Effects Of Filibuster

Superior Essays
Show More
A filibuster is defined as a prologues speech given by senators to delay the chamber’s business. Therefore, it something that impairs policy making from occurring. This tactic is used normally when a senator wants to have a bill or nomination be ignored so it won’t be voted on. They do this by taking all of the available time for the bill by talking or making a prolonged speech. Which means that the filibuster is believed to impair the political process. A lot of people believe it should end while others do not see the harm. This controversial topic has even been the topic of various movies including the 1939 movie, Mr. Smith goes to Washington. Which makes people think, with such a great exposure, is it really that bad? One argument that …show more content…
This is not happening now because when senators are voted into office they are sent to make changes and the filibuster does not allow the changes to happen. The filibuster prevents the senators from doing what the voters want and makes people believe that the government does not care about its citizens. All of this occurs because the filibuster does not allow a bill to be voted on and therefore is damaging our democratic society. By eliminating the filibuster the government would be more responsive to voters. This would occur because then the government would be able to pass more policies in which the voters would be interested. These examples show why the filibuster does not work and should be eliminated …show more content…
The filibuster ignored the democratic value of rule of law. This occurs because the filibuster impairs policy making which leads the government to be less responsive towards their voters and citizens. Due to this, the voters do not care about the political competition. This happens because the voters elect a representative to make changes that will benefit them, but if a filibuster occurs, the bill can get killed and no change would be made. This makes the voters angry with the political system and can lead them to stop caring about the political process. The filibuster also brings less accountability to the voters. This takes place because representatives are not doing what their voters want them to do, as stated in the previous few sentences. All of this leads to no responsiveness from the government which interferes with all of the five democratic values. With this in mind, political science can help understand the filibuster with respect to the democratic values. This happens because they can show how people react and their views depending on what side of the argument they stand. After seeing all of the points given, depending on the side of the argument, I believe that the filibuster is doing harm in the political process. The filibuster harms the political process because the majority parties take advantage of it. The filibuster alone can be a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of How Democratic Is The American Constitution By Robert Dahl
    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary Of How Democratic Is The American Constitution By Robert Dahl

    The Electoral College is another undemocratic aspect of the American constitution that Dahl opposes. It is a system of voting that is unique to the American constitution, other democracies in the world do not have such a system. The Electoral College has simply sanctioned the popular vote. However, when the race is close, the Electoral College may end up selecting the candidate who did not receive the popular vote—which occurred in the recent 2016 Presidential race. Dahl argues the electoral college distorts equal representation . Two solutions Dahl offers that could make the Electoral College more democratic are: one, a constitutional amendment that abolishes the Electoral College, in which direct election takes place; two, a run-off between the top two candidates if neither win the majority . I agree with Dahls argument; the United States should purse one of these practical solutions. Given the circumstances surrounding constitutional amendments, it is difficult to abolish the Electoral College. However, this is not to say it is impossible—voicing awareness on the need to reconsider the Electoral College system is…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Interest Groups
    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Interest Groups

    The government can make this noble act into existence if they take certain measures such as; decreasing the amount interest groups puts into campaign finance, forcing them to be transparent during all times no matter if the spend a lot or not so much on campaign finance and also where the money goes. Only through this measures can our voices be equal to that of the strong lobbyist and interest groups who have superior connections and…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On The First Amendment Of The Constitution
    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On The First Amendment Of The Constitution

    Though it holds a great deal of power, it upholds strong personal values, and sets a precedent for the future of our country. The only problem…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    William Hudson Challenges To American Democracy Analysis
    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Hudson Challenges To American Democracy Analysis

    Per Hudson, the solution to this problem is to have a political alternative. The parliamentary system is a combination of the executive and legislative branches with the prime minister as the leader of the majority party. With this option, Hudson lists a few items he considers to be relevant to a parliamentary system, such as a greater accountability of the candidates and the officials by their respective political parties, as compared to American politicians. An example Hudson cites occurred in 1990 when the Conservative Party asked Margaret Thatcher to resign because they feared her leadership would result in defeat for the party. While this, indeed, is a change usually not seen in America, some of the parliamentary system features will not fit our country. For example, the vote of no confidence element in a parliamentary system could be a disaster. It will be…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis
    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    The first way that the framers sought to build safeguards against faction into the constitution is through the prevention of majority. This idea of tyranny of the majority is distinct from the fear of a mob uprising in that tyranny of the majority occurs through politically legitimate channels.2 Essentially, if the political system is not set up to limit majorities, those with similar ideas and interests can form groups that overwhelm minority interest groups.1 Therefore, tyranny of the majority truly reflects a concern in how the high minded ideal of representation can also undermine…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Difference Between Electoral College And National Popular Vote
    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Difference Between Electoral College And National Popular Vote

    Their amendment, had it been approved, would have reverted our nations election process to what it was originally. Celler and Bayh proposed that the president be elected by majority vote and the runner up would be vice president. Congress passed this proposal however, it was filibustered in the senate and died. (Koza, 128). In 2001, Professor Robert Bennett, claimed the state could allocate their electoral votes based on national popular vote, eliminating the need for a constitutional amendment. (Koza, 281).…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Triple E Senate
    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Triple E Senate

    Through the analysis of different factors describing why the Senate is not representative and how that effects the entirety of the nation, this leads to the discussion of Senate reform and representative alternatives to improve the red chamber.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dysfunction Of Congress Essay
    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dysfunction Of Congress Essay

    The design of two houses making up Congress allows the wants of the people to never be settled, because neither side can reach an agreement. The founding fathers’ intentions for Congress to be a government in which the people are represented and heard clearly failed due to the never-ending cycle of The Washington Establishment, the most prominent evidence of a broken government. No government is perfect; however, America should set an example to other countries as one with a government that truly represents its constituents, not as one with a broken…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing Senate In Canada Essay
    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Abolishing Senate In Canada Essay

    Canada is a great developed country without a long history, but its culture is rich and various, beautiful scenery, people live with happiness and content, perfect social welfare and so on. But there are still some problems exist in the country, one of them is about should the senate still working as a decision-making place or it should be abolished.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rand Paul's Filibuster On The Patriot Act
    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rand Paul's Filibuster On The Patriot Act

    The first time I had ever seen a filibuster was Rand Paul’s filibuster on the Patriot Act. A filibuster is when a member of the Senate uses prolonged speech to obstruct progress in a legislative assembly. During the filibuster of the Patriot Act earlier this year Rand Paul stood on the Senate floor for 12 hours or more and talked without eating, using the bathroom, or even sitting down. Now this is true passion for a topic. A lot of people though are against the filibuster because it halts a lot of progress on many different items, and some even blame the filibuster for the reason Congress is having some many issues at the moment.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Electoral College Argument Analysis
    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Electoral College Argument Analysis

    As a country founded on the ideals of freedom and liberty, the United States of America created a Constitution with democracy at its core. Although the Framers strenuously debated on how democratic the Constitution should be, the product of their efforts produced a document that has served as the basis for the democratic republic that America is today. However, some individuals, such as Robert Dahl, a political theorist and an author, illustrate the specific areas of the Constitution that have failed to promote its democratic quality. One of his most tenacious arguments lies with the dysfunctionality of the Electoral College, which he regards as a major contribution to the undemocratic character of the Constitution. He provides two distinctive…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Readjusted Disenfranchisement
    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Readjusted Disenfranchisement

    Disenfranchisement laws have proved to be problematic in America for a variety of reasons. One of the most striking issues, in my opinion, is the impact felon disenfranchisement has on minorities due to the racial disparity of prisons. Despite the laws being upheld at the federal level, it seems that it they are outdated and detrimental to American values. The laws also negatively affect political participation. “Although many Americans do not exercise their right to vote, the right itself is fundamental to citizenship” (Uggen and Manza, 195). Even if the right to vote was extended to felons and they did not exercise that right, it would at the very least give them a sense of citizenship and a voice. Rather, disenfranchisement acts as a continued punishment for felons who may have even completed their sentences and treats them like second-class citizens. The amount of disenfranchised felons is projected to increase, which has been a clear trend since the 1970s. It would be beneficial to try and adjust disenfranchisement laws now before it becomes even more…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Congressional Term Limits
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Congressional Term Limits

    Proponents argue that term limits, which restrict the number of terms a legislator can hold office, can result in greater diversity, can allow new ideas, and can reduce corruption within Congress. However, opponents argue that term limits bring inexperienced, and therefore incapable, individuals into Congress. They also argue that incumbents are more aware of their constituents’ needs and have the incentive to provide for them; therefore, term limits are not necessary. Although both sides make very good points, term limits are in fact necessary in Congress. This reform proposal could solve many problems within Congress by bringing in fresh ideas and…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Framers Of The Constitution Essay
    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Framers Of The Constitution Essay

    They implemented several anti-majority rules such as the electoral college system, a bicameral legislature and the judicial review process in order to safeguard minority rights and prevent “tyranny by the majority”. By creating the electoral college system, the founders ensured that the election of the president was not directly decided by majority vote but rather by well-informed representatives elected by the people This system would prevent the selection of the president based on the whims of people, allow less populous states to have a voice, and strengthen the concept of federalism, the sharing of powers between state and national government. The creation of a bicameral national legislature, a Congress composed of two separate chambers, the Senate and the House of Representatives, also eliminated future rule by the majority. In designing the republic, framers opted to have the House of Representatives elected directly by the people while senators would be elected solely by the state legislatures. While larger states desired representation based on population in order to have more power, smaller, less populous states wanted equal representation so that they would not be ruled by the majority. By establishing a bicameral legislature, the founding fathers ensured that the law making process was contemplative and not based on passionate public opinion, thereby preventing majority rule. The judicial review, the power of the Supreme Court to declare acts passed by Congress unconstitutional, also limited the power of the majority as it had the power to override the decision made by a majority in Congress as unconstitutional and prevent a bill from becoming a law. While the framers wished to observe the principle of the peoples’ will, they understood the downfalls of a direct democracy. By creating an Electoral College system, a bicameral legislature and the judicial review process, the…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Political Polarization
    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Political Polarization

    If they could be regulated the occurrence of stalemates would most likely be reduced and subsequently the effectiveness of Congress would rise. Effectiveness is expected of a government and when it isn’t delivered it can damage the government 's ability to function. “…political instability damaged the ability of Russia to build…” (Ruffley 192). Filibustering and gerrymandering only festers the problem of ineffectiveness. Regulating these two matters would more than likely help speed up our snail’s pace and balance the majority and minority parties in favor of the citizens’ opinion. It would also give the people a reason to trust Congress again and Congress could breath a sigh of relief that there will be less time spent arguing and more time spent getting things…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings