Economic And Political Differences Between The Patricians And The Plebeian Class In Ancient Rome: An Analysis

Improved Essays
Ancient Rome was made up of various classes, which includes the patricians and the plebeian classes. Although these classes were not treated equally, there are some aspects where they were accorded the same privilege. For instance, the Patricians and the Plebeians had a citizenship right. However, the Patricians and the Plebeian class had different political and economic inclinations, which evidently led to the famous plebeian revolt within Rome. In this paper, we examine how the economic and political differences between the Patricians and the Plebeian classes ultimately led to the plebeian revolt. Finally, the paper discusses the result of the first revolt or secession.
Ancient Rome witness a class of the rich and the poor. According to cavazzi (2012), the Patricians were apparently the wealthy class of people who acquired enormous properties such as lands, houses, and other valuable belongings. The Patricians were the aristocrats and noblemen who control the government of ancient Rome. This classic position of the Patricians, even though they were a small number of wealthy Roman families, enables them to dominate, rule, and
…show more content…
The Plebeians were the working class citizens whose contributions to the Army ensure the survival of Rome during wars. While they were political and economically marginalized, they resolved to recuse themselves from the Roman army; therefore, deserting their generals and proposing to begin an independent city. This development brought the Patricians to the reconciliation table and enacted reforms that improved the living standard of the Plebeian people. The Plebeian revolt was, therefore, a huge success by all accounts because, for the first time, the Plebeians acquired a position in Rome, which they had never had prior to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Fall of the Republic was caused not only by one individual’s actions or one event but a culmination of several actions from different individuals and events. Unfortunately, some influenced massively in the Roman society. There Large and quick expansions from Rome’s foundation as an underdeveloped city; creating enormous holes in the governing and political ability in the Senate. While the powerful individuals of Roman mob like the general were jockeyed for position. The Roman life was facing differences far more rapidly than the governing body could manage.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just like China, the wealthy people were the only ones that were able to vote and become the higher power, but it was not because of the cost - it was because of how wealthy people were viewed. Rome was doing well with their newly created government, but as the months went on, the political system began to decay. There were too many classes within Rome’s “pyramid” and due to a high population, their economy was failing because of inflation. This backlash caused violence to become more common within Rome for these political…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rise Of Rome Dbq

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction After asserting its independence, Rome was led by dictators and consuls all from the aristroctrats. The revolt, after all, had been led by the nobles. Yet the commoners of Rome, the plebeians, were the larger part and demanded more equal and political rights. Inspired by Greek tales of democracy and made determined by the increasing hardships face by the ordinary commoner the plebeians demanded more equality.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Government Structure

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The author of this journal article is Fergus Millar who is noted to be one of the leading historians in the studies of the ancient worlds. In his multiple publications, he focused on the roman republic and empire and what made it different economically, socially and politically. The government structure was an institution that put an emphasis on the community’s involvement. In the book Ancient Rome, the author William Dunstan breaks down how the system was split into a variety of parts that collectively worked together to ensure that the republic of Rome functioned properly.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic is traditionally dated from 509 BC to 27 BC, becoming established with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom and was destroyed with the development of the Roman Empire. When considering the fall of the Roman Republic, it is clear that the reorganisation of the army, particularly through the actions of Marius, Sulla and Caesar, contributed greatly to the disempowerment of the Senate and therefore the Republic. Through the undoubtedly instrumental Marian reforms, the Roman social and militant structure was altered permanently, a design that was manipulated and built upon through the course of Sulla and Caesar’s political careers. Through all of this factors, it is unquestionable that the changing composition of the Roman Army…

    • 1791 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Rise Of Rome

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Livy lamented the republic’s early days, when morality seemed to play a more important role in the patricians’ careers, and wondered, “such decency of feeling, such fairness and magnanimity [that] characterized...the whole body of the Roman commons,” wondering “where would you find it today in a single man” (4.6)? The system was incredibly political; alliances formed, bargains made, blackmail mounted, and careers won and lost by seemingly subtle shifts in favor. This fickle and nebulous power structure threatened to collapse, as it later did with Julius Caesar, if the massive system of checks and balances within the flat government failed to prevent an overwhelming concentration of power in one position or person. To this effect, “some of the governing elite were concerned to prevent prominent and popular senators from overshadowing their peers by too wide a margin. Senators after all, especially the most prominent among them, were participants in a constant competition for fame and glory, and certain very ambitious individuals within this circle may occasionally have desired to achieve an unduly preeminent place in the city.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Rome DBQ

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Imagine, you are safe in a controlled city, you are healthy and enjoying a nice bath, or eating a feast in the dining hall. This is what it was like for most Romans from about 50 BCE until the year of 200 CE. At this time, Rome was the superpower of the Mediterranean World and Rome’s territory, wealth and popularity were well known (Background Essay). Although Rome was prospering, it was slowly starting to fall apart due to poor leadership, a weak military and invasion of outsiders. Poor leadership was a big contributing factor to the fall of the Roman Empire.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Destiny Feggins HIS-111 Quality of Life in Ancient Rome Within these two articles, “Pleasures and Excess in the Roman Empire” by Paul Veyne and “Slums, Sanitation, and Mortality in the Roman World” by Alexis Scobie, we learn about the history of how the Roman society worked as well as gain insight through the theories created in what could have possibly been going on in the everyday life of Roman citizens. We get to delve in the social scales of the people including how/ where they lived and what they were capable of achieving while building up their empire. Historian Paul Veyne tells us a bit about the way society worked out within the Roman Empire and how the people were greatly appreciative of their social hierarchy, enjoyed the finer things…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gracchi Brothers Rebellion

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the unique features of public service in the Roman Republic was the delicate balance between refining Rome and gratifying the aristocracy that overpopulated every legislative body. Those courageous enough to defy typical conventions and the hierarchy of Roman politics encountered delightfully diverse methods of death. The most notable examples of Roman politicians who died in infamy were Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, tribunes who encouraged populist land reforms and repeatedly flouted the limits of their power. While their reforms were necessary, the Gracchi brothers’ rebellion further engendered an authoritarian relationship between the controlling Senate and Consuls, thereby portraying them as selfish enemies of the state, and weakened…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 3rd century B.C.E. Rome, a republic and the dominant state on the Italian peninsula, emerged as a new Mediterranean power. When Rome became a city-state, the people were mostly farmers. The early Romans spoke Latin. They borrowed elements of culture from Sicily and the Italian coast. The ideas contributed included planning, gold and bronze, gods and goddesses, and arch building technology.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The development of early Rome was fundamental to the rise and fall of the political and economic developments of the late Roman Republic. In 753, we begin to see the…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout history, there has been several examples of shifts within the political and economic structures of early era societies. Such shifts are viewed in the Babylonian society under Hammurabi, the Athenian society under Solon as their lawgiver, and, lastly, in the Roman society with the plebeians. The Code of Hammurabi, Solon’s reforms, and the Twelve Tables shared several similarities as well as differences when addressing the issues of class divisions and social hierarchy. Each of them implemented a social stratification alongside several other distinctive standards on their individual societies to create a peaceful balance. In fact, the elements of socioeconomic status are the prime factors that created this social hierarchy.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Economy Essay

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bernie Sanders once said, “A nation will not survive morally or economically when so few have so much, while so many have so little.” This statement accurately represents the Roman economy. Rome started out as a small city-state, but developed into a large empire because of its economy. The wealthy population of Rome nearly controlled the economy, while the poor lived difficult lives. Though much of the power rested with the rich, the growth in the economy was accomplished by the work done by slaves and civilians.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With the defeat of a vast majority of the newly obtained city-states Rome became rich in culture, money and goods, however these spoils were not shared amongst the masses, and they were kept to be spread amongst the few rich aristocrats, who ran the government of Rome. They were what I’d refer to as the one percent. Although this may have been advantageous to the people in power it was demoralizing to the common people of Rome who were often forgotten and left to fend for themselves, with the little that they…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Previously, Rome despised one ruler and fought wars during the expulsion the kings, seemed to have returned Rome to their old habit after conquering and expanding their territories. As Rome expanded, so was their ego, discarding the incorporation policy and making it’s conquered territories as its subjects rather than granting them citizenship of Rome. Through conquest, Rome’s politicians became greedy for power and stole from Rome’s citizens, who were entitled to a piece of public land, where families could have a better standard of living by farming their land property. Consequently, the rich were getting richer, while the poor were getting nothing.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays