EDAD 524: Legal Case Study

Improved Essays
EDAD 524 Final Exam

Question 1
Robert claims the university has breached its contractual obligations when it determined that his academic progress was insufficient. There is no true process provided for determining continuance in the Psychology Doctorate Program. The graduate school handbook does list a timeline or established criteria for dismissing a student from the program. Once a student is admitted to a program, contractual obligations are defined, however terms of that must be defined. Once again this program has no terms provided for dismissal of the program. The bare minimum obligation of these contracts is for the university to act in good faith. Typically, in contract law, the courts defer to the university. Robert failed to meet many of the requirements listed to earn the degree, however there is no clear readmission policy provided. The university breached the contract because there was no language that would have made Robert know he was in danger of being dismissed from the program.
Robert claims he was denied procedural and substantive due process in the decision made by the university. In addressing procedural due process there are two questions that must be answered before moving forward; did the law or policy interfere with a protected interest? And what is the process
…show more content…
It is fair to say that the language in the graduate student handbook leaves a great deal to the imagination. The decision dismiss Robert from the program appears to be somewhat of an arbitrary one. The policy overall is very vague and does not truly give the students and idea of what is acceptable and unacceptable as far as academic progress is concerned in the Psychology program. However, there is no right or liberty being taken away. There is no fundamental right to an education or practice a trade therefore no liberty or right was infringed

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    So as far as the emergency plan goes, the VTPD was not placed high enough in a decision making position. It was also clear the students and faculty of the university were not educated or prepared for an event such as this. No one really knew what to do. As discussed earlier, this event could have been prevented because it was clear Cho was a risk to himself and/or others. The emergency plan of VT did not deal with prevention of events, i.e., threat or risk…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Solo’s research violates several APA ethics codes as well as infringes on all of the APA General Principles in some manner. Dr. Solo had not done any research since many years earlier while he was in graduate school. It was also during that time, many years ago, that he developed a research protocol for measuring treatment results. Therefore, due to his lack of current knowledge of test design, Dr. Solo is in violation of APA ethics code 9.5 Test Construction. Psychologists who develop tests and other assessments are to use current scientific or professional knowledge for test design.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that Socrates’s claim at 96c-d of the Meno that virtue cannot be taught because there are no teachers of virtue is not valid. Specifically, I will show Socrates reasoning and claim as to why there are no teachers of virtue, which means virtue cannot be taught. Then I will demonstrate why Socrates’s reasoning is false due to a missed detail in his argument. I conclude Socrates’s reasoning behind his arguments are mostly logical and sound, however he made the mistake of forgetting to mention an important detail that is detrimental to his argument. Socrates claims that virtue cannot be taught because there are no teachers of virtue at 96c-d due to various leaps of logic and reason.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of HEW

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bell for failing to sign to a Compliance Form that would result in enacting Title IX. In result, the US government denied financial aid and resulted in a case brought against them by the community college and four students“()”. The courts decided that Title IX was only for educational hubs like universities that received funding and private programs and schools did do not have to comply with the discrimination law when dealing with athletic programs which opened the doorway to gender discrimination. Justice White slowed Title IX when ruled that Title IX was only worthy for “public funding” ; this allowed institutions to realize that they can easily evade being covered by the governing Title IX. In order not to comply with Title IX, many institutions and universities found a way through the loophole in the 70s by emphasizing their lack in participating in federally funded programs such as Pell Grant and the BEOG Waiver Fee.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is because we would not have prevented the “definite damage, or the definite risk of damage to individuals and the public” which Mill believed was the only reason to limit ones liberties (Mill, p. 87). We already know from Spencer’s other speeches that he comes with a definite risk of damage and therefore he should be denied the ability to speech at SVSU if he requests to do…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Likeability and social proof are not present either because I have no connections and no similarities with the model. This GUESS advertisement also doesn’t use scarcity. There is no “Hurry before they’re gone!” screaming at me from the page and I’m not worried about losing anything. Furthermore, it also doesn’t offer reciprocity. Maybe it’s suggesting that by purchasing GUESS product the consumers will become just like the attractive model; however, that’s a poor way of “giving back”.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alternatively, Caldwell contends that review of this sufficiency claim is proper because Caldwell’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence before the trial court. We hold that this issue is not preserved and we decline to consider whether there was sufficient evidence to convict Caldwell of conspiracy to burglarize the Alkaline Water Company. The scope of appellate review is articulated in Md. Rule 8-131(a) and provides that “[o]rdinarily, the appellate court will not decide any other issue unless it plainly appears by the record to have been raised in or decided by the trial court . .…

    • 1873 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Victor Tan Chen article, on “Are Campus Activist Too Dogmatic”, many points were made, however was not followed by a valid argument. In his article, he discussed how college activist is a nuisance to society in a way that targets liberals. Chen never seems to emphasize in his article the reasons for the campus activists protest, yet includes the fact that their protest is highly severe. In other words, Chen’s article is almost dismissive to the whole point of the student protesters furthermore, describing their actions as being useless in its entirety even with them tackling issues like racism and sexism. It is a total disregard of your first amendment right, abridging the right to freedom of speech in this country in a logical…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case began when Edward Peruta was denied a concealed carry permit in San Diego County under the pretense that he did not have a predefined, “good cause,” (Gore). Peruta lost the case. Now, I will examine why Peruta lost the case. For one, it was decided that Peruta did not have a, “good cause.” San Diego Law required that the applicant had a, “good cause,” and that Peruta’s cause of self-defense was not sufficient (Gore). It was decided that this was constitutional because it only barred certain people from not using weapons.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bake Stone Research Paper

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    18 Sept. 2012 Oluf Rygh, and his colleagues at Northwestern University dismissed to the stone and consider it is just a ridiculous joke, which was made by Ohman, but he did not prove for his opinion. In addition, a short time later in 1986, Erik Wahlgren declared the Kensington inscription was recognized by linguistic scholars on both sides of the Atlantic as a simple, modern forgery, so it was not runic inscription. However, he did not give specific evidence. People just make the rumors kept spreading with the evidence is not convincing. For instance, Laura Billings just claimed that Kensington Runestone was not real, and they created it to use as a means to attract tourists.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays