Nuclear Renaissance: The Start of a New Era Year by year our natural resources shortage continues to expand by cause of people lifestyles that are increasing the demand of higher amounts of energy as a result of energy dependent devices, these include cars and appliances that require large amounts of electricity therefore, experts think that nuclear energy is an acceptable alternative considering that is economically satisfactory and necessary to replace fossil fuels yet after the nuclear disasters witnessed in Fukushima and Chernobyl general public is dismayed if the benefits are greater than the risks considering that, the authority has been investigating if its viable to be a society supported by nuclear energy finding greater gain than disadvantages. The downside that citizens list of nuclear energy was
…show more content…
The Russians sale of uranium to the world comes with an offer to take back the ‘nuclear waste’ and reprocess it into more fuel. (Tucker 1466). This way nuclear energy will produce a positive impact on the environment as a result of the zero emissions of greenhouse gases, this is why environmentalist groups have changed their mind. Holman W. Jenkins, member of The Wall Street Journal Board, notes that Environmental groups, with their perhaps unmerited moral authority have insisted for years, that curbing carbons is the greatest human challenge…have quietly recognized that the only alternative to fossil energy is nuclear. (1463). Risks are not genuinely real on the other hand benefits account is long and real just as the lower operational costs. Tucker comments that “a coal plant must be fed by a 100-car freight train arriving every 30 hours” (1466) but this is not the only fact that produces a low-cost operational cost in addition to the abundance of the uranium benefits the expenses. Just forty-five uranium mines supply the world 's nuclear fuel (Tucker
The Russians sale of uranium to the world comes with an offer to take back the ‘nuclear waste’ and reprocess it into more fuel. (Tucker 1466). This way nuclear energy will produce a positive impact on the environment as a result of the zero emissions of greenhouse gases, this is why environmentalist groups have changed their mind. Holman W. Jenkins, member of The Wall Street Journal Board, notes that Environmental groups, with their perhaps unmerited moral authority have insisted for years, that curbing carbons is the greatest human challenge…have quietly recognized that the only alternative to fossil energy is nuclear. (1463). Risks are not genuinely real on the other hand benefits account is long and real just as the lower operational costs. Tucker comments that “a coal plant must be fed by a 100-car freight train arriving every 30 hours” (1466) but this is not the only fact that produces a low-cost operational cost in addition to the abundance of the uranium benefits the expenses. Just forty-five uranium mines supply the world 's nuclear fuel (Tucker