Negligence Case Summary

Improved Essays
In this paper, I will discuss and evaluate the potential liability in the case of Bobby’s double hands amputation with emphasis on the elements of negligence of this case if any. I will also discuss comparative negligence and its application to the analysis of liability. In this case, I do not see any potential liability or other forms of torts against Bobby or Racheal. Bobby and Racheal are young children who are trying to have fun but it was unfortunate that Bobby unintentionally cut his wrist while playing basketball.
ACE Sports: I believe that ACE Sports should face a potential product liability. Cornell University Law School defines product liability as, “Product liability refers to the liability of any or all parties along the chain of manufacture of any product for damage caused by that product” ("Products Liability", n.d.). Based on the determination of defect in their product which resulted into Bobby’s injury, that is, small pieces of metal sticking out of it.
These metal pieces sticking out will serve as a concrete evidence against ACE Sports in the court of law. ACE Sports should also be charge of negligence under the element of “causation”. According to "Elements of a Negligence Case" (2014), “Under the traditional rules in negligence cases, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant 's actions actually caused the plaintiff 's
…show more content…
Duty as an element of negligence means that the defendant owned a duty to the plaintiff if a relationship is established between them ("Elements of a Negligence Case", 2014). In this scenario, a nurse-patient relationship was established and the failure of Nurse Williams to fully perform her duty can be considered negligence. Conversely, it can be argued that parental consent is needed before health care can be provided to minorities which might explained the reasoning behind Nurse Williams’

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A successful claim of negligence must include certain elements of tort. This includes that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care, that the care was breached by negligent conduct, that this breach caused damage to the plaintiff and that this damage was reasonably foreseeable, and the damage is quantifiable (pg. 5 of the negligence pdf). In order to satisfy the first two conditions The plaintiff must first establish, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendant omitted an action which a reasobable person of equal standard, that is of physician special skills, would do and this omission falls below the physician’s duty of care. Dr. Andrews owes such a duty of reasonable care both to his patients and arguably to third parties,…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff shall claim that the actions of defendants’ were intentional which caused harm by personal injury, that resulted in loss of financial stability and career sustainability, which was not insignificant and fell under the scope of defendants’ liability. The ‘but for’ test also establishes that had the defendants acted with care, the plaintiff would have been able to continue normally. Furthermore, the ‘egg- shell skull’ is applicable, which states that the defendant must take the plaintiff as they found them. Defense: A defense of voluntary assumption of risk can be brought by defendants, which is an inherent risk , especially in recreational activates, consenting to injuries. However the League deemed the defendant’s actions unreasonable and they pleaded guilty to the charges, which weakens their…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The three main types of torts are negligence, strict liability, and intentional torts. In this paper we will discuss torts of negligence. When going to court for a negligence case the plaintiff must have all elements in order to prove that that defendant was negligent and liable for the injuries sustained. In negligence cases that outcome of the case depends on whether the defendant owes a duty…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If James fell and fractured his ankle, he would meet all the criteria in order to sue for negligence. However, if he only sustained minor injury, he cannot sue since he did not incur sufficient substantial damage (Yates, 143). This can be proven by examining the case of O.E.X Electromagnetic Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand (Yates 144). Assault. Assault occurs when someone is fearful that they will be physically struck (Yates, 100).…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    • Why do you think a society would address liability for civil wrongs separately from criminal wrongs? First, it is very necessary to understand what “civil wrong and criminal wrong” is, so we can have a better climate to discuss what is at stake. Civil wrong is “An action with a tort, an act against another person or their property, and, a breach of the terms of a contract”. (The law dictionary). On the other hand, a criminal wrong is the breaking of rules or laws for which some governing authority can ultimately prescribe a conviction.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is this case an intentional tort theory? Is it negligence? Is it strict liability?” 53: Students should note and think through the __________________ before evaluating the possible answers to a question -Theory 54: In a negligence, case there will always be a question of _______________. -Duty 55: Please answer completely and in accordance with your handbook. What are the key differences between civil law and criminal law CIVIL LAW Party who brings suit: Person who suffered…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contexualism In Nursing

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As mentioned before, I as the nurse need to protect the patient’s rights in confidentiality but speak with the physician to understand why the information was not given accurately to the patient’s family. The framework contexualism, is an important factor by analyzing the situation and find the best approach for it (Hood, 2013, p.68). I will then choose and act. I would first inform the patient’s family that the physician would be best to answer these questions to prevent scrutiny of the physician or the nurse of not giving accurate information and questioning the care the patient is receiving. I would then speak with the physician, and inform him to clarify the information or explain why the information was not delivered appropriately if it was due to confidentiality of the patient’s diagnosis.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Special Damages Specifically plead, unique damages, that must be foreseeable and reasonable. Susie was bleeding profusely and may have incurred injuries that need treatment in the future as well as lost wages from medical needs. Therefore, Susie is entitled to Special damages. SUSIE V. ALEXIS Negligence To prove negligence, the defendant must owe a duty to the plaintiff, that duty must be breached, and the defendant’s actions or inactions were the cause of the plaintiff’s injury. Duty Duty is the legal obligation required of an individual to act as a reasonable prudent person under similar circumstances.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Tests For Negligence

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A similarity is that they both award backward looking damages since they are both in the tort of negligence. Another similarity is that they are both fact causation tests which mean they use facts to prove their point. (Ferrtani, 2016). Now we are going to be moving on to the…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plaintiff suffers an injury on account of his breach. In cases of medical negligence, it is the doctor who is regarded as the defendant. Medicinal Negligence is itself a hypothesis of liability that inflicts claims of medical malpractice, making this sort of prosecution an elite part of the Tort in addition to Criminal Law and Consumer Protection Act. Civil Liability and Medical Negligence Negligence is associated with carelessness in a matter in which law seeks to mandate carefulness. A breach of a duty by a medical practitioner gives a patient the right to initiate action against him under medical negligence.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays