Effects Of Filibuster

1468 Words 6 Pages
A filibuster is defined as a prologues speech given by senators to delay the chamber’s business. Therefore, it something that impairs policy making from occurring. This tactic is used normally when a senator wants to have a bill or nomination be ignored so it won’t be voted on. They do this by taking all of the available time for the bill by talking or making a prolonged speech. Which means that the filibuster is believed to impair the political process. A lot of people believe it should end while others do not see the harm. This controversial topic has even been the topic of various movies including the 1939 movie, Mr. Smith goes to Washington. Which makes people think, with such a great exposure, is it really that bad? One argument that …show more content…
This is not happening now because when senators are voted into office they are sent to make changes and the filibuster does not allow the changes to happen. The filibuster prevents the senators from doing what the voters want and makes people believe that the government does not care about its citizens. All of this occurs because the filibuster does not allow a bill to be voted on and therefore is damaging our democratic society. By eliminating the filibuster the government would be more responsive to voters. This would occur because then the government would be able to pass more policies in which the voters would be interested. These examples show why the filibuster does not work and should be eliminated …show more content…
The filibuster ignored the democratic value of rule of law. This occurs because the filibuster impairs policy making which leads the government to be less responsive towards their voters and citizens. Due to this, the voters do not care about the political competition. This happens because the voters elect a representative to make changes that will benefit them, but if a filibuster occurs, the bill can get killed and no change would be made. This makes the voters angry with the political system and can lead them to stop caring about the political process. The filibuster also brings less accountability to the voters. This takes place because representatives are not doing what their voters want them to do, as stated in the previous few sentences. All of this leads to no responsiveness from the government which interferes with all of the five democratic values. With this in mind, political science can help understand the filibuster with respect to the democratic values. This happens because they can show how people react and their views depending on what side of the argument they stand. After seeing all of the points given, depending on the side of the argument, I believe that the filibuster is doing harm in the political process. The filibuster harms the political process because the majority parties take advantage of it. The filibuster alone can be a

Related Documents