Direct Effect Case Study

Great Essays
Direct effect is a principle enabling individuals to rely on European provisions before a national or European court. This principle was broadened and defined over time through cases brought before, and rulings of, the European Court of Justice. To understand how direct effect evolved and to what extent it protects individual rights, we must look at those cases and rulings in a chronological matter. I will firstly examine direct effect’s scope of application over time, and then turn my attention to how the extension of its scope of application affected the protection of individual rights.

The doctrine of direct effect was born in 1963 in the case known as Van Gend En Loos.
The case was brought before the European court of justice by a postal
…show more content…
The basic principle governing the concerned area would have direct effect if it was sufficiently certain, even if there was a lack of measures at a Community or national level. Before 1974, direct effect was restricted to treaty articles and regulations but Van Duyn v Home Office changed this in allowing directives to have vertical effect. It was judged that since directives had a binding effect, they had to have direct effect; or as the court put it: “[i]t would be incompatible with the binding effect attributed to a directive by article 189 to exclude, in principle, the possibility that the obligation which it imposes may be invoked by those concerned.” European law would not be effectively enjoyed and applied if individuals were not able to invoke their rights before the national …show more content…
This right to bring action before a national court has been broadened in Defrenne v Sabena when it was ruled that individuals can rely on horizontal effect, that is to say they can enforce their rights against individuals. This enables individual rights to be protected in a fuller manner as this new category makes the cases in which direct effect can be applied much more numerous. Therefore, the situations where rights can be defended have augmented. This is also true to say for Van Duyn as giving direct effect to directives includes even more rights to be protected. Measures of EU law create obligations on member states to ensure that rights are conferred upon individuals in the way they should be and by being able to enforce this rights, individuals are guaranteed of their protection. Nonetheless, the evolution of the principle did not only widen its scope; from time to time, it has also restrained it. By giving a time lapse on the direct effect of directives, the European court of justice conferred less power on individuals to protect their rights. As a directive has to be implemented by the member state, one has to wait until the time given to the member state for the implementation has expired; this seems to be only a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The supreme legal authority in the United Kingdom is in the hands of the parliament. In the traditional view of parliament is…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuanced Consent Theory

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order for a state to derive its just powers from the consent of the governed, all individuals within the state must be able to give their consent, willingly and autonomously, knowing that to do so, is to incur certain political obligations to said state. They must also understand that in doing so, they also authorise certain actions of the state towards them. In the case of consenting to the UK state, these obligations are mostly in the form of an agreement to obey the law, and the acceptance of any sanctions/punishments the state may consider fit. This essay will argue that the UK cannot derive its just powers from the consent of the governed, as there is no way for the governed to truly give their consent to be obligated to the state.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sublimation of the assault weapons that were given out could cause both crime and tax would increase and new laws will be enforced. Noticing that assault rifles are not even required to use while hunting, the government already gives out shotguns and pistols. It’s not the gun, but the person who pulls the trigger, but some people want to give that irresponsible individual a weapon of mass destruction. The creation of an assault rifle caused the flow of war to change, think of what it could cause the U.S to turn into.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Starkey’s lecture on the 1215 Magna Carta started my interest for law. The Laws of the Magna Carta very much affected the people of 1215 whether that be the barons or the monarch himself, and the same can be said in today’s society, that the law affects everyone. Henceforth, my chosen area of which I would like to study is law. In a world of change, I believe that is important for laws to be changed and for new laws to be introduced so that they reflect the concerns and ideas of the current civilisation. Personally, I conscientiously keep up to date with current issues and affairs because I think it is imperative to know about this and how it affects not only you but everyone else.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Double Effect Case Study

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In regards to the Anna Pou case, I think that I would have made a similar decision with the information that Dr. Pou had at the time. In our textbook, it states that the remaining staff after Hurricane Katrina believed that “no further evacuation or help was coming to them (Pence 56).” Therefore, the staff decided to euthanize the remaining nine patients to avoid any unnecessary pain and suffering. Prior to making this decision, I would have contacted the administrators of Memorial Hospital and the parent organization of the hospital (LifeCare) in order to find a way to accommodate these patients without euthanasia. The lack of communication between the parent organization and the hospital staff seemed to be a defining factor with this case…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arising from this, Conservatives also criticise section 2 of the HRA as per “to take into account” Strasbourg interpretations . This requirement along with the proportionality principle that the ECtHR employs, allows Strasbourg judges to bound UK courts in a way that serves the sole interest of the Council and not the country. Adding to their criticism, Conservatives also mention section 3 of the HRA, which allows domestic courts to derogate from statutes by interpreting provisions as widely as alienation with the Convention requires. One believes it undermines Westminster sovereignty, as per the example of Regina v Loosely, where their Lordship went insincere extent in applying the relevant provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 on the case in order to serve the interpretations of the ECtHR and successfully acknowledge the Article 6 Convention right of the applicant. In accordance with the opinion of…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Deference

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction This paper is based on varied literature including journal articles, research papers, online resources, edited books, etc. The main focus of this paper is to examine the UK courts procedure in relation to the concept of deference with regards section 3 and section 4 of the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998, it’s limitations and the essence of judicial deference to legislation and the interference of Parliamentary supremacy. In addition, it would be potent to highlight ‘the judicial approach to the scheme of the HRA particularly the interpretation and application of the interpretive obligation laid down in s 3 and the power to declare legislation incompatible under s4 as well as the construction by the judiciary of a principle of deference’…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin with, in the judicial system, there is an ongoing dispute over what compromises the proper amount of judicial power. The lack of agreement concerning policymaking power of courts is reflected in the debate over judicial activism versus judicial restraint. In general, these two theories represent the conflicting approaches taken by judges in their task of interpretation. Thus, the Court may choose to play an active or passive role in politics by either changing or upholding public policy.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The European Courts are in focus again this week, as the EU Commission attempted to challenge Britain’s insistence that only those with a “right of residence” in the UK can claim social security benefits. The right to residence test says an EU citizen can only live in Britain for more than 3 months if they are in work, are self-employed,or have sufficient financial resources and health insurance to ensure they are not a burden on the welfare system. This decision means that some EU migrants with dependent children are denied access to child benefit and child tax credits.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Judiciary is the section of government which is tasked with interpreting laws passed by parliament. In the USA the constitution established the Supreme Court under article 3 of the constitution. It is the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation and its decisions can only be overturned by a constitutional amendment. In the UK, a supreme court was established in 2009 to provide greater clarity in the UK’s constitutional arrangements. In the UK, under the concept of Parliamentary Sovereignty, it is parliament which makes the laws but it is the courts who are tasked with interpreting them.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Broad Rationes Case Study

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay will conclude that broad ratios further reflect social attitudes and prevent certain minority groups being excluded from the law, and therefore society. I) The flexibility of broad ratios With broad ratios the rule can be extended to include other aspects, such as that in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson, in which Lord Buckmaster states “If such a duty exists, it seems to me it must cover the construction of every article… If one step, why not fifty?” This flexibility encourages growth within the law.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are here any limits on the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty? In answering this question, I will first set out a traditional definition of Parliamentary sovereignty. I will then consider two different senses in which it might be said that there are limits on Parliament’s sovereignty.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As a consequence, we have a duty to obey the law but it can be overridden when we have a more pressing moral obligation . Furthermore, to reinforce my point of view I will rely on what Finnis advocated concerning that matter. He was also conscious that saying an unjust law is not a law is a contradiction, when he talked about the peripheral sense of law. Indeed, he explained that law has two senses. On the one hand, law has a focal meaning, “it describes rules which secure the common good by co-ordinating the different goods of individuals” .…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This report will put forth Dworkin’s case and evaluate his premises by discussing important arguments that exist both in favour and against them, in terms of theoretical soundness and practical feasibility. To begin with, Dworkin distinguishes between “weak discretion” and “strong discretion”, specifying the latter to be the topic of contention. By “strong discretion”, he refers to judges exercising judicial discretion…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays