Edward Westermarck

Decent Essays
The Sources and Grounds of Morality (Edward Westermarck)
In this essay, Edward Westermarck claims that morality is the emotional constitution or structure, our society and custom are not important to teach anything about morality. My view of point that morality is not only emotional constitution, it is depends on our cultural, society and religion. Different cultures and religion have numerous rule and fashion. In my reading “Relativisms in Ethics” by William H. Shaw said “Morality is just like fashion in clothes, beauty in persons, and legality in action- all of which are relative to, and determined by, the standards of a particular culture”. William H. Shaw explained that morality based on persons culture, society and whatever person thinks

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    One particular debate that has bedeviled humanity since its inception is the question of the nature of human morality. We as humans argue about the source of morality: most religious fundamentalists argue that morality comes from a deity, whereas secularists tend to argue that morality comes from within and is subjective. We also argue about its objectivity, and many will attest that their moral code is a paragon above all others. Morality is a code by which most sane humans live their lives; it would seem logical that such a dominant force in human interaction would foster such discourse. Amongst all the uncertainty in the nature of morality, however, there is but one certainty: morality is based entirely on perspective.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ruth Benedict first seeks to demonstrate that perceptions of morality vary between cultures. Only providing one or two examples would evidently be insufficient so we are deluged with many. She dwells on this point, but it is easy enough to grant. However, after wearing us down with these examples, she unexpectedly jumps directly to her conclusion of moral relativity. Unless I am perceiving it incorrectly—which is entirely possible—this is the gist of her argument: cultures have differing views on morality; therefore, morality is relative.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This demonstrates that cultures’ moral judgment is found at many times to be wrong allowing for moral progress and the acceptance that morality does have objectively true…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edward Irving Wortis

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages

    On December 23, 1937 in New York City, as you know him Avi was born. But, Avi was not his original given name, his real name is Edward Irving Wortis. The name Avi was a nickname his sister, Emily Leider when Avi was younger and the name stuck. The reason Avi did not put his real name is because his parents always discouraged him from becoming a writer so he did not want to put their names (last names) on any books. He first realized he wanted to become a writer when he was in his senior year in high school.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    James Rachels: 1: Moral relativism is the perspective that ethical benchmarks, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and in this way subject to a man's individual decision. We can all choose what is right for ourselves. Moral Relativists call attention to that humans are not omniscient, and history is loaded with samples of people and societies acting for the sake of a trustworthy truth later exhibited to be more than error prone, so we ought to be extremely careful about constructing vital ethical decisions in light of a gathered supreme case. Absolutes additionally have a tendency to hinder experimentation and abandon conceivable fields of request which may prompt advance in numerous fields, and smothering the human…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions on Three Narratives 1. What is the difference between naysaying ethics and yeasaying ethics? Explain. What does this have to do with the story of the people of LeChambon? Naysaying ethics “forbids our doing certain harmful things”, even if that means to close the eyes to the reality and don’t do what people know it’s a right decision.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They deem that our moral compass is in part due to the moral standards held by the culture we are a part of and those ethical standings are a direct reflection of the character and values of each person. There is a basis for what is right and wrong, and those who are in the wrong are determined by the society they live in. The emphasis of how the structure of the values and ethical standards surrounding a society can deeply influence the individual members of that culture and the way they develop their own…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mind Tyrant Analysis

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    THE MEANING OF ETHICS: 1. Describe mind tyrants and explain their significance to the study of ethics. Identify two original examples of mind tyrants. Mind tyrants are an individual’s thoughts and ideas that are influenced by customs, traditions, and social norms. These tyrants play a vital role in establishing what one might believe is right, wrong, good, or bad.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Edward Witten

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Edward Witten was born into a jewish family, to his parents Lorraine and Lois Witten. His father was a specialist in gravity and general relativity, while his brother was a television producer. In 1971, Witten went to Brandeis University and received his BA, then in 1974 went on to princeton and received his MA and then in 1976, received his PhD. Witten went to the university of Wisconsin in Madison but ended up dropping out after only a semester. Witten started to study history like subjects, but when going to Princeton he started to study mathematical subjects. After working on his first string theory revolution that had to deal with gravitational anomaly.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shaw’s essay about Relativism in Ethics he analyzes the matter of what is ethically wrong and right and how relative it is to an individual or to one’s own culture. He defends to argue that ethical relativism of either side is unjustified. Shaw examines that some relativist may think that morality is relative to only the individual and not one’s own culture. This theory considers that what is right and what is wrong is determined by what an individual may think is right or wrong. However, if any individual was to decide what is right and what is wrong how would one know what really is right and wrong.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All the moral issues presented in this book were not wrong because the culture determined they were right. While the actions brought by imperialistic ideology, racism, and the corruption of man may have been barbaric; they were justified by cultural relativism. The normative system of relativism clearly outlined a pattern, if morality is relative, then nothing can be…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Accessed 25 Sept. 2017. “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/cultural-relativism.htm Velasquez, Manuel, et al. “Ethical Relativism.” Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/ethical-relativism/. Accessed 25 Sept. 2017 ”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is” practiced”https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/ethical-relativism/ “Cultural Relativism.” AllAboutPhilosophy.org, www.allaboutphilosophy.org/cultural-relativism.htm.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Folkways, William Graham Sumner claimed that morality is actually just a reflection of the mores. He further argued that since morality came from the typical culture groups, it should be only bounded within the group but not universally. The thesis Sumner raised in his argument, aka, ethical relativism, had been challenged by many objections. In this essay, I will provide one objection of ethical relativism and argue that even Sumner attempted to address the objection; his thesis is still fallacious due to begging the question. One critical objection to ethical relativism is the absurd objection.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays