Effects Of Genetic Modification

Better Essays
Genetic modification is the elimination of a certain gene containing undesirable trait and adding another gene containing the desired trait. The process includes getting the desirable material from a donor and not from the parents. Parents now can get all the characteristics they desire in their babies. They can also eliminate certain health problems the child might inherit from his/her parents. Genetic modification and manipulation has become a controversial topic since it has ethical and religious concerns. Some people support genetic modification because they believe it could promote to healthier babies. But others are against it because it is considered as “playing God”. Genetic modification should not be implemented because of its medical …show more content…
“Safety concerns will prevent germline engineering from coming to pass; the risk of creating deformed babies is too great” Stolberg. S. (2000). Lewis in “There are really good reasons why we should — and shouldn't — genetically engineer human embryos”, explains about a Chinese experiment on gene modification. The result was that gene modification could be done on human embryos however it can cause “off target” and unintended effects on certain parts of the genome causing fatal genetic complications. Lewis’s article is important because it illustrates the effects of genetic modification on the embryo’s health. Genetic engineering can cause deletions and alterations to the DNA, affecting negatively it’s natural functioning and what is produced. Also, genetic modification consists of removing undesired genes from the embryo. It is a one-way change. The changes made to the genes cannot be unchanged, and thus these changes will be inherited by the future generations. Marcy Darnovsky (2014) claims in Genetically Modified Babies that genetic modification is dangerous. This method alters every cell in the children’s bodies regardless of their function where these changes might transfer to the future. In addition, designer baby is not a free error process. Numerous mistakes might happen in the laboratory causing accidental miscarriage. If accidents occur during the modification of certain genes in babies, problems …show more content…
Such disabilities include Being deaf, blind or dumb can prevent these people from living a normal life just like anyone else. However, some people with certain chronic illnesses were able to achieve something in life. For example, Jennifer Aniston is a famous American actress who had dyslexia was able to become a famous actress. Also, genetic modification is costly and only wealthy people are able to modify the genes of their babies. This would affect the social values of the society regarding accepting disabled people. It will also affect the equality in the society between normal and disabled people. For example, disabled people will face a lot of problems in getting a job in the society, especially that there are disabled people who were able to reach high

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Imagine this; a world where no one has lifelong infections or medical conditions. This might be made possible soon; however, some are afraid that parents will take it too far. With enough money, they could transform their babies to be intelligent and good looking. In my opinion, genetic engineering should be allowed, but restrictions should be in place to stop parents from making super babies. Genetic engineering is the purposeful changing of an organism's DNA.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others. These scientists are making the clones suffer through unneeded complications. Head states in the article, “Should human cloning be banned?”, “Scientists generally agree that it would be irresponsible to clone a human being until cloning has been perfected, given that the cloned human would probably face serious, and ultimately terminal, health issues.” It is impetuous for scientists to continue cloning because the babies that were made are alive and have their own feelings. They should not be forced to live with health issues their entire life because of our imperfect experiments. Scientists only want to create clones in order to have better organ donors.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Another barrier for genetic screening is that, genetic screening and "designer babies" would lead to requiring experimentation on women as well as on children. Many people argue that genetic screening can help treat diseases for future generations. It is unacceptable to use genetic screening to produce genetically healthy, or even “designer" babies. Moral and ethical barriers exist when beginning to change a humans genes. Many have feared the…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although this research has much potential, the adverse effects outweigh the positive gains. It may be beneficial because it can enhance and cure, but it is also unethical and ultimately causing problems within society. Mothers and fathers would be deciding a child’s genes, including interests, appearance, and talents. Which school a child goes to and which hobbies they take part in can be choices that a parent makes, which in turn hopefully makes the child’s life better. The parents making decisions for their unborn fetus robs them of molding their own identity because their physical traits have been chosen for them indirectly.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gene Therapy Cons

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The downside is that germ-line therapy could have overwhelming and unintended effects on not only the embryo but future generations. Once a mistake is made in germ-line therapy, it is permanent and has the potential to be passed on to future offspring. It is also an expensive treatment which will not be available to most couples. Much like Glannon, Walters and Palmer argue that germ-line therapy has the potential to lead to genetic enhancement which would not be beneficial for society as a whole. It could also then allow few individuals, such as scientists and doctors, power and control over future generations and the evolving human race.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gene Editing Ethics

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although CRISPER/CAS 9 is often precise, it has been known to cut the wrong strand of DNA leading to a whole new problem. The main subject of debate is whether or not to allow germ-line gene editing. Germ line editing is altering the genome in the sperm or egg cell. This provides the ability to change the genetics that a child is born with and these change s traits that would be inherited further down the generations. In altering the inherited traits we may be causing more problems in future generations while correcting the current ones.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay On Gene Editing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is wrong for parents and scientists to play God, except in the instance it could save the child from suffering. Now that scientists have successfully modified human embryos, the debates is on if human germline editing, changing the genetic code of future descendants, is an ethical thing to do. People say it is unnatural, but so are antibiotics and modern medicine. Another argument against gene editing is that it is changing the next generation without their consent, which is an awful argument because they cannot consent if they do not exist. The more time…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If this was to occur, it means the good cells would be damaged and cancerous changes may happen. On the other hand strength of this approach explained by The scientists who are exploring genetic engineering may have good intentions however, according to Kanapton (2015) it can still lead to an ethical disasters as it enables parents to design their own babies. On the other hand, Skladman (2011) stresses that genetic engineering can assist saving a person from a deadly…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because lives are saved, families are given hope, and a non-curable disease is possibly cured, stem cell research and transplantations are moral practices. For certain groups of American citizens, stem cell research is not a moral or safe practice because it gives “godly” powers to humans, foreshadows the eventual human clones and uses cells from innocent human babies. The counterargument is not valid because it expresses the fear and has no valid point. Additionally, the point that stem cells are using previously destroyed tissue cells to benefit another is being overlooks. Stem cell transplantation and research has the potential of growing in a valuable medical practice that can diminish human suffering and prolong human life as a…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Designer Babies Analysis

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is within human nature to strive for perfection. To be the best we can be, and now humans are on the brink of discovering how to finally reach this “perfection” we desire through genetically modifying fetuses or in other words creating a designer baby. However, should we really turn to designer babies in our search for perfection? In my opinion I do not believe we should because there are so many unforeseen consequences of designer babies that we cannot comprehend. We may come across bacteria that were originally harmless but due to the genetic engineering it became pathogenic to humans.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays