Economic, Economic And Economic Growth Of The Roman Empire

Superior Essays
The extensive growth of the Roman Empire from 218BC to 133BC lead to the most extensive political, economic and social transformations in western civilization. From its origin as a city-state on the peninsula of Italy, to its rise as an empire covering much of Southern Europe, Western Europe, Near East and North Africa by 133BC, the Roman Empire spread its power and influence and became “the unchallenged mistress of the western Mediterranean.” By the latter part of the 2nd Century BC, this rapid expansion brought about severe political, economic and social problems. The vast expanse of area meant that the empire could no longer afford infrastructure, defence and administrative costs, which in turn severely weakened its administration and …show more content…
The Roman Senate decided certain matters without reference to the assembly of the people. While there was still considerable opposition to Roman power in the Mediterranean, the Romans suddenly found themselves as the only western super-power and the governing of this power would soon prove difficult for the former republica ways. With the administration of new provinces came the question of how to control and run them. The past history of leading monarchies and tyrants had proved that single man ruling did not work so instead the Senatus Populusque Romanus was developed. Theoretically, this system was designed to ensure that all political operations had the people’s best interests at heart. The system valued the sharing of political roles and no man having too much power for any length of time. With each new province, Rome created new praetorships to fill the roles. Mackay wrote “with the number of territorial provinces exceeding the annual number of praetors... the senatorial oligarchy would find it more and more difficult to deal with the administrative burden of providing the necessary governors.” As the number of required magistrates grew, and the power base expanded, more people gained auctoritas or more competition, leading to corruption and greed. As a solution, the Romans believed that someone needed to be in charge for a longer period of time. …show more content…
The expansion of empire led to an influx of wealth into Italy, much of it into the hands of the Roman élite, and the investment of this wealth in land and the exploitation of slaves captured during years of continual warfare gradually transformed the economy of much of central Italy. Hopkins wrote “huge numbers of people, values and resources flowed into Italy and the existing political structure had no way of absorbing or administrating it all.” However instead of this wealth benefiting all the classes, the majority went to the governing classes. These classes became wealthier while the poorer classes were exploited. As Rome became a dominant power throughout the Mediterranean the instability came not from outside its borders but from within. Many of the best agricultural lands in Italy were devastated from wars, as many Roman farmers had burned their fields and crops to prevent enemy soldiers from living off the land, and many wealthy opportunists had profited during the war and were no longer inclined to finance small farmers. Slavery fuelled the Roman economy, and its rewards for the wealthy turned out to be disastrous for the working classes. Alongside this growth of the large estates, was the shrinkage of the towns and a decline in the quality and extent of ancient civilisation. The cities began to wither away and urbanisation slowed down as the empire became more and more based around a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Empire is one of the most well-known and prominent civilizations of its time. It was the epitome of power and the impact it made on Western civilization has been profound. The empire became a melting pot and a place where people of different backgrounds could trade and travel freely. It spread over a vast area of land and encompassed much of the area surrounding the Mediterranean, which is known as Western Europe. At the time, it may have seemed that bigger was better, but the sheer size of the Roman Empire contributed to its decline.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the government began to take on more responsibility that was originally the citizens of Rome they weakened the people’s spirits, which therefore led to a decline in the entrepreneurs and wanting to gain more wealth in Rome (Document…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was one of the largest empires in the world. Growing and expanding from Spain to Asia. But sadly, everything has an end. Three topics that contributed to the downfall of the Roman Empire were bad emperors and leadership, illnesses, and invaders. Bad emperors contributed to the downfall of Rome because the Roman empire was not being ruled properly.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Analysis

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Were the Primary Reasons for the “Fall” of Rome? The many problems in Rome caused it to cripple - the soft belly city, destroying faster and faster - and finally “vanishing” after laziness of Emperors and the Roman people. Before the Romans decline: before 200 CE, it was the world’s greatest empire - an unremarkable settlement - a “powerhouse!” “This rise to power came with the thrust of a spear and the slash of a sword.”…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rome had elections for the people of this republic so that they could pick two consuls who for one year controlled the military, and ten tribunes who would represent the people in the government. In times of political distress the Roman people would pick one dictator to rule over the empire until everything was back to order. The rules and laws that the tribunes established were used to govern the territories. The cities of these territories would post the rules up in their town forum where all citizens of the cities could see it. One primary source that helps show the efficiency of the Roman Empire is a series of “rules incised on ten plates of bronze for public display in the town’s forum.”…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In conclusion, the Roman Republic, though a democracy, had a few restraints put on the power held by the citizens that took away from its democratic…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Rise Of Rome

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Not confined only to wars for religious or political reasons or against terrorists and enemies, Rome went to battle for the sake of its very survival. Their economy depended greatly on the acquisition of new territories, whose “plunder was a major source of wealth for commanders and soldiers alike...the Romans developed highly formalized ways of acquiring it and distributing it” (Boatwright 146). With each new conquest, the size of the republic ballooned, enabling them to control much of the trade and travel around the Mediterranean and replenishing food supplies through the annexation of hundreds of miles of farmland and crops. The quality of life skyrocketed with the influx of slave labor that enhanced the travel infrastructure with new roads, provided amenities such as running water from new aqueducts to beautiful bathhouses, and promoted religious zeal by creating impressive temples to honor the gods.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fall of the Roman Empire In approximately 200 AD, the ruling power of Greece started to diminish whereas the Roman Empire continued to expand at an exponential rate. The Roman Army persisted in their efforts to seize territory, and was so thorough in its imperialistic endeavors that it grew to an impressive size. Rome, obtaining the title of preeminent empire of the ancient world for several centuries, was comprised of various elements from successful societies such as the Greeks and Etruscans. These foreign lands impacted the republican government organization and further political ideology as well as the basic social and religious morals of the Roman people. Compared to all healthy governments, Western Rome faced trials regarding its…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Republic was built on the traditional policy of compromise, devoted to ensure the welfare of the people. In time, the struggle for authority brought fundamental changes to the traditional sentiments of the Republic. As territory expansions brought great wealth into the country, power hungry senators and government officials harbored political ambitions and competed for power. Political treachery and self-interest within the senate and the assemblies gave way to economic turmoil and social unrest. The fight for control under the existing Republic ultimately demanded a conversion toward Empire, but before the transition could take place Rome would have to go through a series of civil war, mob violence and murder.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many great leaders with very different styles of commanding. Some of these methods, while unorthodox, benefited the land’s people, the land’s economy, and people’s spirituality. In Rome, there were two powerful leaders who approached the throne differently: Gaius Octavius, “Augustus” and Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus, “Constantine”. Both of these men inspired changes for the Roman Empire, such as: political reforms, spiritual reforms, and social reforms. This paper will discuss which of the two men should have been deemed the true “Augusti”.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The development of early Rome was fundamental to the rise and fall of the political and economic developments of the late Roman Republic. In 753, we begin to see the…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the ‘Western Roman Empire’ was caused by a number of internal and external factors spread over more than a century. Their are many theories providing an explanation for the the fall of the empire and pinpointing the beginning of its decay, however one of the most accepted theories begins in the reign of Emperor Constantine (306-337 A.D) and his part in the split of the Roman Empire into two ‘West’ and ‘East’ regions and ends with the abdication of Romulus Augustus in 475 A.D. Responsibility is also given to the many waves of barbarians migrating into and pillaging the outer regions of the Western Empire, as well as widespread corruption, economic and social issues within the empire. The theory of government corruption having a…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pax Romana Essay

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman Empire was at its highest peak during the reign of Augustus, in which he installed the idea of Pax Romana (meaning Roman peace) to bring peace, security, and civilized life to the Roman nation. However, even in the times of happiness and prosperity not all people welcomed the great Roman peace, as demonstrated by the troubles brewing in Egypt, Gaul, and Judea. As Rome began to falter under the economic, political, and military difficulties, many Romanized nations began to withdraw their support. The Roman nobles, rather than invest their money in the industries of Rome, chose to misuse their wealth, causing the economy to come to a halt. So, by the third century A.D. and the end of Marcus Aurelius reign, which ended Pax Romana, the…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Economy Essay

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bernie Sanders once said, “A nation will not survive morally or economically when so few have so much, while so many have so little.” This statement accurately represents the Roman economy. Rome started out as a small city-state, but developed into a large empire because of its economy. The wealthy population of Rome nearly controlled the economy, while the poor lived difficult lives. Though much of the power rested with the rich, the growth in the economy was accomplished by the work done by slaves and civilians.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With the defeat of a vast majority of the newly obtained city-states Rome became rich in culture, money and goods, however these spoils were not shared amongst the masses, and they were kept to be spread amongst the few rich aristocrats, who ran the government of Rome. They were what I’d refer to as the one percent. Although this may have been advantageous to the people in power it was demoralizing to the common people of Rome who were often forgotten and left to fend for themselves, with the little that they…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics