1. How do you decide if you should accept something as knowledge?
2. What, according to you, are the minimum requirements for something to count as knowledge? By your action you will show that you accept something as knowledge. So using your skill based on the knowledge is acquired from experience. Therefore, using those skills will achieve results. Basically, knowledge means understanding with facts learned by personal experience, agreed, or study. Ultimately, the capacity to use knowledge and understanding successfully to resolve problems, escape or prevent risks, achieve positive goals, or advice others in doing so. (5 Sentence ) ( 5 sentences left to complete)
My minimum requirements are personal experience, observation, and agreed for …show more content…
4. Do you think that Edmund Gettier’s examples expose a problem for the justified-true-belief notion of knowledge? If so, can this problem(s) be overcome? If not, then explain why not?
I don't believe that Edmund Gettier’s examples expose a problem; instead it ascended as a challenge to our understanding of the nature of knowledge. Gettier’s cases are intended to challenge our understanding of propositional knowledge. His examples have a justified true belief which, naturally, fails to amount as knowledge. Gettier provided arbitrary counter-possibility lacking evidence. But in the situation of a man who doesn’t recognize the clock is stopped, he does have a justified true belief. Therefore, if he looks at the clock in 10 minutes or an hour and sees the time is still the same, and then he knows it is now justified in believing that then, when the clock said 3pm, it was definitely 3pm. Now he is convinced the clock has stopped. However, the entire key to the Gettier problem does appear to be the explanation of justification in all three solutions proposed, belief, truth and
2. What, according to you, are the minimum requirements for something to count as knowledge? By your action you will show that you accept something as knowledge. So using your skill based on the knowledge is acquired from experience. Therefore, using those skills will achieve results. Basically, knowledge means understanding with facts learned by personal experience, agreed, or study. Ultimately, the capacity to use knowledge and understanding successfully to resolve problems, escape or prevent risks, achieve positive goals, or advice others in doing so. (5 Sentence ) ( 5 sentences left to complete)
My minimum requirements are personal experience, observation, and agreed for …show more content…
4. Do you think that Edmund Gettier’s examples expose a problem for the justified-true-belief notion of knowledge? If so, can this problem(s) be overcome? If not, then explain why not?
I don't believe that Edmund Gettier’s examples expose a problem; instead it ascended as a challenge to our understanding of the nature of knowledge. Gettier’s cases are intended to challenge our understanding of propositional knowledge. His examples have a justified true belief which, naturally, fails to amount as knowledge. Gettier provided arbitrary counter-possibility lacking evidence. But in the situation of a man who doesn’t recognize the clock is stopped, he does have a justified true belief. Therefore, if he looks at the clock in 10 minutes or an hour and sees the time is still the same, and then he knows it is now justified in believing that then, when the clock said 3pm, it was definitely 3pm. Now he is convinced the clock has stopped. However, the entire key to the Gettier problem does appear to be the explanation of justification in all three solutions proposed, belief, truth and