Moral relativism is the philosophical view that basic ethical standards, morality, and positions of what is right or wrong are simply based on culture; therefore, these positions are subject to a person 's individual choices. It also states that no standpoint can be proved objectively superior to any other. In other words, we can all decide what is right for ourselves because there is no foundational or universal set of morals to follow. Moral relativism states that if something is true to someone, than it is true and cannot be disputed by anybody; all people are freely able to choose what is “right” in accordance with their beliefs. These beliefs are solely based on their own thinking which has been shaped by his or her culture and upbringing.
…show more content…
First of all, it is clear that having no absolute truths in this world would lead to chaos and confusion among the masses. If people all had their own ideas of what is considered right, it would be impossible to even have a simple conversation with someone since all people’s truths are different. Secondly, it is a counterintuitive idea. Moral relativism strives to put all morals on the same level, but that is impossible. If someone is truly a relativist, does he or she actually believe that a morally wrong action such as rape or murder is okay? Lastly, it makes all values completely meaningless. Moral values such as honesty, kindness, generosity, and justice and the moral value of human life become ultimately meaningless through the eyes of a moral relativist. How can kindness and selfless love be better than cruelty if no actual, external moral standard or truths exist? I believe that there are no true moral relativists in our world, but it is clear that at times, people hold this philosophy. It is important to know why moral relativism is wrong because it is becoming increasingly common and accepted in our world. If one is not aware of moral relativism and its evils, it may come across as the best way to be loving and tolerant of others when it is, in fact, just the
First of all, it is clear that having no absolute truths in this world would lead to chaos and confusion among the masses. If people all had their own ideas of what is considered right, it would be impossible to even have a simple conversation with someone since all people’s truths are different. Secondly, it is a counterintuitive idea. Moral relativism strives to put all morals on the same level, but that is impossible. If someone is truly a relativist, does he or she actually believe that a morally wrong action such as rape or murder is okay? Lastly, it makes all values completely meaningless. Moral values such as honesty, kindness, generosity, and justice and the moral value of human life become ultimately meaningless through the eyes of a moral relativist. How can kindness and selfless love be better than cruelty if no actual, external moral standard or truths exist? I believe that there are no true moral relativists in our world, but it is clear that at times, people hold this philosophy. It is important to know why moral relativism is wrong because it is becoming increasingly common and accepted in our world. If one is not aware of moral relativism and its evils, it may come across as the best way to be loving and tolerant of others when it is, in fact, just the