Electoral College Should Be Abolished

Improved Essays
The Electoral College should be abolished is the topic of this debate. The Electoral College was created in September, 1787 after many arguments of how the president should be elected. Now with the Electoral College every four years, the states choose presidential electors (the same amount of their representatives for Congress). So if a candidate running for president received lots of votes from electors then he wins. Electing the president is not based on the citizen’s votes. Are votes as the people are just to give the electors an idea of what the citizens of that state want. Then they don’t have to pay attention to those votes. This topic is controversial because it is proposing equality vs. order. George C. Edwards III thinks we should …show more content…
Edwards III is representing the pro side of this argument. One of his major arguments was that the Electoral College should pay attention and protect state’s interest. Citizens have interest also of who should be president. Presidents are supposed to pay attention to citizens not the states. Citizens make up the state, so if you do not have citizens you would not have states. Then if we were to get rid of the Electoral College; then the candidates would pay attention to other states more than they do now. They are more worried about the winner take all system that they ignore the state they already know their vote for them. Which disenfranchises voter who supported the losing candidates. This system favors some citizens over others, which denies some people their choice of president. There is no proper distribution of the vote. Lots of presidents, like President Bush, lost the majority vote but won the electoral vote. As Edwards states, “…’proper distribution’…This claim is nonsense.” Direct voting would increase turnout. Because the citizens would know their vote would actually count for …show more content…
Gregg II definitely lost this debate. His argument of we should keep the Electoral College because it works, was horrible! That like parents telling their kids when they are having an argument, “because I say so”. Sorry to say that argument is weak and it is saying that you do not have any valid reason of keeping this system. His other argument of that if you change the Electoral College there would be hidden consequences. Yeah it is true, there could be, but we will not know in less we try it. Those hidden consequence could actually benefit us. The argument it forces candidates to interact with the citizens is a lie. They only interact with the citizens of the states they are trying to win over. Because they already know the votes of the other states. Then the argument of it helps with recounts and litigation. Lots of citizens can not vote, so that decrease the number of people voting and you only have to do a recount if the election is close. But if a candidate winning the majority of the votes there would be no reason to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    All the effort that they went to in order to make sure that the president would not be elected based off of just popular votes would have gone to waste. They would probably fear that uneducated voters would be a large portion of the voter turnout. This may end up resulting in a president who may not have the best qualifications to serve as a leader for the…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since results are based on the number of electoral votes and not the number of popular votes, presidential candidates can still win the election even if the nation voted for the other candidate. If the popular votes counted instead of the electoral ones, the candidate we wanted would win, not the one that won because he had the votes of larger states. Problems with representation are also caused by the differing number of votes that states receive because of population. Noble said that there is one electoral vote in California for every 705,454 people. While in Wyoming, there’s one electoral vote for every 194,717 people.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although I do agree with some opinions against the system when they state that it is not an equal manner in which to represent every individual vote in this country. The winner-take-all aspect that most states use prevents diversity and the recognition of the minority of that state. This is a major issue since most states are fastened to one party. On the other hand, I do agree with how the Electoral College prevents the voting of presidents by people who do not really know much about the candidates they are voting for. Sometimes people vote with their emotions, or even sometimes buy into propaganda.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A candidate can win the popular vote but still not win the election, because that candidate has more votes from the Electoral College. Some believe that the larger states have too much power. When you have too many electoral votes, the voice of the individual decreases, therefore, leaving little influence in the presidential election. This amount of power makes the voting unequal. Another criticism is the Winner Takes All process.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sources from Procon.org said, “If the election depended solely on the popular vote, then candidates could limit campaigning to heavily-populated areas or specific regions (Procon.org).” The candidates would not have to do as much campaigning because they would only be focused on the battleground states. Even though if the U.S only had the popular vote, all states would become battleground states because there would be no pledged delegates to put the final state vote in. The election process needs to be changed, there are several fixes that could be implemented into Congress to fix the electoral system in the United States. The Electoral College takes the power away from the citizens that they should have in a modern democracy, like voting directly for presidential candidates most importantly. According to Jerry Fresia, "None of our rights have been handed down; they have all been won through resistance.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would you feel if your vote in deciding the next president of our country didn’t matter? Well, this is true for many people due to our broken Electoral College system of voting. I strongly feel that we should get rid of it for many reasons. My first reason is that it doesn’t give equal representation to certain states. My second reason is that it doesn’t match up with the popular votes that were taken by the people.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College does not provide a straightforward process to elect president. As specified in Document D, “It favors some citizens over others depending solely upon the state which voters cast their votes for president…” In view of the fact that a state has less people than another does not necessitate that, they should obtain extra electoral votes. It should be fair and just let the votes be based off the number of senators and representatives. With political equality, all citizens are equal and it allows citizens to participate in state affairs. It includes the right to vote and the right to challenge elections.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While experts complain about this, those labels of the safe states and swing states reflect how people of those states will vote. Another benefit of the electoral college is that candidates must win state by state and this prevents their ability to go to their strongholds and increase turnout-or stuff their ballot boxes. The College makes candidates go to the most evenly divided states of our country to campaign to those voters. In doing this, it has made political parties less extreme and more inclusive than they would be without the Electoral College (US News by Trent England |Contributor Nov 5, 2012). An opposing view by some voters is with the college, small states and swing states will have more power.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s a waste of time. With a popular election, yes they would go to the battleground states but it would force them to reach more of the American people for them to dominate a state to receive as many votes as they can from that state, and more people would come out and vote from a state. Having only the candidate go to a few states does not really get people to go out and vote for them. If someone wants to become the president of the United States, then they represent all of Americans. If the candidate only go to the few states that they call battleground states, then it seems the other states are irrelevant.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 2000 presidential election, most people were prepared to accept that Al Gore would be the next president even though he would likely lose the popular vote. However, the opposite happened. George Bush won the presidency through a small margin of electoral votes, but had lost the popular vote of the people. This election is an example of how the Electoral College diminishes the importance of the votes of the people. Most people know of the electoral college, they have read about it in their U.S. Government textbooks or have heard it mentioned in a political news broadcast, but some people are unclear on how much power the electoral college possesses; it is the electors who have the power to elect the President of the United States, not…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays