Due to all the carnage and bloodshed happening on the battlefields, countries are not able to help those stuck within the concentration camps. Among many other prisoners, Elie Wiesel feels abandoned and isolated as he fears that the rest of the world forgot or did not care about the…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Society was composed of three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders,” Elie Wiesel stated in his “The Perils of Indifference” speech given on April 12, 1999, at the White House. In his speech, Wiesel discusses the indifference that the Jewish people experienced during the Holocaust. Weisel was taken by the Nazis in 1944 at the age of 15 and spent about a year in various concentration camps, including Birkenau, Auschwitz, Buna, Gleiwitz, and Buchenwald. Throughout his time in concentration camps, Elie witnessed the cruelty between strangers, and even sometimes between friends and family. Elie explains to the audience the dangers of being indifferent in “The Perils of Indifference”.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Complacency is Cooperation Throughout the late 1930s and early 1940s, the citizens of Europe looked on as millions of Jewish people were killed, segregated, and discriminated against. The world may never know the exact reasons people did not intervene, but conclusions can be drawn from the information available. This issue is addressed in Elie Wiesel’s memoir, Night, on numerous occasions. Despite some people believing that no one interfered because the people of Europe were afraid, Weisel demonstrates that there were other justifications given by the communities living directly outside some of the worst concentration camps. To begin, there must be a basic understanding of the situation.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He starts by addressing President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, members of Congress, Ambassador Holbrooke, Excellencies and friends; his main focus was on the President and the American citizens. He tells a story of a Jewish boy from a small town who lost his family due to the Holocaust in Buchenwald. Then, moves on to indifference and why it is tempting. Wiesel says that indifference is dangerous than anger and hatred because indifference does not have a creative side whereas, anger and hatred can have a positive side. He uses the story of St. Louis as an example of indifference, around 1,000 Jews from Nazi Germany due to war were forced to leave the place in a ship headed to United States.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wiesel’s exploration of inhumanity is portrayed through his protagonist Elie, himself. We are given an insight to inhumane effects the concentration camps have on the Jews, especially Elie when he is witnessing his father being abused. When one of the guards beats his father, although knowing that he could possibly help his father, Elie simply chooses to watch. Wiesel expresses the strength of his inhumanity when he mentions that he “thought of stealing away in order not to suffer the blows”. Here, Elie puts himself before his own father, whom is getting beaten.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim” (Wiesel). A true statement made by Elie Wiesel, one of the survivors of the holocaust, he decided to tell the world what happened, he decided not to become a bystander because silence can never help the victim. The consequences of silence can be seen everywhere but in the fictional story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and the non-fictional story the “Ruling in the Scottsboro Trial” by Judge James E. Horton we can clearly see how silence made a huge difference in someone else’s life and in Elie Wiesel's nobel prize acceptance speech we can appreciate how silence can make you guilty. We can not be innocent if we are bystanders, we have to speak for those who stay silent, it is our…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On April 12, 1999, Elie Wiesel gave a speech titled, “The Perils of Indifference” in the White House to share his experience during the Holocaust during World War 2. Wiesel and his family members were forced to live in Auschwitz extermination camp. During these times, he faced various hardships and struggles until he was rescued. In this speech, Wiesel gave an effective speech by using various rhetorical strategies to convey his personal beliefs on the world and how much it has affected him. To begin, Wiesel uses credibility and personal experiences to capture the audience’s attention to gain trust from his audience.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Night Persuasive Letter

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dear Mr, Elie Wiesel. My English recently finished your book "Night", one of the few survivor stories of the Holocaust. The Holocaust is the epitome of genocide, which always begins with an idea and like a wildfire, it grows. I've had a chance to observe this mentality amongst others. Discrimination among differences still exists.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He then asks the timeless question, “What about the children” (25). By appealing to the base instinct in every human being Wiesel makes his audience of government officials, professors, students, and anyone else that watched fear their consequences and want to change because they’ve seen the effects of indifference and don’t want innocent children to go through the same struggles as the children in war-torn countries. By questioning, Wiesel makes his audience…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Elie Wiesel Right

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When someone is persecuted by their race, religion, or political point of view that place must become the center of the universe attention I agree that Elie wiesel was right. Elie wiesel is right because when some one lives is in danger for their beliefs all the humanity should put attention at the place because human lives are in danger because at the time is not your live but that can happen to you and you will need some help and the Jews at that time needed or help. We did not put attention because is was not harming us and we had or own problems the great depression and we knew that the Jews were in danger and Egland was right next to them do not did anything because there were rebuilding because they were bombed in WWI.The holocaust…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When an individual is in danger and his or her life is at risk,everything else surrounding him or her does become irrelevant. People are scared of the differences among other human beings and find it peculiar. For that reason, those people become a great danger to the others thoughts and become the center of attention. For example, like Elie Wiesel said in his acceptance speech, an individual’s surrounding become irrelevant when facing a conflict and only then, it becomes the center of attention. Different kinds of tragedies are happening all around the world that make us be afraid of humanity.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Germans main goal was to make the German race the superior race and they did not care how far they had to go to achieve this goal. Wiesel can neither explain nor understand the reasons for human cruelty that he witnesses and endures during the Holocaust, but learns that cruelty breeds more of the same and in the end survival and self-preservation is all that matters. Before the Jews were sent to concentration camps, life was still very unfair for them. Before the Holocaust even started Jews were…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Analysis of Nelson Mandela’s Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela was the son Hendry Mphakanyiswa the tembu tribe chief and South African farmer .Nelson Mandela later became the most prominent figures the leader of the fighting against apartheid. He also was the longest imprisoned member of the African nation Congress (ANC). As a result of his fighting and resisting to the white minority rules in and out of prison he was awarded Noble peace prize.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elie Wiesel, a writer and Holocaust survivor says during his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” This idea states that the act of keeping quiet and not questioning an immoral authority only gives power to the oppressors. By speaking up for what is right, the power is given to the people to repair an unjust government.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When a horrific tragedy is reported on the news, Americans may feel remorseful, but only temporarily. The thought is quickly pushed out of the mind as they are consumed with other, less important things. Rather than donating to charity, volunteering, or giving aid to the homeless, humanity looks on. This is not a recent development; Americans have been apathetic to tragedies since before World War II. Elie Wiesel, a man who became a human’s rights activist after residing in Buchenwald and Auschwitz for two years at age fifteen, spoke at the White House about The Perils of Indifference during the 1999 Millennium Lecture series.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays