Black Humor In Apuleius The Golden Ass

Improved Essays
Apuleius’ The Golden Ass and Juvenal’s Satires 3 and 4 use black humour as a leeway to express the seriousness of the situation through humiliation and dramatization in order to keep the audience entertained. Humour, especially black humour, which often involves a taste for the macabre, is used to make light of something that is considered serious or taboo. In The Golden Ass, black humour is used to illustrate Lucius’ trial where he is made a ridicule of in front of Hypata’s citizens for the festival of laughter enabling the audience to sympathize with him. Lamachus the bandit’s hand getting cut off in The Golden Ass is ironically humorous due to his intentions of robbery. In Juvenal’s Satires 3 and 4, Umbricius uses dramatization to ridicule …show more content…
The trial takes place in a theater which seems to be typical of Greek orient as the accused has to persuade the people of their innocence (Summers 514). It imitates a real trial well enough to trick Lucius who is pleading his innocence in fear through tears, resulting in the townspeople being convulsed with laughter (Summers 513). The people of Hypata laugh at his predicament just as the guests at Byrrhena’s dinner party derived pleasure from Thelyphron’s misfortune (Frangoulidis 29). These misfortunes that are seemingly difficult for the main subject involved, allows the audience to gain pleasure from them. Apuleius leads the readers to the trial with a set of organized incidents that make the fear for Lucius very real as they sympathize with his situation (Summers 521). Once it is realized that it is not serious, the reader can de-stress, and be amused by Lucius’ misery, hence the black humour. The humiliation of Lucius acts as foreshadowing for the events that are to come when he is later transformed into an ass (Frangoulidis 29). The wineskins Lucius slays can also be representative of his transformation as he is put into the skin of something else, by having to be something he is …show more content…
Throughout Satire 3, Umbricius, who is leaving Rome due to its corrupted and chaotic nature, expresses his annoyances of city life, claiming he would prefer to live on the country side. When he is voicing his opinions about the nocturnal perils of Rome, he is dramatizing the scene by saying a person would be “most improvident, a catastrophe-happy fool” if they go out to dinner without having first made a will, when pottery thrown from above buildings could kill a person (Juvenal 272-273). He continues on to say everyone better “pray and hope that the local housewives drop nothing worse on [their] head[s] than a pailful of slops” (Juvenal 277). This is considered black humour because of the fact that a person could die from something as simple as a knock to the head from “falling tile” (Juvenal 269). Umbricius goes on to explain the troubles that can be caused by a bully who cannot rest his eyes without having a fight. He states that the bully tends to avoid the rich but goes after the poor, who can only “beg for his last few remaining teeth to be left” (Juvenal 300-301; Dunn 53). This illustrates black humour by showing that the bully only comes after the poor when they are the ones who are most helpless, yet the targets of unfair treatment. The reader is able to sympathize with the poor man as it can be related to real life as well. Since the complaints of Umbricius

