In dystopian stories they often reflect the worst parts of the societies. Whenever authors write a dystopian story they take a look at society and pick out whatever 's bad or needs to be changed. Dystopia novels always show the bad side of things.
In the book The Hunger Games there are 12 districts of Panem. Each district is allocated by what the capital tells them to do:district 1 luxury,district 2 masonry/stonework,district 3 electronics, district 4 fishing, district 5 power,district 6 transportation, district 7 lumber, district 8 textiles,district 9 grain, district 10 livestock,district 11 agriculture and district 12 coal mining. Every year there is something call the hunger games where 1 boy and 1 girl from each district go into and area …show more content…
So of course districts closer to the capital have tributes that are big, bulky and ready to fight. When on the other hand you have districts like 12 that have a hard time trying to feed a family. The Hunger Games is similar to the movie Divergent. In Divergent there are factions which are controlled by a government. Just like in The Hunger Games there are factions/districts that are richer and better off than some of the others. The factions are divided into five groups based on your personality: abnegation, candor, erudite, amity and dauntless. Once you turn 16 you are required to take an aptitude test to show which faction you will fit in best. When Tris took the aptitude test the results were inconclusive because she didn 't fit in just one faction she fit in all; Tris was divergent which was a bad thing because divergent are highly unliked by the government. The day before the choosing ceremony Tris said,“Tomorrow at the choosing ceremony, I will decide on a faction; I will decide the rest of my life; I will decide to stay with my family or abandon them”(Divergent). Tris picks dauntless which is the brave faction that watches over the city. Throughout the movie alot of things pop up about how candor doesn 't like abnegation being in charge because abnegation is poor and candor is rich. Candor doesn 't like how on of the poor factions has some control; so candor sets out to ruin abnegation and gain
In the book The Hunger Games there are 12 districts of Panem. Each district is allocated by what the capital tells them to do:district 1 luxury,district 2 masonry/stonework,district 3 electronics, district 4 fishing, district 5 power,district 6 transportation, district 7 lumber, district 8 textiles,district 9 grain, district 10 livestock,district 11 agriculture and district 12 coal mining. Every year there is something call the hunger games where 1 boy and 1 girl from each district go into and area …show more content…
So of course districts closer to the capital have tributes that are big, bulky and ready to fight. When on the other hand you have districts like 12 that have a hard time trying to feed a family. The Hunger Games is similar to the movie Divergent. In Divergent there are factions which are controlled by a government. Just like in The Hunger Games there are factions/districts that are richer and better off than some of the others. The factions are divided into five groups based on your personality: abnegation, candor, erudite, amity and dauntless. Once you turn 16 you are required to take an aptitude test to show which faction you will fit in best. When Tris took the aptitude test the results were inconclusive because she didn 't fit in just one faction she fit in all; Tris was divergent which was a bad thing because divergent are highly unliked by the government. The day before the choosing ceremony Tris said,“Tomorrow at the choosing ceremony, I will decide on a faction; I will decide the rest of my life; I will decide to stay with my family or abandon them”(Divergent). Tris picks dauntless which is the brave faction that watches over the city. Throughout the movie alot of things pop up about how candor doesn 't like abnegation being in charge because abnegation is poor and candor is rich. Candor doesn 't like how on of the poor factions has some control; so candor sets out to ruin abnegation and gain