Gun Control Effectiveness

Great Essays
This paper will talk about Gun control primarily in the United States of America. It will cover how gun control affects the safety of average day citizens. How ineffective Gun control can be in the United States. This paper will also compare other countries with the United States on how effective their gun control laws are. The history of gun control in the United States of America. Murder statistics of firearms and other weapons. It will also bring up cases that are similar to gun control and how they were enforced and how they worked out in the end. The last thing it will cover is if gun control impedes on the rights of an American citizen.
Introduction
Gun control will not make it harder for criminals to obtain firearms. But with the heighted
…show more content…
But the failure of gun control would not be the only instance when the federal government failed to prohibit or regulate certain items. In The 1920’s the federal government passed the Volstead Act, which prohibited the sale and the consumption of alcohol. The Volstead Act was enforced strictly in most states, and it was hard to come by Alcohol by common means. This helped create a monopoly on the illegal selling of alcohol for gangs and the mafia. More and more people started to buy alcohol illegally. This is also believed to what help modern day organized crime to come about. The Volstead Act was eventually repealed in the 1930’s. The similarities between the Volstead Act and gun control is this. The Federal government couldn’t stop people from obtaining alcohol no matter what they did. Which also means if there was a weapons ban they couldn’t stop people from buying weapons. It also showed that despites all of the laws made their still is people who are willing to do whatever possible in order to obtain what they want. If the Federal government started to make more strict gun control laws. Then there will most defiantly be an increase in criminally bought weapons. Another law that can also be used to support why gun control won’t work and is not very effective is, the ban on illegal substances such as marijuana. Marijuana is completely illegal for use unless it is for medicinal purposes in most …show more content…
Why is the Gun Control in the area that have the strictest laws on gun control not working? The answer is obvious it only prevent legal sales of firearms, it can’t stop illegal sales. Although gun control can stop some petty criminals from getting their hands on a gun. It can’t stop a determined one from getting it illegally from an illegal dun dealer. By definition a criminal is someone who does not abide by the laws. So will harder gun laws actually stop someone from getting a firearm? The answer is no it will not stop them from getting a firearm. You can look at the prohibition and the ban on illegal substances. Laws don’t stop criminals from getting illegal things from illegal dealers. It can only stop someone from getting a firearm to protect themselves from the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Lott argues that more gun control would do absolutely nothing, and be very ineffective. Lott says that criminals oftentimes procure their weapons illegally, and tightening gun restrictions would not do enough to completely stop illegal firearm trafficking. Therefore, gun violence would not be lowered. Lott compares this idea to illegal drug trafficking. Even though many narcotics, including marijuana, heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamines, are illegal in the United States, there is a high availability of each of these illegal substances.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminals are labeled as criminals because they do not obey laws, so making laws to limit the ownership and usage of guns would not help prevent gun-related crimes. The laws would only limit the rights of law-abiding citizens. Perfectly stated by Jeffery Miron, “Thus the classic slogan - when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns - isn’t only a word play, it is a fundamental insight into the folly of gun prohibition. Such an approach means that the bad guys are well-armed while the law-abiding citizens are not” (“Rebutting”). Miron mentioned the foolishness of gun prohibition, which one could relate to the failure of alcohol prohibition.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It states that gun control is helpless to avoid kids to use guns. After that, gun control is not a guarantee of reducing deaths. To implement gun control, it means governments restrict the sales, purchases, owning and carrying guns. It is not only ineffective in reducing death rates, but that increases with high speed. Similarly, criminals do not care laws as they illegally do many other things.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If they have a clean record, then they simply purchase the weapon from a local gun store, or sporting goods store. Convicted felons and other criminals cannot even be near weapons or touch the weapon. This makes it difficult for them the acquire weapons, so they resort to theft or black market sales. This is imperative since it shows how criminals can obtain guns and maneuver around and avoid laws. They would rather buy a gun off the black market because more than likely the serial number will not be present on the weapon.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Also that gun control needs to be put in place in order to keep guns out of the wrong hands. The people on this argument are wrong because, first off they need to know that guns aren't evil. Guns aren't evil because they cannot think, speak, or reason, guns are an inanimate object, guns are mainly just a piece of plastic and metal, and is not capable of evil acts upon human beings alone, therefore guns are not evil, the people use guns the way that is illegal are evil. Another reason these arguments are wrong is because criminals can get guns with ease even if gun control was in effect, they already do get guns illegally anyways, what’s going to stop them with gun control in place? Because of this gun control arms the criminals who have no regard for the law and disarms the law abiding citizens who follow the law, when the other side says to get guns out of the “wrong hands”, they already have guns in their own, lastly according to an article about gun control states: “In a perfect world, gun control would mean going house to house throughout the nation and taking away every single firearm, including muzzle loaders.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Brady Campaign’s article, “Gun Control Laws: Should the United States Adopt Stronger Gun Control Laws?”, explains why it is a bad idea to limit the amount of guns being sold. If criminals want to get guns, they will. This is no secret to the general public that when something is illegal, typically that does not mean that there are no ways of getting it. Examples of this include alcohol during the prohibition, drugs, and even gambling. There are a variety of different ways that a criminal can become in possession of a gun even if it is illegal.…

    • 2050 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens. This victimization of the defenseless is even prevalent if the criminal does not have a gun. The government of the United Kingdom banned handguns, and over the following years, not only did murder go up, but more people were being killed by knives and strangulation…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns are not the problem, people are. Gun laws will only prevent law abiding citizens from getting guns to protect themselves from both legally and illegally armed criminals. People often misunderstand the purpose of the Second Amendment. Many anti gun argue that the Second Amendment is out dated…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control In Mexico

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Though gun control is a necessary thing, many are against stricter gun control laws. Those opposed to stricter gun control laws would state that gun control would have no effect on reducing crime (Gottieb 1991). However, according to the Huffington Post, which states that with “Higher gun violence tend to have much less stringent gun laws” (States 2013). Having gun laws that put severe restrictions on guns are unhelpful and impractical. The government can make it almost impossible to obtain a…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays