The healthcare industry is estimated to spend between $20 and $30 billion dollars each year on construction and renovation projects in the United States (Becker, Bonaiuto, Bilotta & Bonnes, 2011). Because the healthcare industry uses an excessive amount of resources on construction, it becomes critical to rethink and change how the design process is conducted. Designers throughout the world are starting to use EBD as a method to rethink the design process in healthcare. Additionally, the leadership in the healthcare industry are starting to demand it. The leadership prefer the EBD process because it gives them information typically not explore during a typical design process. EBD in the healthcare industry is the process of basing design decisions on the built environment from credible research or
…show more content…
Furthermore, EBD is a means for gathering data from evidence obtained, from a variety of research methods, to make critical decisions about the design of a project (Stichler, 2014). The evidence is typically found in peer reviewed journals, analyzing experiences from other hospitals, or past experience a designer had with the particular strategy. Stichler (2014) found evidence that many design firms claim to use EBD, but do not follow the proper parameters in conducting the research, therefore obtaining subpar results. Additionally, design firms claim that the added cost for EBD is too great for the outcome achieved, that the articles and research are too technical to follow, or that the designers do not know where to find the evidence (Stichler, 2014). The misconceptions stem from the identity that EBD implies an in-depth research method to an extensive research paper. Stichler (2014) argues that the EBD process is not more expensive than the standard design and states that if completed properly can be a cost-effective tool. The EBD research needs to consider existing evidence, including research findings, observations, expert opinions, and
Furthermore, EBD is a means for gathering data from evidence obtained, from a variety of research methods, to make critical decisions about the design of a project (Stichler, 2014). The evidence is typically found in peer reviewed journals, analyzing experiences from other hospitals, or past experience a designer had with the particular strategy. Stichler (2014) found evidence that many design firms claim to use EBD, but do not follow the proper parameters in conducting the research, therefore obtaining subpar results. Additionally, design firms claim that the added cost for EBD is too great for the outcome achieved, that the articles and research are too technical to follow, or that the designers do not know where to find the evidence (Stichler, 2014). The misconceptions stem from the identity that EBD implies an in-depth research method to an extensive research paper. Stichler (2014) argues that the EBD process is not more expensive than the standard design and states that if completed properly can be a cost-effective tool. The EBD research needs to consider existing evidence, including research findings, observations, expert opinions, and