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Remember that story from the bible about Adam and Eve and the evil snake? The basic overview of the story is when God first created the heavens and the earth, he also created the first humans, Adam and Eve. God gave them a set of rules to live by and one of the rules was to not eat the fruit of one specific tree because it was holy. Adam was laying under the tree one day and a snake slithers beside him. The snake is the devil in snake-form.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric, it’s all around us whether we realize it or not. In Act Three of Julius Caesar, Caesar moves to the capitol after refusing Artemidorus’ letter of warning. Shortly after, the conspirators (people who were planning to kill Caesar) stab him to death. Antony flees the scene but Brutus convinces everybody to let him live. Brutus then explains to the people of Rome the meaning of why they had killed Caesar, but what Brutus, the conspirators, and people of Rome don’t know, is that Antony is pretending to be an ally but in reality, plans on striking back with the help of Octavius Caesar.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tone is the literary term that defines the author's attitude of the situation conveyed through the characters. In Act III Scene I the predominant tone is one of mockery. The character Brutus conveys mockery through the use of Jokes about the death of Caesar. They call his death a benefit due to the fact that he no longer needs to fear death. They further mock him by covering themselves in his blood and declaring freedom, peace, and liberty.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loyalty is defined as a devotion to a person, country, group, or cause. Loyalties can conflict with each other and one would have to choose, but could that justify killing a person? In Shakespeare Julius Caesar, Brutus, Caesar’s best friend joined Cassius and other conspirators to kill Caesar justifying it by their loyalty to their country, Rome. They believed that Caesar is getting too powerful and his power is going to his head and will damage the republic. At Caesar’s funeral, both Brutus and Antony, Caesar’s noble friend give speeches that included different strategies to affect the audience’s feelings and thoughts.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analytical Comparison of The Comedy of Errors by William Shakespeare and The Parent Trap by Nancy Meyers How has comic concerns and comic techniques developed and changed over time? As society innovates, the humor associated with that society innovates as well. This exploration illustrates the extent on which narratives, comic techniques, characters, and thematic concerns have changed with the passage of time by comparing The Comedy of Errors by William Shakespeare (pre-20th century) and The Parent Trap directed by Nancy Meyers (post 20th century). In both examples, the entire plotline of the play is based on an extremely improbable and absurd set of circumstances heightening the opportunity for humor and detaching any conception of realism…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act four, scene two of Julius Caesar begins with an argument between Cassius and Brutus. This argument leads into scene three as well. Cassius is upset with Brutus for punishing Lucius by putting him in jail. Lucius had been taking bribes. Wealthy citizens of Rome would pay Lucius in return they would get a government position.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Satire in Monty Python’s Holy Grail In the movie Monty Python and the Holy Grail, a group of knights, led by King Arthur, go on a quest, given to them by God, to find the Holy Grail. After a little debate, they split up, going on their own way, but eventually find each other again, where they approached the Bridge of Death. Once getting past the guardian of the Bridge, King Arthur and Sir Bedevere the Wise find the Grail, just to have the police apprehend them. This movie is a significant, modern example of satire, which burlesques the knights and customs of the Middle Ages.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Sacrifice

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s usage of central ideas develops a suspenseful theme in the play. In the midst of turmoil between the tribunes and Caesar, Shakespeare made Caesar’s death a “sacrifice” rather than a “butchery”. The first three acts of the play portray the relationship between Caesar and those who conspire against him. Amongst the conspirators, Caesar is seen as a tyrant over the people of Rome.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Twelfth Night or What you will is a play written by William Shakespeare in about 1601-02. It is a comedy which focuses around the romantic relationships of the twins Viola and Sebastian and their love interests Orsino and Olivia on the island of Illyria. The play has a comedic twist by including an element of crossdressing, which in turn brings much confusion to the romantic relationships of the characters. The Twelfth Night was written during the renaissance, which was a time of excess; in both the arts, beauty and frivolity. Shakespeare explores these areas of excess in the first monologue of the play by the Duke and throughout the course of the play.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, questions have arisen about when it is right to kill someone or not. There are usually two sides to this controversy: it is never right to kill someone, or it is better to kill one person and save thousands of lives than to risk the death of thousands of people. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, it can be argued that Caesar truly did deserve to die for various reasons. In Julius Caesar, Caesar deserved his fate because he had many physical weaknesses that held him back, he was too power-hungry and egotistical, and he would have ultimately hurt Rome more than helped it.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Latin word “noble” is defined as “having, showing, or coming from personal qualities that people admire such as honesty, generosity, courage...etc”(Webster 's Dictionary). In the 1800’s the word, “noble” was used in many books, speeches and other works of writing. Over time, the adjective “noble” is being used less and less in literature. Noble is commonly used to describe someone with high morals and great character. In the last lines of the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the character Mark Antony concludes about Brutus, “This was the noblest Roman of them all” (V.v. 74-81).…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yara Mneimneh Mrs. Kate Bowler English 10 A 12 December 2015 Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Speech In Act III Scene II, Marc Antony presents his famous speech that begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”, this speech was able to change the minds of the audience to turn against the conspirators. The purpose of Antony's speech was to show tribute to his friend Caesar in a eulogy and to revolt the audience. Antony wanted the audience to revolt for him to seek revenge on Caesar’s brutal murder. The purpose contributed to the significance of the speech in the play.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Considering the importance of Shakespeare’s work, as with similarities to this world’s modern day politics, there are additional reasons as to why these plays are so memorable. As explained before, each character was created to have, and express, their own individual personality, much like real people. While time does its continuous cycle of moving forward, people may end up changing their views over certain issues. Within editor Will Gompertz’s article, Why is Shakespeare More Popular Than Ever, he comments that one of the main reasons the bard’s plays continue to alter and adapt and model all of the beliefs of an ever changing society is, “because they had so many different audiences to please when originally written - one afternoon Shakespeare…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays