Effects Of Filibuster

Superior Essays
A filibuster is defined as a prologues speech given by senators to delay the chamber’s business. Therefore, it something that impairs policy making from occurring. This tactic is used normally when a senator wants to have a bill or nomination be ignored so it won’t be voted on. They do this by taking all of the available time for the bill by talking or making a prolonged speech. Which means that the filibuster is believed to impair the political process. A lot of people believe it should end while others do not see the harm. This controversial topic has even been the topic of various movies including the 1939 movie, Mr. Smith goes to Washington. Which makes people think, with such a great exposure, is it really that bad? One argument that …show more content…
This is not happening now because when senators are voted into office they are sent to make changes and the filibuster does not allow the changes to happen. The filibuster prevents the senators from doing what the voters want and makes people believe that the government does not care about its citizens. All of this occurs because the filibuster does not allow a bill to be voted on and therefore is damaging our democratic society. By eliminating the filibuster the government would be more responsive to voters. This would occur because then the government would be able to pass more policies in which the voters would be interested. These examples show why the filibuster does not work and should be eliminated …show more content…
The filibuster ignored the democratic value of rule of law. This occurs because the filibuster impairs policy making which leads the government to be less responsive towards their voters and citizens. Due to this, the voters do not care about the political competition. This happens because the voters elect a representative to make changes that will benefit them, but if a filibuster occurs, the bill can get killed and no change would be made. This makes the voters angry with the political system and can lead them to stop caring about the political process. The filibuster also brings less accountability to the voters. This takes place because representatives are not doing what their voters want them to do, as stated in the previous few sentences. All of this leads to no responsiveness from the government which interferes with all of the five democratic values. With this in mind, political science can help understand the filibuster with respect to the democratic values. This happens because they can show how people react and their views depending on what side of the argument they stand. After seeing all of the points given, depending on the side of the argument, I believe that the filibuster is doing harm in the political process. The filibuster harms the political process because the majority parties take advantage of it. The filibuster alone can be a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    They implemented several anti-majority rules such as the electoral college system, a bicameral legislature and the judicial review process in order to safeguard minority rights and prevent “tyranny by the majority”. By creating the electoral college system, the founders ensured that the election of the president was not directly decided by majority vote but rather by well-informed representatives elected by the people This system would prevent the selection of the president based on the whims of people, allow less populous states to have a voice, and strengthen the concept of federalism, the sharing of powers between state and national government. The creation of a bicameral national legislature, a Congress composed of two separate chambers, the Senate and the House of Representatives, also eliminated future rule by the majority. In designing the republic, framers opted to have the House of Representatives elected directly by the people while senators would be elected solely by the state legislatures.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment of the constitution is the right of free speech; throughout our history the first amendment has been interpreted in a number of ways. Despite this fact all Americans agree that this is one of our most important rights, and lays the foundation for our nations core beliefs. The first amendment is a short statement “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (1) Though it holds a great deal of power, it upholds strong personal values, and sets a precedent for the future of our country.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paper #3 – Critical Evaluation of Hudson’s Challenges to American Democracy In the textbook, American Democracy in Peril, William E. Hudson has written a well-thought out critique of the challenges faced by American democracy, but some of his methods and reasonings have issues. Hudson is looking for anything that he thinks might work in the American democracy. This paper will critically evaluate Hudson’s work and a few specific flaws in his proposals. Hudson is striving to make a difference, but he has not conscientiously considered the feasibility of his plans.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How California’s Government Differs from the Federal Government Each state has its own government that govern the people living in that particular state. The State’s government makes ballot initiatives etc. to help the maintain a democracy in the state. The Federal government, on the other hand, makes laws, treaties etc.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Vs. National Popular Vote The recent 2016 presidential election, has caused the population to question the electoral college, more than it ever has before. Those who disagree with the electoral college have propelled the National Popular Vote (NPV), a movement that started in 1969.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the analysis of different factors describing why the Senate is not representative and how that effects the entirety of the nation, this leads to the discussion of Senate reform and representative alternatives to improve the red chamber. A representative alternative that has been previously proposed was that of a Triple E Senate. A Triple E Senate would be comprised of elected senators versus the unrepresentative appointment of individuals by the Prime Minister (Makarenko, 2006). An elected Senate would benefit the entire nation as it would allow different regions and provinces to choose exactly who would best represent their interests, versus the Prime Minister practicing political patronage. The triple E Senate would also permit,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress: A Broken Government Throughout history, scholars, politicians, and the general public have been divided into two separate categories: those who agree that Congress is not a broken government and those who disagree with the former and argue that Congress is a broken government. While many factors point toward either argument, the most prominent answer is that Congress is, indeed, broken. The design of Congress, the founder’s intentions for Congress, and the Washington Establishment are among some of the many reasons that reveal plainly the brokenness of the government and allow others to see the dysfunction of Congress as well. Congress is designed to be made up of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first time I had ever seen a filibuster was Rand Paul’s filibuster on the Patriot Act. A filibuster is when a member of the Senate uses prolonged speech to obstruct progress in a legislative assembly. During the filibuster of the Patriot Act earlier this year Rand Paul stood on the Senate floor for 12 hours or more and talked without eating, using the bathroom, or even sitting down. Now this is true passion for a topic. A lot of people though are against the filibuster because it halts a lot of progress on many different items, and some even blame the filibuster for the reason Congress is having some many issues at the moment.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As a country founded on the ideals of freedom and liberty, the United States of America created a Constitution with democracy at its core. Although the Framers strenuously debated on how democratic the Constitution should be, the product of their efforts produced a document that has served as the basis for the democratic republic that America is today. However, some individuals, such as Robert Dahl, a political theorist and an author, illustrate the specific areas of the Constitution that have failed to promote its democratic quality. One of his most tenacious arguments lies with the dysfunctionality of the Electoral College, which he regards as a major contribution to the undemocratic character of the Constitution. He provides two distinctive…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that over time felon disenfranchisement has become unconstitutional and detrimental to American democratic beliefs. When the idea of disenfranchisement was implemented in ancient Greece and Rome, it served as a deterrent to criminal activity. However, now it is used as another form of punishment even after felons have completed their sentences. Disenfranchisement is also problematic because of the increasing racial disparities in prisons, which eliminates a large portion of African Americans from voting. Not many studies have been conducted on public attitudes towards felons rights and voting, however one was discussed in a paper written by David Wilson, a professor at the University of Delaware.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New perspectives in the legislative branch can guarantee that newly implemented laws align with our constantly changing society. Service limits will also complicate corrupt practices of some politicians, making it more difficult to build long-term relationships with lobbyists or private companies hoping to use wealth to pass legislation. Although a Constitutional amendment is needed to accomplish the task, the benefits of term limits for Congress make it worth serious consideration. References Burgat, C. (2018, January 18). Five Reasons to Oppose Congressional Term Limits.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let's now say, the executive branch felt that because of "C" it required a different method by which to enforce "C", "D2 "; but, "D2 " is a method that the Executive branch is employing that would deprive citizens of their freedom because they decided to say the word "Bang". The resultant effect of utilizing this method locks up hundreds of people because they take plea deals & after one hundred more a person(defendant) finally decides to go to trial. The defendant is found guilty, but, manages to preserve an objection over the methods utilized by the executive branch, thus, having the ability to appeal the ruling & subsequent incarceration(read denial of freedom & liberty, to say the least); the objection ought to be obvious, the executive branch's method effectively criminalizes speech, a violation of the first amendment, which…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Legislators voted for senators before the citizens did because it was believed that this would approve with the Constitution and relieve pressure off of the appointed officials from the people. Before this amendment was ratified, several concerns about the amendment coming into effect, because the founders who created this piece of legislation thought it might lead to more corruption in…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays