Electoral College Debate Analysis

Improved Essays
The question regarding what actually is the best way of promoting democracy through means of voting has evoked centuries of debates. In the AP Government debate on the Electoral College, the affirmative side calls for a reform in this area and implies the advantage of direct democracy over representative democracy because it better preserves individual political power, and that the Electoral College the US has nowadays can pose a threat to minority rights. The negative side, on the other hand, defends the merit of representative democracy and stresses that it is actually more reliable and much more practical, therefore should be kept unchanged. Regardless of the process of the debate, their positions can potentially make significant influence in American government and politics. With democracy as a strongly upheld value, the American government has strived for individual rights and political powers for its people. Since voting is the more direct way of influencing policies, the way that the Electoral College functions is crucial for the nation, and is a major unique portion of Federalism. During the debate on this crucial issue, the affirmative team did an overall better job; they …show more content…
Their opening statement used statistics for the world series to resemble the process of Electoral College, and this could have been done in a much more efficient and accurate way by using datas directly related to their topic. For their closing statement, they brought up some information and datas that could have been used to strongly support their position; however, they not only missed the chance, but used it in a inappropriate section as well. The affirmative team also made the same mistake, but not as significant. Their use of language and tone showed a lack of confidence and made their arguments sound less persuasive than they actually

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If the government improve what society feels it lacks then perhaps Americans will change their views of government with gaining knowledge of politics’ belief like the meaning of equality, everyone able to access it. Americans are raised to be proud of their country…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the democracy being run by the people it is every citizen's responsibility to elect their representatives. According to text 2 Gratschew states “Advocates of compulsory voting argue that decisions made by democratically elected governments are more legitimate when higher proportions of the population participate” (lines 10-11) Due to the higher proportions of the populations participating in voting it will result in a more fair electoral system,in addition with having all Citizens vote the chances of the electoral college overruling the american citizens are slim downed significantly. For that reason American Citizens should be required to vote so that we can have equitable and justified…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution, states are guaranteed representation in the presidential election. This is important and ethical, just another tier of the separation of powers, an important government principle. If the popular vote replaced the electoral college as the means of electing the president, more power would go to the people and less to the state; balance, which is important, would be compromised. For all these reasons, it is clear to me that the electoral college must be preserved. The electoral college makes the most sense ethically, emotionally, and logically, as demonstrated through the points I have presented.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With respect to the advantages of binding referendum, evidence shows that should people have the opportunities to involve in public decision; it will significantly enhance the democratic feature of government. Likewise, since there is a chance for citizens to engage in public activities as well as contribute their influence on society, as a consequence, people will be better educated about the political issues and be able to make a reasonable judgement. Though, according to Professor Gallagher (2009, cited in the Stationery Office Limited, 2009, p.17) binding referendum can negatively damage the minority group since the result is greatly affected by elite groups. Moreover, the abuse of binding referendum can incline the political system to a conservative tendency should the conflict of interest cannot be resolved. More extremely, as the result can only be determined through the votes of citizens, binding referendum tends to be too costly while its benefit is insignificant.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Dahl On Democracy

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Those accustomed to free and fair elections continue the tradition. As well, the institutions that are founded to insure rights, for example the constitution, as deified in the minds of those participating. The symbol of democracy in a polyarchy is weighted more heavily than the reality of if these institutions are sufficiently…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States often looked to as the paragon of excellence when it comes to democracy, and on the surface it would almost seems to be, having free elections and the ability for seemingly anyone to run for and win office. Americans need to address the problems of campaign finance, and put reforms in place to truly give everyone that wonderful opportunity to run for and win office. Not just someone who is backed by wealthy donors and wildly prosperous Super PACs. They need to recognize the power that political advertisements hold, especially the negative ones in order to remain or become more informed on the issues. Lastly, Americans need to work just as hard as they would at enacting proper campaign finance reform, at being able to discern and distinguish biased media outlets.…

    • 2108 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Populism And Democracy

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This positive is that populism, produces collective solidarity. This solidarity is against the elites and the political class. Ernesto Laulau writes how populism is a key component to democracy and it helps not hinders a well-functioning democracy. He says in his book ‘On populism reason’, “the affirmation of the rights of the common people as against the privileged interest groups, usually considered inimical to the people and the nation” . This means giving power to the common people rather than power being limited to the elites, a key function of a well-functioning democracy because it brings people together as well as more people taking part therefore more public participation.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Campaign finance reformers would most like to see a cap placed on how much can be spent “independent” of campaigns just as there is a cap with how much can be contributed directly to a campaign. Unfortunately, Citizens United quashed any notion of spending caps because as previously stated the Court feels caps would inhibit free speech. Caps would help equalize the influence between the wealthy and the non-wealthy, and discourage bribery and extortion. Also, contribution limits would improve public political efficacy in the election process by reducing the presence of corruption, the appearance of corruption, and the appearance of inequality. Many Americans adhere to the idea that politicians and the political process are corrupt.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As Ilya Ehrenburg said, freedom of speech is something wonderful to have in this life. It is something that a U.S citizen has a right to have. The Electoral College in a way is taking our freedom of speech by deciding who the United States president by just looking at the Electoral Colleges elector votes. As Jeff Jarvis once said, “The idea of speech should be controlled to limit itself offensive to the principles of free, open, and modern society.” (Jarvis). What he means by this is freedom of speech should limit them mostly by our society which includes who we decide to lead us as a country.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being willing to sacrifice more ultimately benefits everyone. Daniel Shays deserves credit for creating the Constitution because he fought for reforming government to have the capital and authority to do more for disenfranchised Americans. Shays’ Rebellion exacerbated the need for national unity and strength. The rationale against crediting Daniel Shays is that it would be similar to crediting King George III for writing the…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays