Progressive Tax Policy Analysis

Good Essays
Is there the same burden for people on minimum wage, big cooperation and the upper class when paying taxes? According to Wikipedia “Progressive tax is a tax in which the tax rate increases as the taxable income amount increases.” It was a contentious issue for individuals as it is based on how they define equality. “Progressive tax was introduced and implemented in 1978 in Britain by Prime Minister William Pitt. It was now used in some countries to ensure that every one gets social benefits and opportunities.”

The social problem and the economic problem could be solved by higher taxation with the structure of tax code during 1950s, this could result in higher revenue for the government followed
…show more content…
This could eliminate the cutting of benefits on retired people just to pay its debt. Paying off massive debts have a huge improvement on economic growth. (Johnson, 2014)
President Bill Clinton and the Democratic-controlled Congress politically implemented the policy of raising the top marginal rate to 39.6 percent in order to get deficit under control.
The Clinton tax policy of higher taxation have prevented the federal budget from getting deficit. (Parry, 2011). This just reduced the share of budget that pays interest. The extra revenue enabled the government to improve on infrastructure, investment on energy efficiently, social benefits and keep the economic wheels spinning. Thus resulting in prosperity for the citizen and significantly improving the GDP, Growth Domestic Product. It reduced the political instability from the concentration of wealth. (Johnson, 2014)

According to Africa News Service (2013) Countries like Kenya generated revenues by forming a high top taxation. The revenue was then financially subsidies to small and medium enterprises which enabled them to easily enter the market and reduced unemployment rate. This policy has enabled to create million jobs lifting at least millions of Kenyans from poverty and expand social protection. Increasing top tax rates would result in more efforts for the entrepreneur who wanted to make a
…show more content…
President Obama’s and Chairman Rangel’s high taxation policies have made cooperation and upper class expenditures raised by paying significant percentage rates of their income. This leads to damage in economic growth due to low incentives in investing. It discouraged business investors to enter the market, effecting the long term economic growth. This reduced employment, submerging the employment rates. In some cases, Tax hikes did not improved budget balance as high earners primarily paid most of federal income tax burden. Tax hikes have a negative impact on economic activity of small business, driving them out of the market. Lacking of small business have plunge millions of job creation, draining the economic growth and have huge impact on struggling people such as minimum wage workers to lose their jobs. (Dubay,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The presidents thought process was the economic growth from cutting business taxes would expand the jobs in the workplace environment growing to expand the tax base enough to replace any initial loss from tax cuts overall replacing government revenue from the taxes initially cut. President Reagan attempted to tame inflation by shifting it from a fiscal policy to monetary. Other reductions seen within the government under Reagan 's control were spending and regulations on things such as oil, gas, cable, and overseas shipping. (Kiernan, 2004) Although, initially his policy helped inflation the rates that were put into place it begin to put a hardship on economic growth. For approximately 10 months…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, raising the tax rate when it is already high actually reduces tax revenue, reducing the amount of money that could benefit the people as a whole and thus the economy. The article, however, explains that this relationship between tax revenue and tax size is not applicable in reality, since there are many loopholes, such as tax evasion, that can cause revenues for wealthier individuals to rise when…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, the fiscal policy unfortunately increases the deficit budget that makes inflation goes high, which eventually makes the people lose their jobs and caused them into recession. Afterwards, the Federalists used this particular example to conclude that the government shouldn’t interfere with helping the economy. They also included the fact the government shouldn’t be in charge of regulating the economy, where they might corrupt the reserve system. In the conclusion, the fiscal and monetary policy can either run the economy which they may help prevent inflation or recession. Keywords: federalists, monetary and fiscal policy Deficit Budget The economy should be regulated by the fiscal policy while the government use its powers to cut taxes and spend money to control the interest rates.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, with the tax cut, they are now achieving their sought after return on capital, no longer being required to invest in new growth opportunities. Secondly, tax cuts historically raise the national deficit unless funded through other cuts. This can affect future investment as the costs of capital may increase. Recently, a major tax reform bill passed through the United States Senate. This bill proposed large tax cuts for corporations while many senators pushed the idea of “trick-down” economics and how the economy would benefit greatly from such cuts.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These 'newly created jobs did not pay well '. Due to deregulation, businesses could set their own wages for people, which sometimes resulted in wages being lower than the minimum wage set before deregulation. Even though unemployment decreased, those people in part-time jobs ended up with less money than they should have earned because of the government cutting welfare. The increase in welfare and government help for the poor resulted in a large influx of newly homeless people in America. This was a severe danger to the US economy as it meant people had less confidence in it and it also meant the government needed to spend more of its money on helping the number homeless people that continued to increase in…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1: What is Trickle-down economics Trickle- down economics is the idea that the money that the “Super Rich” spend circulates and promotes growth in the economy and benefits others. It is the theory that the drivers of economic growth are people that are successful in the economy and that from the tax cuts they receive they will spend more of their money in the economy and invest in business’s which will supposedly generate more jobs. Yet if this is in fact true then why is it that the living conditions are still bad and jobs are at an all-time low. It is promoting inequality and creating a bigger divide between the working class citizen and the super-rich. According to research done by (YouTube video) Britain is the only economy that has grown…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I couldn’t agree more with his statement, as it seems like everyone is intimidated to raise taxes on the wealthy, or makes up excuses why we cannot do so. According to writer Dana Golden 2009, “the more wealth the rich accumulate, the more they will spend it, thereby stimulating the economy” (qtd. in King 614). Golden’s claim that the more wealth the rich have, the more they will spend it, rests upon the questionable assumption that they…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The government borrows money for various reasons like programs, projects, bailouts of companies, and more. As the government borrows more money, this increases the national debt. Furthermore, a high national debt is bad for the country and citizens. As the debt rises, the interest rate will rise too. Thus, a con of the national debt is the private sector will have no interest in borrowing money with a higher interest rate, and citizens may have to pay higher taxes to compensate for the high national debt.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Death Tax Debate

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I agree that tax rates on capital gains and dividends should be decreased. Having a high capital gains tax earns the government money but have bad effects on the economy. High capital gains taxes make investing more expensive causing fewer overall…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capitalist Economy

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Government policy affects the economy in a variety of ways, but it is ultimately better for the government to have an active role in regulating and controlling it. Statistically speaking, the economy does better the more government regulation of it there is. Under the Obama administration, the economy has now more than quadrupled the number of jobs present from the Bush administration, and unemployment rates have dropped below the current historical average (Brooks). In addition, corporate profits have nearly tripled, and wages have increased 1.7% (Brooks). Under President Bush’s Administration, (which actively opposed government involvement in economic affairs,) unemployment peaked at 8%, the GDP lost 5%, and wages for college graduates stagnated.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays