Electronic Benefit Transfer Argumentative Essay

How would people act if drug testing becomes a requirement in order to receive Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT)? Would they be furious with the process? Is it fair to the children of the parents that fail the drug test and would not be liable to these benefits? What does EBT do for people? EBT is a special kind of benefit that people receive from the government so they can get help purchasing groceries at the store. This benefit is also known as food stamps, and it is preferably established to those people that are disabled, cannot work, and are extremely poor. Though some people might disagree with being tested for drugs to receive benefits, they should be tested to ensure that no one is abusing the system so they can stay home, not work, and use their benefits for drugs. …show more content…
“Partially fifteen states have succeeded the enactment about drug testing or screening for universal assistance applicants or recipients. The states that have passed this are Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin” (“Drug Testing for Welfare”). Wisconsin comprised a plan a couple years ago in their financial bill to drug test random humans that engage in SNAP. “The federal government has indicated this goes against federal law prohibiting states…recipients” (Drug Testing for Welfare”). Wisconsin has filed a claim against the federal government pursuing certainty on the federal law. This article is basically explaining that they are against the idea of drug testing people with the food stamp benefits. Also it destroyed a law and now they have to fight a claim at the court to get things