Difference Between Economic Justice And Deontology

Improved Essays
Economic Justice is something that is crucial to the way society works today. Therefore it can be evaluated by deontology. This is because each citizen has a duty to economic justice, a right to earn money in order to provide, and consequences for not contributing or not providing. Deontology works best when evaluating economic justice because it focuses on the right and duties, as well as, the consequences.
Deontology pertains because economic justice is about citizen’s right to be involved in unlimited work beyond just the economic part. It allows each citizen to also work on the things that engage the mind and spirit. For instance, a construction worker may have a construction job, but also coach basketball and work as a church leader.
…show more content…
Citizens have a duty to participate in the economy to create input by working and paying taxes. This allows a citizen to have the right to contribute to one’s economy and one’s own stuff. However, this does not mean special treatment for anyone supposedly. Yet, famous rich people are more likely to get house arrest if they have done something wrong compared to the poor people who are more likely to be sent to prison for committing a crime. This seems like an advantage to the rich and disadvantage to the poor. As a consequence, our prisons are filled with the poor people. This is because money does give special treatment in our society. It allows for better things and more advantages than not having money. Therefore, someone who does not have money will work all their life and still have an unlikely fortune of moving up or being privileged. It is also a citizen’s right to distributive justice, commonly known as output. What this means is that each person gets what they give through hard work. It is the government’s duty to maintain social justice with our economic system, making sure that everything is fair. However, it is hard to do when the United State economy is in debt and cannot help the poor without taking from the …show more content…
However, there is heavy consequences of having the current economic system that we have. One of these consequence are the lack of Economic Justice for all citizens. Many people cannot find work or choose not to work, failing at their duty and contribution to our economic system. Others cannot improve their lives or do anything other than work to provide for their family. Many cannot even provide. Therefore, I recommend making our economic system more just and virtuous by creating places, free of charge, for homeless or lower class people to help them meet with advisors to help find them jobs. This would actually give people references to finding jobs and would help them feel more comfortable doing so with guidance. This would be a much more virtuous way of handling poverty and our economic justice. I also recommend establishing a minimum salary that every citizen has to at least make each year. This will help make sure that everyone is economically stable instead of having people without any money and people with all the money. This is much more virtuous because it protects the people from living on the streets. It is our duty to care and help others as much as we can. Therefore, creating an organization that will walk citizens through job processes and ensuring they can find a job, as well as, providing a minimum salary for everyone would help make our economy system more

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When the poor get arrested, they lack the resources to hire good lawyers to defend themselves Henslin (2014). Often, they cannot even post bail, and they remain…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ehnreich observes poverty is not only a condition of those unemployed; rather, people who are fully employed, with wages too low to even cover rent. Barbra illustrates America as a nation focused on benefitting the wealthy by keeping inflation low and stock prices high, but at whose expense? Low- wage jobs do not reflect American values, and America is generally indifferent towards those who work them. “You check your civil liberties at the door, leave America and all it supposedly stands for behind, and learn to zip your lips for the duration of your shift.” Social Justice is defined by the NASW as “the view that everyone deserves equal economic, political, and social rights and opportunities.”…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kelsee Kessel 12/1/16 “ The rich get richer and the Poor get prison. “ The book “ The rich get richer and the poor get prison “ by Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton is an attempt to give the reader a look into the criminal justice system that the media and American government doesn’t. It highlights the bias of criminal charges against the poor as opposed to the well off and claims that from even before the process of arrest, trial, and sentencing, the system is biased against the poor. Whether that be in what it choosen to be treated as crime, who is conviced , length of sentencing or ignoring the numerous criminal acts of the rich. It also claims that there isn’t enough compassion or attention for the reasons for crime in poverty stricken neighborhoods but rather these people are looked down upon.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Let America Be America Again” is a poem written by Langston Hughes in 1935. In the poem Hughes openly shares his thoughts on the American dream. The meaning of the poem is that the idea of the “American Dream” seems to be just that, a dream. Since the beginning, early Americans practiced slavery and oppression, they destroyed the land that belonged to the native people in order to build their own settlements. So this whole idea that America was founded by people with complete freedom in mind is nothing but a dream.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As citizens it is our jobs to evaluate every candidate’s proposals so that we can determine which candidate has the “right” or “good” solution to the nation’s problems. Some voters focus only on the consequences of these potential policies while others focus on the consequences and other factors that influence the duties, rights, and rules of the people. The three areas that can easily be discussed in terms of consequences or duties and rights include education, health care, and criminal justice potential policies. In order to find a “right” or “good” solution for both education and health care, I think it is best to focus on only the consequences of the proposals which is known as Consequentialism. However, potential criminal justice policy’s…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America is experiencing a large gap in income inequality between the working class and the wealthy class. According to Derek Thompson, the new wealthy class, which is the top 1% of America population, holds nearly 40% of America’s wealth; while the new working and social class holds significantly less than 7%. There are opinions thinking that this gap is caused by the rich, who only think about their profits and don’t even care that America is having job a shortage or people are working low wage for several years. On the other hand, some blame the working and social class for their “immobility”, saying that they are not trying hard enough to climb out of the bottom while depending too much on the government subsidizes. Both opinions are true…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Incarceration And Poverty

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the United States, the criminal justice system has become an industry that profits off of criminalizing the poor; a practice that perpetuates and worsens the cycle of poverty rather than promote justice as it is meant to do. With the highest Gini rate of inequality compared to all western countries and a record of income inequality last seen a year before The Great Depression, it is apparent that the United States is facing a critical problem with poverty. However, rather than fortify the economic safety net with higher taxes and increased spending to social welfare programs, the U.S. has turned to mass incarceration not only as a method of funding government programs, but also as a way to temporarily solve its severe problem with poverty.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Fieser, J. n.d) It would be kind and generous to pay employees higher than the minimum wage, therefore morally right. Approaching the ethical question of income equality from the consequentialist perspective, we can look to the theories of utilitarianism to provide support with “The greatest balance of goods over harms” and promoting the happiness of everyone concerned (Markkula Center For Applied Ethics 2014). Finally, while duty based ethics often conflicts in many areas with consequentialism, there are also theories here that support closing the gap on wealth disparity. One such example of this is Imanuel Kant’s categorical imperative that says “Treat people as an end, and never as a means to an end.”…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Environmental racism is obvious in practices that uncover racial minorities in the United States, and non-white individuals around the globe, to unbalanced shares of environmental hazards. In the article, Just Garbage, Peter Wenz explains his reasoning on the justness of current practices concerning issues of toxic waste is involved with racism. In my opinion, the disproportionate shares of environmental hazards are more associated with economics than racism due to the Doctrine of Double Effect. The Doctrine of Double Effect states “an effect whose production is usually blameworthy becomes blameless when it is incidental to, although predictably conjoined with, the production of another effect whose production is morally justified.” According…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years there has been a debate between the opposing philosophical frameworks consequentialism and deontology. Some could argue that consequentialisms maxim of "the ends justify the means” as the determinant for a moral action may be inconsistent with other important aspects of value such as rights and allegiance. Others may argue that deontology is simply too restrictive and independent of the context in which it could be applied to. Although these two philosophical frameworks have various pros and cons associated with them, I will argue that consequentialism is the most flexible of the two frameworks. Consequentialism portrays right action in terms of intrinsic value, stating that the “action is right if…its consequences would be…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Justice. It is at the heart and soul of the American ideology. We believe there is no such thing as a civil society without it. We fought a revolution to free ourselves from the laws of an unjust king.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is justice? The common good? Are they just words of idealistic thinking, or do they have a deeper meaning? The way of life is difficult and full of fright. One of the new ways to think of this problem is communitarianism.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays